A shameful sentence! (N.d.R.)
EU Court: we must distinguish between marriage with a child and pedophilia
Of Magdi Allam
Dear friends, for the “European Court of Human Rights”, in fact the supreme authority of the judiciary in Europe, it is a crime to call Muhammad a pedophile. Not because the incontrovertible fact that in the 620, at the age of 50 years, he married a six-year-old girl, Aisha, even though the marriage was consummated for three years, In the 623, when the little girl was nine years old. But why, explains the sentence, Muhammad and Aisha remained married until his death in 632, that is, for nine years, when Aisha had 18 years. So, according to the European Court, it can be said that Muhammad married a little girl but not that he was a pedophile because "a pedophile is someone who is attracted only or mainly to minors". In short, since Aisha was Muhammad's only child wife, while his others 14 wives were adults, and Muhammad having been her husband until her death, the sexual orientation of the pedophile cannot be attributed to Muhammad. In conclusion for the European Court if an adult man marries a little girl only once and she remains his wife until his death, he does not qualify as a pedophile.
Based on this argument, the European Court ruled against an expert on Islamic issues, the Austrian Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who had lodged an appeal after being convicted in Austria in 2011 for "incitement to hatred" and "outraging the religious symbols of a recognized religious community". The European Court agreed with the ruling of the Austrian judiciary, according to which we must distinguish between marriage with a child and pedophilia. The European Court also endorsed the reasoning of the Austrian judiciary on the need to prevent the violent reaction of Islamists, I support the "legitimate aim of preventing disorder by safeguarding religious peace and respecting religious sentiment".
Well it is a fact that the European Court nourishes this particular sensitivity only towards Islam. Last January the same European Court ruled against using images of Jesus and Mary in advertising spots, even in irreverent poses, It's perfectly legitimate.
Dear friends, the ruling of the European Court, and even before the Courts of Justice of Austria, they make us see first-hand that judges in Europe behave as if we were already subjected to Islam. In order to absolve Muhammad from the obvious observation that, having married a six year old girl he has adopted behavior attributable to pedophilia, have introduced the criterion of "non-repetition" of the crime, so if he only did it once he is not to blame. But above all, according to the European Courts of Justice, the issue of safety must be put first: if saying that Muhammad was a pedophile will end up unleashing Islamic violence, then you don't have to say it. If, however, insulting Jesus does not trigger any violence on the part of Christians, then it can be outraged.
Well, the time has come to speak the truth freely. Only by speaking the truth in freedom even towards Islam, of Muhammad, of Allah and the Koran, we Europeans will be able to redeem our decadent civilization. Let's move forward with our heads held high and our backs straight. Together we will make it.
Source: http://www.imolaoggi.it/2018/10/29/corte-ue-bisogna-distinguere-tra-matrimonio-con-una-bambina-e-pedofilia/