Now Gentiloni will make many apologies to Putin?

Of Maurizio Blondet
Now Gentiloni will make many apologies to Putin?
 
Source: Maurizio Blondet
The accusation of the May government in Moscow, of having poisoned the former spy Skripal and his daughter, it's crumbling. Revealing itself for what it is: a huge state "fake news"., and maybe a false flag unsuccessful. Yesterday the news that the director of Porton Down (the British military laboratories for chemical-bacteriological weapons) he admitted: we don't have proof that the Novichock used (or that it would be used) against Skripal is of Russian origin.
The point is that the British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson he had assured, in a tweet from 22 March and immediately spread throughout the world, that “analyses conducted at the Porton Down War Science and Technology laboratory by world-class experts they found out that it is the military nerve agent Novichok produced in Russia”. In short, the government had committed the word of its world-famous scientists without having consulted them, and before they conducted the investigation.
 
 
Read More

Share

Putin is indeed guilty? Something just doesn't add up in the Skripal case

Of Marcello Foa
Putin is indeed guilty? Something just doesn't add up in the Skripal case
Source: Marcello Foa
We are really sure that the Russians were the ones who poisoned the former spy Skripal and his daughter? Allow me to raise more than one doubt by carefully examining the news that has come out so far. The points that don't add up are these:
Primo. What is the motive? What is the interest in Putin? Let me explain: everyone recognizes the Russian president's great sagacity in calibrating his moves. He excels in both strategy and tactics. We have long known that the United States (which drive Europe) they are engaged in an operation to wear down the Kremlin aimed at obtaining a realignment towards pro-American positions, which can only be achieved with certainty through a change of regime or with Putin's exit from the scene. Since a colored revolt is unfeasible, the scenario is to make the weight of sanctions and international isolation unsustainable, causing Russian elites to rebel against the newly re-elected president.
In this context, every pretext is used to unnerve or weaken Putin. Knowing the end goal, you have to ask yourself: but what interest did the Russian president have in trying to eliminate a former spy, however out of the picture, resorting to the most spectacular of assassination attempts, the only one that - after the pollonio affair - the whole world would have attributed to the Kremlin? You will agree: it doesn't make sense. Diplomatically it would have been suicide, because it would have offered the West an opportunity for a further anti-Russian campaign, which in fact occurred promptly. No, Putin is not the leader to make these mistakes. Read More

Share

Italy is Putin's enemy due to one-way Atlantic solidarity

Of Alberto Negri
Italy is Putin's enemy due to one-way Atlantic solidarity
Source: Alberto Negri

Why Italy should wage a cold war on Russia? One of the most worn refrains of international politics that can be read in the Italian press at the moment, after the obvious re-election of Putin to the Russian presidency and the Skripal case, it's called "Atlantic solidarity". But for Italy what does it consist of?? Military terms this: ours is the NATO country with the most American nuclear devices in Europe even if it does not manage them directly, beyond 70, of which 20 in the Ghedi base e 50 in Aviano. Among the warheads there are also thermonuclear bombs with the power of 50 kilotons whose presence constitutes the reason for a hypothetical preventive attack in the event of nuclear conflict.

If we then move on to politics, the so-called "Atlantic solidarity" has paradoxical aspects for Italy. US nukes in Italy, such as the bases or "facilities" of the American armed forces, they are almost always a taboo topic for Italian politicians, even for those who have just won the elections: it is never talked about because Washington's approval of a leader or a party remains a fundamental aspect. Sigonella's shadow, with the clash in 1985 between Craxi and Reagan's United States on the fate of the hijackers of the Achille Lauro ship, it remains as a sort of warning: sooner or later the bills with Washington will be paid. Nobody wants to disturb the NATO handler, (to which Donald Trump would like Europeans to contribute more). Even when the driver doesn't exactly have our interests in mind: the former chief of staff Vincenzo Camporini also said it some time ago when France, USA and Great Britain decided in 2011 to bomb Libya Gaddafi without even making a phone call. We remember that at the time Russia abstained on the UN resolution that started the bombings: “If we had not granted the Italian bases for their planes, the bombing operations would have been longer and more difficult”. So, is the general's reasoning, opposing it was technically possible, instead we also joined the raids with a decision essentially taken by the former head of state Giorgio Napolitano. As for Libya, Italy has seen very little of "Atlantic and European solidarity".: tens of billions lost, hundreds of thousands of refugees while the immigration issue was decisive in determining the new political framework. In short, Salvini and Di Maio also owe their votes in part to the failure of this "Atlantic solidarity" (and European), that Italy has never seen, on the contrary. Read More

Share
1 2 3 4 5