E' It's a crime to call Muhammad a pedophile

A shameful sentence! (N.d.R.)
EU Court: we must distinguish between marriage with a child and pedophilia
Of Magdi Allam
Dear friends, for the “European Court of Human Rights”, in fact the supreme authority of the judiciary in Europe, it is a crime to call Muhammad a pedophile. Not because the incontrovertible fact that in the 620, at the age of 50 years, he married a six-year-old girl, Aisha, even though the marriage was consummated for three years, In the 623, when the little girl was nine years old. But why, explains the sentence, Muhammad and Aisha remained married until his death in 632, that is, for nine years, when Aisha had 18 years. So, according to the European Court, it can be said that Muhammad married a little girl but not that he was a pedophile because "a pedophile is someone who is attracted only or mainly to minors". In short, since Aisha was Muhammad's only child wife, while his others 14 wives were adults, and Muhammad having been her husband until her death, the sexual orientation of the pedophile cannot be attributed to Muhammad. In conclusion for the European Court if an adult man marries a little girl only once and she remains his wife until his death, he does not qualify as a pedophile.
Based on this argument, the European Court ruled against an expert on Islamic issues, the Austrian Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who had lodged an appeal after being convicted in Austria in 2011 for "incitement to hatred" and "outraging the religious symbols of a recognized religious community". The European Court agreed with the ruling of the Austrian judiciary, according to which we must distinguish between marriage with a child and pedophilia. The European Court also endorsed the reasoning of the Austrian judiciary on the need to prevent the violent reaction of Islamists, I support the "legitimate aim of preventing disorder by safeguarding religious peace and respecting religious sentiment". Read More

Share

Prosecutor Gratteri in Paola: "Fare pulizia tra i magistrati. And also among journalists"

Gratteri discusses justice and information in Paola starting from the memory of Enzo Lo Giudice, Craxi's lawyer in “Clean Hands”. «I am Minister of Justice? Those who love me say that I was saved". Belpietro: «Magistrates who make mistakes should be suspended.
PAOLA «Among some lawyers and some clients the width of the desk has reduced. Allow this, especially in the criminal field, it is very dangerous. But it is dangerous not so much for the relationships created with clients but with fellow lawyers. Frankly, there are too many of them, and there are also too many cases that should not be in court". Nicola Gratteri in the cloister of Sant'Agostino, to Paola, thus answers journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi's first question. The lawyers Marcello Manna and Francesco Scrivano nod. The humidity of a strong summer storm mixes with the human warmth of an audience that sits down to commemorate one of the greatest lawyers in republican history: Enzo Lo Giudice. «I always say this to young people – continues the magistrate – don't look for shortcuts, they are not needed, make sure that the desk has a wide margin with your clients". And the desk of Enzo Lo Giudice it was wide. Craxi's lawyer in the “Mani Pulite” trial, communist formation, but above all a pure guaranteeist as his first practitioner recalls, now a lawyer, Francesco Scrivano. Defending the socialist leader in the judicial tornado set up by the "Clean Hands" pool of the three magistrates Davigo-Di Pietro-Colombo, for Lo Giudice it also meant dealing with the first real episode in Italy of what is today defined “media trial”. Since then everything changed. Even a notice of guarantee turned into a hearing in the newspaper columns. «The directors of the most important Italian newspapers – says Scrivano – called each other to agree on the title to be given the following day». Read More

Share

THE CASAMONICAS – protected species

Of Maurizio Blondet

THOSE CASAMONICA – TARTUFO freeloaders, CAVIAR AND CHAMPAGNE IN GUBBIO: A GOURMET WEDDING BANQUET COSTING 187 THOUSAND EUROS NEVER PAID – TO THE RESTAURANT'S COMPLAINT, HE WAS ANSWERED: “THE CASAMONICA ARE THE CASAMONICA” – NOW, BESIDES THE DAMAGE, THE HOOK: THE TIVOLI COURT HAS POSTPONED THE FIRST HEARING OF THE TRIAL AND ACCORDING TO THE VICTIM'S DEFENDER THERE IS THE RISK OF LIMITATION...
Nobody paid the bill and the owner of the "Taverna del wolf" in Gubbio, Rodolfo Mencarelli, he was forced to report. It was four years ago when he was scammed. And now that the prosecutor's office has ordered the judgement, identifying the two responsible for that scam, Laura and Amabile Casamonica, risks another prank. Called prescription of the crime. With all the consequences of the case, or no compensation for the damage suffered. Read More

Share