For the "European Court of Human Rights”, in fact the supreme authority of the judiciary in Europe, it is a crime to define Muhammad and pedophile. Not because the incontrovertible fact that in the 620, at the age of 50 years, he married a six-year-old girl, Aisha, although the marriage was consummated three years later, In the 623, when the little girl was nine years. But why, explains the sentence, Muhammad and Aisha remained married until his death in 632, that is, for nine years, when Aisha had 18 years. So, according to the European Court, it can be said that Muhammad married a little girl but not that he was a pedophile because "a pedophile is someone who is attracted only or mainly to minors". In short, Aisha was the only one child-wife of Muhammad, while his others 14 wives were adults, and Muhammad having been her husband until her death, the sexual orientation of the pedophile cannot be attributed to Muhammad. In conclusion for the European Court if an adult man marries a little girl only once and she remains his wife until his death, he does not qualify as a pedophile.Based on this argument, the European Court ruled against an expert on Islamic issues, l’austriaca Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who had lodged an appeal after being convicted in Austria in 2011 for "incitement to hatred" and "outraging the religious symbols of a recognized religious community". The European Court agreed with the ruling of the Austrian judiciary, secondo cui bisogna distinguere tra il matrimonio con una bambina e la pedofilia. La Corte Europea ha fatto propria anche la motivazione della magistratura austriaca sulla need to prevent the violent reaction of Islamists, supporting the "legitimate aim of preventing disorder by safeguarding religious peace and respecting religious sentiment". Well, it is a fact that the European Court has this particular sensitivity only towards Islam. Last January the European Court itself ruled that using the images of Jesus and Mary in commercials, even in irreverent poses, It's perfectly legitimate.
The ruling of the European Court, and even before the Courts of Justice of Austria, they make us see first-hand that judges in Europe behave as if we already were submitted to Islam. In order to absolve Muhammad from the obvious observation that, having married a six year old girl he took on a behavior attributable to pedophilia, have introduced the criterion of "non-repetition" of the crime, so if he only did it once he is not to blame. But above all, according to the European Courts of Justice, the issue of safety must be put first: if saying that Muhammad was a pedophile will end up unleashing Islamic violence, then you don't have to say it. If instead insult Jesus it does not trigger any violence on the part of Christians, then it can be outraged.
Well, the time has come speak the truth freely. Only by speaking the truth in freedom even towards Islam, of Muhammad, of Allah and the Koran, we Europeans will be able to redeem our decadent civilization. Let's move forward with our heads held high and our backs straight. Together we will make it.