Abortion for people who have already come into the world: this is one of the last frontiers of scientistic intellectuals. Here are the pathologies at risk

The ideological war being fought around bioethical issues knows no pauses. L’abortion it is one of the warmest fronts. In Italy, after years, the debate on the actual application and/or questioning of the law was reopened 194, but it is the ideas spread in certain circles frequented by intellectuals that frighten those who believe that life is sacred and unassailable from its conception until natural death. To denounce the dangerousness of those who propose a subsequent form of abortive practice, in time line, to the coming into the world of a human being, it was doctor Silvana De Mari, in a piece published in today's edition of The Truth.
Is called “postnatal abortion” and consists, in a nutshell, in performing abortion on a newborn or on a child who has already been in the world for more than a few years. To detect, for those who are in favor of this practice, are the health conditions of the person subjected to this practice, but also the consequences that the child's illness causes in the mother's psychic sphere. For those like Peter Singer, who is one of the propagators of this theory, l’haemophilia – he says at De Mari – it is one of the pathologies for which one could proceed without injury by means of what the doctor does not hesitate to call “infanticide”. We'll talk about it, Perhaps, at the World Congress of Families of Verona, where many pro-life groups have met for the end of March, also with the aim of signaling the advance of a certain culture that is as do-gooder as it is ruinous for the contemporary vision of bioethics. Scientism would be going beyond the level of common sense. And among the requests brought forward by whom, based only on scientific data, it seems to abandon the concept of the human person as we have known it, there is ideology “no kids”, that is, the one available to promote postnatal abortion. Which is a practice, moreover, which has already seen a certain diffusion in Northern Europe, where a certain ease of imposing the law has also taken hold'euthanasia.
Genetic diseases, people who came into the world with pathologies not found in prenatal diagnoses, human beings with problems that arose shortly after being born: these are, according to the vision of prenatal abortionists, the cases that could be discussed. “Prenatal abortion” – De Mari always points out – It's a less scary definition, perhaps because it is flavored with a scientific character, than a more direct one, and perhaps more truthful, “infanticide”.
Source: http://m.ilgiornale.it/news/2019/03/18/aborto-ora-spunta-quello-postnatale-per-le-malattie-genetiche/1664465/