They try everything to block, hinder, delay actions to combat uncontrolled immigration (then some roses, who has never managed even a condominium, He makes it easy and is always ready to criticize or complain, n.d.r.)Important ruling of the Court. Asylum requests submitted before 5 October must be examined with the old rules. In January, protection fell to an all-time low 2 percent. A shower of appeals is predictable
The new restrictive rules on humanitarian protection launched by the security decree cannot be applied to applications that were submitted before 5 October, date of approval of the decree.
This was established by the Court of Cassation with a sentence filed today which could greatly extend the real effects of the security decree on humanitarian protection given that the majority of the applications that were examined ( and rejected) in recent months they have all been presented by the asylum commissions before October. I'm more than 23.000 the migrants who in the last four months have been denied any type of protection in application of the Salvini law and now a rain of appeals is foreseeable.
The latest data from January saw the granting of humanitarian permits collapse 2 percent. They were the 28 percent in May of 2018. Actually, already before the approval of the decree, applying a directive from the Interior Ministry, the territorial commissions had already greatly limited the granting of humanitarian permits, tightening their belts more and more starting from October. But almost all of the applications examined were submitted earlier, given that the average wait before evaluating individual positions is approximately one year.
The ruling from the first civil section of the Supreme Court risks provoking a barrage of appeals, At this point the new rules, who have effectively abolished humanitarianism, they will only be applied to requests ( which are a residual number given that in the meantime landings have decreased by 90 percent) of people disembarked after October.
Examining a migrant's appeal, he fled his country for economic reasons and due to disagreements with his parents, who had his request for humanitarian protection rejected, the Supreme Court wrote that “The legislation introduced with Legislative Decree no. 113 of 2018, converted into law n.132 of 2018, in the part in which it modified the pre-existing regulation of the residence permit for humanitarian reasons, replacing it with the provision of special cases of residence permits – it is the principle of law enunciated by the Supreme Court – does not apply in relation to applications for recognition of a residence permit for humanitarian reasons proposed before the entry into force of the new law, which will therefore be scrutinized on the basis of the legislation existing at the time of their presentation”.
The latest data from January saw the granting of humanitarian permits collapse 2 percent. They were the 28 percent in May of 2018. Actually, already before the approval of the decree, applying a directive from the Interior Ministry, the territorial commissions had already greatly limited the granting of humanitarian permits, tightening their belts more and more starting from October. But almost all of the applications examined were submitted earlier, given that the average wait before evaluating individual positions is approximately one year.
The ruling from the first civil section of the Supreme Court risks provoking a barrage of appeals, At this point the new rules, who have effectively abolished humanitarianism, they will only be applied to requests ( which are a residual number given that in the meantime landings have decreased by 90 percent) of people disembarked after October.
Examining a migrant's appeal, he fled his country for economic reasons and due to disagreements with his parents, who had his request for humanitarian protection rejected, the Supreme Court wrote that “The legislation introduced with Legislative Decree no. 113 of 2018, converted into law n.132 of 2018, in the part in which it modified the pre-existing regulation of the residence permit for humanitarian reasons, replacing it with the provision of special cases of residence permits – it is the principle of law enunciated by the Supreme Court – does not apply in relation to applications for recognition of a residence permit for humanitarian reasons proposed before the entry into force of the new law, which will therefore be scrutinized on the basis of the legislation existing at the time of their presentation”.
