AQUARIUS AND HIS ACCOMPLICES
Of Maurizio Blondet
Dear Italians
Summer is back. I want to go out for walks, don't stay at the computer for nine hours a day writing ponderous pieces that don't move anyone from their prejudices. I'll just show you some photos. If you don't see in them the grin of Lucifer and the scorching hiatus of SatQUna, I'm sorry for you.
Aquarius, from Naples to Palermo the mayors against Salvini: “Our ports are open. It's heartless and violates the rules."
Luigi De Magistris and Leoluca Orlando give their willingness to welcome the Aquarius ship with the additions on board 600 migrants. The mayor of Messina: “The ship is headed here, and the dictation: the port is open". Falcomata (Reggio Calabria): “Available as always”. Pd: “Humanitarian risks, speak Conte".
To illustrate the well-known verses:
“We have been around for centuries trampled upon and mocked because we are not people because we are divided".
Orlando belongs to that immovable gang that Leonardo Sciacia called Anti-mafia professionals. De Magistris comes from the magistrates court, persecutory and interceptor, and at the same time inept, incompetent and arbitrary, which is one of the main obstacles for the Italian recovery. Now, obeying their sectarianism, they have reached the pinnacle of irresponsibility. They realize that, if Salvini loses, the doors are open – irreversibly – to an invasion without limits, then millini, ruinous for everyone, managed by financial powers capable of arming fleets and salarying crews for months. But them, to defeat a Salvini, they are ready to do any damage to Italy, irreversible.
What are we talking about:
of a ship 77 meters, 1810 tons, belonging to a German joint-stock company. Flying the flag of Gibraltar. I seem to remember that a ship is a piece of the territory of the nation whose flag it flies. So, when a German ship flying the flag of Gibraltar welcomes refugees on board, the place of first reception becomes Gibraltar. Not Italy.
Gino Strada admitted that these "bailouts" were pre-organized and orchestrated to challenge the new government:
THE THREAT OF GINO STRADA: “I PREDICT A WAVE OF LANDINGS” AGAINST SALVINI
(one of the oligarchs who take millions)
Who, what lies behind the hospitality business:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1601343606643405&id=355062777938167&_rdr
Eugenio Scalfari, De Benedetti's partner (which he never returned 600 million to Montepaschi) and Bergoglio's confessor, instigates civil war, in the name of the oligarchy: Read More
They were a disaster for 40 years… and now they are in a hurry. (That is to say, every time the media loves someone, this someone does damage...)
Of Marco Giannini
Source: Comedonchisciotte
Italy is a strange country, we see "unified networks" broadsides raining down on the Government in the process of being formed and this happens precisely from people like Monti, Berlusconi, Bossi, Renzi, Study Program, Veltroni, Padoan and Cottarelli (FMI…), who since the time of the Moro murder have contributed to devastating the country, in ideology and practice, polluting its culture and exporting its well-being.
To name a few, the “Riforma Treu” of work which has brought precariousness to monstrous levels, compressing the economy and causing insecurity, the rules of entry of foreigners functional to the downward competition between Italians and foreigners regarding wages and social rights, the knowledge reforms which have weakened the role and figure of the teacher (inwards and outwards) and destroyed the civic sense of the country as well as the quality and meritocracy of the school, the contemporary and dramatic comparative flattening of the level of competitiveness of our universities implemented at the beginning of the millennium which made, moreover, i university baronies even more "expensive" and politicized, the “Divide et Impera” implemented by 1994 (acting on obsolete grudges and ideologies) which polarized Italians into "right" and "left" (theoretically appropriate dynamics) but transversally (!) given that the main division should have been between city instances (contemptuously defined as “populist”) real economic and those of speculative income, primarily those of the large financial corporations (rooted abroad) with their very powerful political-institutional-lobbying apparatus (…), the Bank of Italy/Treasury divorce, the privatization of banks and shares of Bankitalia (…), the next one theft of our gold reserve, the wild liberalizations of capital and supplies which have increased the cost of living, the emptying of the CGIL now reduced to a moribund business committee, the Franco-German financial technicalities passed off as “Europe” which have uprooted and are uprooting huge slices of well-being (tens of billions a year) with pro-bank and pro-multinational rules that have high unemployment and high taxation as their "net profit"., the ideological exaltation of globalization.
Renzi is finished? Ok, but spare us Prodi, Veltroni e tutto quello che c'era prima
Report Linkiesta
You may like it and you may (very legitimately) don't like Renzi's style. But if the alternative is a return to the old guard of the left, then it means that the Democratic Party deserves grillism and anti-politics
Of Francesco Cancellato
That Renzi is in bad shape, politically, it is a fairly incontrovertible fact. That the Democratic Party around the 22/23% in pre-bloc polls is objectively a party in a devastating identity crisis, pure. That the future of the main Italian center-left party – assuming that it will have a unitary future – must be something different from Leopolda, it is self-evident. Let no one think of it, but, to go back, to the pre-scrappage ruling class.
We say it, reading about noble fathers like Prodi who position themselves, of hypotheses of Veltroni secretariats, or Franceschini. Of returns to the fold, as protagonists, by D'Alema and Bersani. No, Thank you. If there is something that could be even more harmful than Renzi bolting to the Nazarene, it is the return of the Second Republic-model Democratic Party.
We say it by remembering – to them, above all – That the Renzi phenomenon was born precisely from a crisis of rejection of a large part of the democratic electorate towards them, of that immobile power block, self-referential, exhausted, incapable of building a political vision that was such, let alone make it attractive in the eyes of voters.
Even the Five Star Movement, in conclusion, it began to germinate precisely on the radical criticism of the centre-left ruling class of the second republic, unable, according to Beppe Grillo, to constitute a real alternative to Berlusconi and centre-right governments. The Monti government, the first great coalition, it was an all too welcome gift that produced the exploit of 2013.
Agree, Renzi has not reversed course, and the Democratic Party continued, with him too, its unstoppable fall. But if Renzi hadn't been there, probably, we would be talking about even worse numbers. Without Renzi, for example, the Letta and Gentiloni governments would have been perceived for what they really were, two inconclusive and excessively timid executives, without any idea – right or wrong – on the future of Italy. Without Renzi we would be talking about a Christian Democratic and seaside legislature, of pure management of the existing, without any spectacular failure, Perhaps, but without any planning impetus.
We say it, reading about noble fathers like Prodi who position themselves, of hypotheses of Veltroni secretariats, or Franceschini. Of returns to the fold, as protagonists, by D'Alema and Bersani. No, Thank you. If there is something that could be even more harmful than Renzi bolting to the Nazarene, it is the return of the Second Republic-model Democratic Party.
We say it by remembering – to them, above all – That the Renzi phenomenon was born precisely from a crisis of rejection of a large part of the democratic electorate towards them, of that immobile power block, self-referential, exhausted, incapable of building a political vision that was such, let alone make it attractive in the eyes of voters.
Even the Five Star Movement, in conclusion, it began to germinate precisely on the radical criticism of the centre-left ruling class of the second republic, unable, according to Beppe Grillo, to constitute a real alternative to Berlusconi and centre-right governments. The Monti government, the first great coalition, it was an all too welcome gift that produced the exploit of 2013.
Agree, Renzi has not reversed course, and the Democratic Party continued, with him too, its unstoppable fall. But if Renzi hadn't been there, probably, we would be talking about even worse numbers. Without Renzi, for example, the Letta and Gentiloni governments would have been perceived for what they really were, two inconclusive and excessively timid executives, without any idea – right or wrong – on the future of Italy. Without Renzi we would be talking about a Christian Democratic and seaside legislature, of pure management of the existing, without any spectacular failure, Perhaps, but without any planning impetus.