On ritual crime, history and criticism (of Mons. Umberto Benigni)
From the conclusion of the research: «Ecco (exhibited here) the reasons that prohibit us from believing that the anguished question of the strictly ritual crime is absolutely exhausted in a negative sense". Mons. Umberto Benigni (Piano membership), anastatic copy of «Social History of the Church» 5/7, ed. C.L.S., Verrua Savoy, 2018, volume IV, tomo 1, from the page 369 to the page 387.
[For the ritual crime and for its inspiring environment, cfr. Paepstliche (Die).,. blood.; M. Stern, Urk. Contribution.; H. L. Strace:, The. blood.; D. Cholson, The blood tank.; quote yes P. Protected, What the Popes, ecc. Cfr. also Roccadadria, In the tribe, ecc.; E. Picard, The synthesise, ecc.: The Beylis trial (end of 1913) produced a great outpouring of articles for and against the general accusation, in which there may be some historical and documentary notes to appreciate. Significant in favor of the prosecution, that of the «Roman notebooks» reproduced by various newspapers (v. the "Croix» of Paris 14 November 1913, and of the «Barcelona Diary» 7 November); against the accusation that of «New Eresie Press» of Vienna (4 November). Of historical value is the aforementioned Vernet].
First of all, the nature and characteristics of the crime in question must be established. Why a crime is "ritual", it must not only be produced by a determinant of a religious nature, – from hatred against believers of other beliefs -, but it must take on the forms or mentalities of a ritual. And this is precisely the controversial "ritual crime" which is attributed to being determined by the inveterate Israeli hatred against Christians, and expressed with certain circumstances that link the crime to a form or at least to a ritual mentality. Read More

The. is available on the site
From the Quadragesimo Anno, 15 maggio 1931, Pope Pius XI: «In that way, that is, the unity of human society cannot be founded on class opposition, thus the correct order of the economy cannot be abandoned to the free competition of forces. From this end indeed, as if from a poisoned source, all the errors of individualistic economic science are derived, which forgets or ignores that the economy has its own social character, no less than moral, he believed that the public authority should esteem her and leave her absolutely free to her own devices, like that which had to find its own guiding principle or rudder in the market or free competition, according to which it would be directed much more perfectly than for any created intelligence. Except for free competition, although it is certainly fair and useful if contained within well-determined limits; it cannot be the helm of the economy in any way; which is demonstrated all too well by experience, when the norms of the individualistic spirit were applied in practice.

Saturday 18 maggio 2019

Giuseppe Federici Study Center – For a new onset
Giuseppe Federici Study Center – For a new onset