The American New World Order is officially dead

Of Henry Tougha
The American New World Order is officially dead
Source: Voices from abroad
A mainstream source such as Bloomberg states The American dream of imposing its own system of global control is officially dead. Russia, after recovering from the collapse of the Soviet Union, together with a new power like China, they have escaped US leadership by creating alternative poles of influence. Naturally Bloomberg takes an absolutely favorable and rosy point of view on the new peaceful and collaborative world order that the United States would try to pursue and considers its end negatively, casting the responsibility on the authoritarianism and power aims of China and Russia. In essence, however, this official renunciation of the ambition to integrate these countries under the American empire does not mean peace: according to Bloomberg the consequence will be that the USA will have to commit itself in an increasingly aggressive manner to militarily defend the hitherto consolidated American empire.
at Hal Brands, 27 September 2017
American foreign policy has reached a historic turning point, and here's the surprise: it has little to do with Donald Trump's exhausting and controversial presidency. Read More

Share

Israel prepares for war?

Of Alastair Crooke
Israel prepares for war?
Source: Aurora site
General Mattis told the US Senate Armed Services Committee that he believes a military confrontation between Israel and Iran in Syria is increasingly likely: “I can see how it might start, but I'm not sure when or where“. This shouldn't be surprising. Anyone peeking through the membrane of the Western bubble, can see the main dynamics “bridging and strengthening” such that they inexorably close in on Israel. It becomes “inexorable”: not so much because the states of the Middle East desire war (they don't want it); but because Israel feels culturally forced to bind itself to President Trump and his team of extremists, placing itself as the first collaborator in the United States' "war" to repel China, Russia, Iran and make their commercial project an ineffective and weakened entity. The belligerent rhetoric of Pompeo and Bolton may seem like an intoxicating elixir to some Israelis; but the Middle East is simply not the place to collaborate in this new US hybrid "war" against the new emerging dynamics. Read More

Share

If you want peace, don't make war on us

Of Sergey Lavrov
If you want peace, don't make war on us
Source: Panorama
In an exclusive interview with “Panorama” on newsstands on 3 maggio, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, almost 15 years close collaborator of Putin, accuses the United States, Great Britain and a "small but very aggressive" group of Russophobic European countries. They have to resign themselves, dice, the world is no longer theirs. And he gives his version of the Salisbury poisonings and the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime. «The G7 is now inadequate, a model for the future is the Moscow-Beijing agreement".
Lavrov, in the interview he talks about all the main issues that have seen Russia as a protagonist in recent months, from the poisonings of spies in England to Syria, from the United States to relations with Europe.
Here are some passages from the long interview which can be read in full in the weekly: Read More

Share

The Israeli “Great Game”.

Of Giacomo Gabellini
The Israeli “Great Game”.
Source: Giacomo Gabellini
At the beginning of 2012, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu he went to the annual meeting of the very powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) to pronounce a harsh indictment against the political line of the Obama administration, interrupted by the reading of a few passages of a letter, dating back to 1944, through which the US War Department had communicated to representatives of the Zionist movement its rejection of their proposal to bomb a segment of the railway line leading to the Auschwitz concentration camp. At the end of his speech, il leaderdel Likud he stated furthermore that «none of us can afford to wait much longer. As Israeli Prime Minister, I will not allow my people to live in the shadow of annihilation", thus exploiting the suffering of the Jews for ideological purposes in accordance with the now consolidated practice of justifying Israeli policy. The Israeli prime minister himself indulged in a scene of the same kind during the United Nations General Assembly in September 2012, appearing before delegates from all over the world holding a poster depicting a ball bomb with a lit fuse, on which he drew a corresponding red line, according to him, to the “point of no return”, i.e. the limit that the United Nations they should prevent to Iran to overcome "before it completes the enrichment necessary to manufacture a bomb". Read More

Share

Israel wants war, but her enemies reject her

Of Bruno Guigue
Israel wants war, but her enemies reject her
Source: counterinformation
Israel bombs Syria again, Israel simplifies its military engagement process, Israel accuses Iran of possessing nuclear weapons… Without a doubt, We see: Israel is peace, the love between people and the light of nations. A metaphysical entity invested with extraordinary prerogatives, he has the right to bomb whoever he wants whenever he wants.
To achieve this impunity, it is true that the colonizing state has colonized everyone: Washington, Paris, London and even the UN. In the meantime, this entity bombs Syria, even causing a devastating escalation. It's incredible, but the missile fire of the 30 April is the 100th Israeli operation against Syria since 2013.
When Syrian military installations are attacked, However, Zionist leaders suspect that Damascus and Tehran (also indicated) they will end up taking revenge. All that escaped them was an Israeli plane (due, according to some sources) it was shot down in February, nor that the Syrian air defense repelled most of the missiles launched on April 14 by the neocolonial trio (USA-GB-France). Read More

Share

Why the UK, The European Union and the United States are uniting against Russia?

Of James Peter
Why the UK, The European Union and the United States are uniting against Russia?
Source: SakerItalia
Introduction
For much of the last decade the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union have waged a campaign to undermine and overthrow the Russian government and, in particular, to oust President Putin. Fundamental questions are at stake, including the real possibility of nuclear war.
The latest Western propaganda campaign, and one of the most virulent, it is the one that started with the accusation launched by the British regime of Prime Minister Theresa May. The British have claimed that Russian secret agents conspired to poison a former Russian double agent and his daughter in England, threatening the sovereignty and security of the British people. No evidence was ever presented. But the UK has expelled Russian diplomats and called for tougher sanctions, to increase tensions. The United Kingdom, its US and European backers are moving towards a breakdown in relations and increasing military proliferation.
A number of fundamental questions arise regarding the origins and growing intensity of this anti-Russian sentiment. Read More

Share

Hitting Putin's Russia to educate the rest of the world (but there is no new cold war)

BEYOND PROPAGANDA, IN SEARCH OF THE TRUTH’
In reality there is no Cold War except in the desire of Western democracies to create it (as in the case of the former Russian spy killed in London… but by whom?)
Of Giampaolo Rossi

(AUTOMATIC READING)
Because the Moscow secret services (or Putin himself according to some) they would have decided to eliminate a former Russian spy living in London, handed over by themselves to the English 10 years before and which would have long since ceased all activity?
Per “revenge because the Russians do not forgive traitors”, those who know things explain. But then why didn't they kill him during the years when the spy was a prisoner in Moscow prisons?
And then why do it to 15 days after the presidential elections in Russia which will see Putin win his fourth term and at the moment of maximum tension between Russia and the West, in which Europe and the United States are accusing Moscow of practically everything (in a while’ also the ozone hole)?
And why to delete this “retired spy” they would have poisoned her with a chemical substance identified by British experts as “Novichok”, one of the most lethal nerve agents created and developed in Uzbekistan laboratories during the times of the Soviet Union?
Because the Russians would have left this perfect author's signature to theirs “useless” plot? It wasn't simpler than a gunshot to the head from a hitman or one of those unsuspected road accidents in which the victim unintentionally loses his life in absolutely random circumstances?
And we are sure that this “poison” leads directly to the responsibility of Moscow? Read More

Share

Attack in Syria: World War III postponed again this time…

THE OPINION
Of Giulio Ginnetti
A few days after the Western missile raid in Syria, it appears increasingly clear that it has not undermined the agreement between Trump and Putin to manage the spheres of influence in the troubled Middle Eastern country. What Russia and the United States have in common is the need to reaffirm their primacy on the international level, eroded in recent decades, but to do so in a way that manages differences, according to the agreement signed at the G20 in Hamburg, in July 2017.
Each of the two powers follows its own "national interests". The synthesis National Defense Strategy 2018 signed by US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, makes it clear that the primary national security concern of the United States is no longer terrorism, but the strategic competition between states. And between Russia and China, the two main actors, with the United States, on international theatre, Trump considers China his most formidable opponent and is seeking an agreement with Putin, to prevent the formation of an anti-American Russian-Chinese alliance.
The target of the raid, which was limited to a spectacular surgical operation, it was therefore not about overthrowing the Assad regime, protected by Moscow, but to strengthen the image of the United States. Trump, convinced French President Macron and British Prime Minister May to carry out a demonstration, without causing damage to Russian forces, obtaining in exchange Moscow's non-interference. Read More

Share

US Secretary of Defense: "Non abbiamo prove che Assad abbia usato armi chimiche"

Grotesque and warmongering Americanism…history repeats itself…but this time they admit it… (n.d.r.)

http://www.oltrelalinea.news/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/130305150918-james-mattis-1-full-169.jpg

After so many biased and one-sided narratives, The US has finally admitted that it has no evidence that Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons. This communication, in conclusion, …

CONTINUE ON:
http://www.oltrelalinea.news/2018/02/17/segretario-della-difesa-usa-non-abbiamo-prove-che-assad-abbia-usato-armi-chimiche/ Read More

Share

Syria, Russia annucia: “Rebel chemical laboratory found”

Syria, Russia annucia: Report Wall Street Italia
Of Mariangela Tessa
The Russian military claims to have found a laboratory in Douma, in Syria, used by rebel militiamen to manufacture chemical weapons.

“And chemical laboratory and a chemical warehouse were found during an inspection – spiega alla tv Russia-24 Alexander Rodionov, a spokesman for Moscow's troops -. They found a container of chlorine similar to the one used by the militiamen to stage the fake chemical attack.".

Meanwhile, it goes up the tension between Moscow and Paris with the former defending itself against French accusations according to which Russia tried to block access to the site of the alleged chemical attack in Syria.
In this regard the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova called on Western countries to “stop manipulating public opinion” on the issue, underlining that “it is not clear why the French Foreign Ministry is speaking on behalf of the OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons). If the inspectors had problems, make a statement on this issue”, he said. Read More

Share
1 2 3 4 5