Of Lucia Rezzonico
Pictured from left is the councillor Russian Rosary, with delegation to the Family, the advisor Andrea Bacciga, Costanza Miriano, Matthew Castagna
VERONA – All 18.00 of yesterday, Thursday 18 January 2018, there were already fifty people waiting in Sala Lucchi for the arrival of Costanza Miriano. With a slight delay, the journalist, writer and blogger has arrived, accompanied by the municipal councilor Lawyer. Andrea Bacciga e dal Responsible for Christ the King-Tradition Matthew Castagna. All 18.30 Castagna began the introductions, while the room filled with a heterogeneous audience, which at its peak almost reached one hundred units. The press is present, the regional councilor Andrea Bassi, the President of the IIIrd District Nicolò Zavarise, the traditionalist militants worked at the book and accreditation desk. A great success, both for the contents and for the capacity for involvement that this conference has created around itself, beyond the patronage of the Culture Department of the Scaliger Municipality, to a very interested public. On the sidelines of the public meeting, we had the opportunity to ask Matteo Castagna for some clarification.
How the idea of inviting Costanza Miriano was born?
Last November my friend city councilor Andrea Bacciga donated a series of non-compliant books to the Civic Library, or in any case politically and religiously incorrect with respect to the maistream, including “When we were girls” by Costanza Miriano. A controversy arose in the town hall, which received considerable media attention, which favored the acquaintance between the two and, subsequently, the idea of a public meeting in Verona on the traditional family and the role of man and woman in the family and in society. Who better than a woman, wife and mother of four children, journalist and writer, to talk about this with a cut compatible with ours?
The Verona administration has repeatedly reiterated its no to gender ideology. Mayor Federico Sboarina has made the protection and promotion of the traditional family a qualifying point of his majority's program…
E’ This is what we found ourselves in before last summer's election campaign, compared and found essentially in line. After all, the leading exponents of the current Administration are those with whom we organized the Family Day scaligero, in front of the Arsenal, in June 2015, at the same time as gender pride day. The political program of the next 5 years, as for family ethics, updates and brings back to the foreground, in fact, the spirit and intentions of the well-known motions of the distant 1995, which were always inspired by traditionalist Catholics.
Christus Rex-Traditio has been a consolidated reality for years, especially in the Verona area, who manages to involve a truly varied audience in his initiatives…
These are assumptions and objectives with a specific communication technique. The premise is to spread those purely Catholic themes that modern society has demolished to explain the real motivations, anti-Christ, liberal-communist. The objective is the integral Catholic proselytism that an association of lay people can carry out. The communication technique is precisely that of the maximum possible involvement of all the entities that could be interested (but also those apparently indifferent or contrary). We launch the 360° network. God collects. The ability must be to create curiosity and have clear answers to give. Then we can talk about the methods.
In what sense?
The conference, the conventions, public meetings are moments of aggregation in which those who have something to say do so with the aim of sending one or more messages, according to a specific line of thought, generally on a specific topic aimed at the widest possible audience. The study seminar, education, the academic lesson are instead moments of aggregation that, generally, they are limited to those who already espouse that given idea. In this case, while not excluding anyone, the risk is that on the practical side there is “talk to each other”. This is also useful, for goodness sake, because it consolidates and facilitates in-depth analysis and knowledge of the topics. We do it too, every Tuesday and at certain times. But we prefer direct messages, simple and clear conferences with maximum involvement, that goes from the student to the press, from the professor to the worker, from politician to entrepreneur.
Yesterday with Costanza Miriano how you managed to bring almost 100 people on weekdays, at the end of the afternoon?
There are three factors that make the difference: the name and fame of the speaker, the topic covered, the propaganda. Just in case, we invited a RAI journalist and successful writer, very well known with the reputation of an excellent pen at the service of anti-feminism and the natural family, which are current issues, in these years in which everywhere other models are placed alongside and equal to the institution of marriage for procreation, often terribly immoral, in a total confusion of roles. And “kingdom” without propaganda, dies. We have the grace of having good communicators and different channels. In some circumstances, like last night, we didn't use the video method because we know that there are admirers or detractors who do it for us, helping us in the organization… (Below we report some of them in each other's blogs)
Which was Costanza Miriano's message last night?
It seems to me that it has been understood by everyone and that it has a unique simplicity. As today's Corriere wrote, certainly against the current trend compared to the general trend, Costanza Miriano paraphrased, first the Bible, speaking directly and indirectly about that “male and female God created us, for the maintenance of the species”, which annoys some but is normal for most. Then of S. Paolo: “Let the bride be submissive to her husband and the groom love his wife as Christ loved His Church”. Perhaps more difficult for men… All this is no longer taught, if not a few realities, with grave responsibility of the official hierarchies. In the end, il 68′ as a horrible year that sanctioned the subversion of the natural order, bringing unhappiness and a pseudo-self-determination that masculinized women and effeminate men. Facing a world turned upside down, the answer is to persevere along the straight line of Doctrine and nature.
THE COURIER OF VERONA TODAY, INSERT FROM CORRIERE DELLA SERA:
THE ONLINE NEWSPAPER WWW.VVOX.IT:
«Abortion pill, the real enemy of women»
INTERVIEW, REPORT, PHOTO AND VIDEO OF AN EDITOR OF A COUNCIL NEWSPAPER, “DAILY FAITH”:
On the occasion of the public meeting on "When we were girls... there was a family", organized in Verona by the Christus Rex Traditio cultural club…
********************************************************************
THEN THERE ARE THE OPPOSITE BLOGS, WHY’ THERE WERE ALSO IN THE ROOM, ALTHOUGH TWO OR THREE EXPONENTS OF ARCIGAY ARE VERY SILENT AND RESPECTFUL (PHOTOS AND VIDEOS):
The woman is the floor, man is the wall – Giulia Siviero
Chronicle of a meeting with Costanza Miriano, writer and woman “happily submissive” that he actually said the sentence above [Continues]
http://www.ilpost.it/giuliasiviero/2018/01/19/la-donna-pavimento-luomo-muro/
*********************************************************************
The Municipality of Verona sponsors the neo-fascist conference against "the sodomite minority" Gayburg
I want to point out that the “two, three" people indicated as belonging to Arcigay are not actually part of it, On the contrary, they have dissociated themselves from it for some time. Currently no member of the Arcigay group has felt the need to participate in your conference.
Thanks for the clarification. It appears that we are not updated on the fact that even Arcigay has splits
*has splits. Strange how a powerful body like yours should have grammatical difficulties. In any case, I find myself clarifying again, these are not splits but mainly reasons of mutual aid and politics, some groups of people preferred to break away from Arcigay, which exactly depends on ARCI. According to what I am informed, various of your groups also depend on arci and I would like to point out that we are therefore all under the same roof. I urge you to educate yourself about this system and the ideology of a group before attacking or quoting it, since the latter does not need to be present at your meetings, because he is already old enough and with many other thoughts to develop to be able to stop at your conferences. I also inform you that my tone is mainly conversational, I'm not looking for any affront, but I am only clarifying things of fundamental interest.
The distinguished Sig. Davide, Thank you for the clarifications, which we implement by making them public. The grammatical error, typical of verbal language, he will deserve a punishment that we will inflict following our disciplinary canons and directives…We are not under the same roof because we do not appear to be under any ARCI hat. We are not aware of having attacked the group mentioned. When and if we deem it appropriate, eventually we will, even though we know how influential and listened to it is, especially in Verona. We simply quoted him in perfect good faith, accepting his double rectification, in these comments. Good day.