Further evidence that the US 'attack by chemical weapons’ it was based on a 'false flag’

Further evidence has emerged indicating that the alleged chemical attack in Douma 2018, in Syria, it was staged by US-backed militiamen, not by the Syrian government.

Recent revelations indicate that the United States not only falsely accused Damascus of carrying out the attack, but they carried out bombings against Syria based on a false pretext. To this day, the United States has categorically failed to produce any convincing evidence to support its initial claims.

On the contrary, a subsequent investigation conducted by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has produced overwhelming evidence showing that a 'false flag' event’ it was carried out by US-backed militants. This included a chlorine gas cylinder found in a militant weapons cache inspected by OPCW investigators, which matched exactly with the two cylinders speciously used in the same Douma attack 2018.

While US-backed militants insisted that two gas cylinders were dropped from government helicopters on Douma, the OPCW observed that the alleged craters caused by the impact of the cylinders corresponded to those in nearby buildings clearly caused by explosive devices.

The OPCW final report regarding the Douma incident stated: He teams [of the OPCW mission in Syria] observed that a similar crater was present on a nearby building under construction.

The implication is that the cylinders could not have created the craters attributed to them by militants (supported by the United States) while the Western media supports this version of the story. Instead, implies that the cylinders were manually placed near pre-existing craters created by conventional ordnance.

While the OPCW's final report included photographs of damage on the adjacent building, did not further elaborate or consider the obvious implications of similar craters, explicitly seen nearby.

However, more recently, an unpublished OPCW report entitled “Engineering evaluation of two cylinders observed in the Douma accident – Synthesis” (PDF), has been processed: Experts were consulted to evaluate the appearance of the crater observed at the location 2, especially its lower part.

Experts' opinion is that the observed crater is more consistent with that resulting from a powerful explosion (such as that from an HE mortar or rocket artillery) rather than a result of impact of a falling object. This was also confirmed by the observation of the deformed rod facing outwards in the lower part of the crater, which cannot be explained by the apparent non-penetration and minimal damage to the cylinder. The probability that the crater was created by mortar/artillery bombardment or similar, it is also supported by the presence of several very similar-looking craters, in concrete slabs on top of nearby buildings, yes one (unusually high, but possible) Fragmentation pattern on upper walls, with indications of chipping of the concrete under the crater, e (while observing that they were created in the corner of the room) black burns on the bottom and top of the crater.

The engineering evaluation would conclude: In summary, observation on the scene of the two places, together with the subsequent analysis, suggests that there is a greater probability that both cylinders were manually placed in those two positions rather than being dropped from aircraft.

The assessment adds further importance to what many analysts concluded at the time the OPCW released its official final report on the incident – that the event was organised.

Upon closer inspection, Damascus had no motivation to carry out the attack 2018. This occurred on the eve of the total victory of Syrian forces over US-backed militants entrenched in tunnels around the Syrian capital. The Syrian army had used large conventional force to overcome the militants' positions and even if Damascus believed that the use of chemical weapons would speed up the victory, it is unlikely that for that purpose alone he would have launched 2 gas cylinders containing a negligible amount of chlorine.

Vice versa, the US-backed militants were facing inevitable and complete defeat, along with a US government in desperate need of a pretext to use military force to slow or stop the advance of Syrian troops – they had every motivation to stage the chemical attack, to blame Damascus, lying from the start.

If the political analysis of the alleged attack that considered the possible motivations of both sides for carrying out the attack, were not yet exhaustive enough, this recent study by OPCW researchers has further raised the question.

Why the Douma false flag still matters?

Washington's propensity to stage provocations as a pretext for a broader war, it is not connected to Douma alone, or to Syria alone.

The pretext that led to the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 it was based entirely on a lie deliberately constructed on fabricated evidence.

And the United States still tries to provoke war in Ukraine, in Venezuela, against Iran, and probably still in Syria, when government forces (and its NDT allies) they begin to take back Idlib.

Understand how US-backed militants staged the Douma attack in 2018; how the Western media lied to the whole world afterwards, to sell the subsequent Western military intervention, and how investigators exposed evidence that revealed this attack as a fake operation (false flag), it will serve everyone to dampen the political impact of future false provocations.

https://oraprosiria.blogspot.com/2019/05/armi-chimiche-e-false-flag.html

source – http://www.centrostudifederici.org/attacco-alla-siria-false-notizie-veri-criminali/