by Roberto Pecchioli

The Verona families' congress clarified many things. First of all, he agreed with Carl Schmitt: Rarely has the friend-enemy ridge appeared clearer after the hysterical preventive counter-demonstration, the disordered attacks of the grotesque troupe itinerant of the professional indignants in the name of (They) progress, the humiliating embarrassment of the Catholic Church, the distancing of the so-called moderates of liberal origin, the descent into the field of the entire army corps of media sinister, cultural, politico. In the year of the Lord 2019, the family is right-wing. Those who follow us know our idiosyncrasy for the term, the irreducible distance from certain economic and social positions, the annoyance at the delayed police excesses. Nevertheless, the crux of the matter, we say this with sadness, it's all here: noted the massive mobilization, wild, full of resentment from the left and important sectors of the circumspect and liberals, the family has become right-wing.
So is saying that the sun rises every morning and children have a father and a mother. The great writer Gilbert K. Chesterton was a prophet when he said that one should draw his sword to observe that the grass is green in spring. He was also right in recognizing that the family has been defeated by capitalism, this destructive phenomenon whose injustices led in reaction to the birth of communism. The devastating spectacle of hatred, trivial intolerance, the arrival of anti-Italy before the family congress should open the eyes of anyone with eyes to see and brains to think.
The terminal West has found its definitive enemy, the last one to be defeated, the family precisely, with all existential principles, community and moral it represents. It would be more accurate to say that the enemy of transversal progressivism – born on the left, paid right, which it represents, unfortunately, the axis of postmodern societies- it's nature. The real attack, absolute, it is in fact against the empire of nature, the creation of believers. Nothing he has laid down is approved by the contemporary transhuman. Children do not have to have a father and a mother, it is not even good for them to distinguish between boys and girls; sexuality between men and women is just one of many "orientations", the most annoying, since it leads to unwanted births. Those who believe in the "traditional" family(Speaking of which, let's not fall into their trap, that model is not traditional, but natural!) he's a loser – Di Maio dixit, master of thought who miraculously managed to show - opponents of abortion want to lock women up at home and take away their "rights". Homosexuality is beautiful, heteropatriarchy is crap, pregnancy has a social role.
The battle over the founding principles of a society is more important than the economic structure. We have numerous enemies, very powerful and transversal. To Boldrini, Camusso and Bonino have always been joined by exponents of the center and center-right. Statements like that of the Venetian governor Zaia are surprising, according to which “homophobia is a disease, no ifs or buts", the hostile indifference of the liberals, the shyness of the priests. For them, you forget Jesus' exhortation to speak clearly, “your words be yes yes, no no, anything more comes from the evil one", the congressmen are essentially right, but not in the method. Since it doesn't appear that they attacked, insulted, nor prevented the exercise of dissent, we must think that the method appreciated by good fathers is silence, acquiescence, accompanied by a few sighs and rigorous frowns in the chamber of charity.
Eh, no, gentlemen priests and "outgoing" Catholics (by faith?), he who remains silent consents and the display of prudence is the virtue of cowards. The Jesuit Spadaro sentences, great friend of Bergoglio: “family culture cannot be the instrumental part of one culture war”. Forgive us, illustrated servant Jesus, but if the family, in the two millennia of his Church, it was an instrumental culture, you have deceived entire generations. Chi, if not the Catholic Church, would have the weapons to fight a wide-ranging cultural battle, the unbecoming “culture war”, silence and 8 per thousand are better, not really? Let's leave some consecrated people to their business and the annoyance of seeing some lagging Catholic, ill-informed about pastoral news, stubborn to live as a believer.
The truth, sad, it's that we had all the answers, but they changed all the questions and the words to express them. The tones used by the enemy who wants to destroy us, enemy is who the enemy makes, they are so vulgar, disgusting and overexcited to be reminiscent of a terrible post-war intellectual, Ugo Vittorini. One of his books on resistance was entitled Men and not. We're back to this, the quality of human being is revoked without appeal from those who do not think like them. The entire progressive army is now imbued with the worst instincts that it attributes to the hated Other. They are ethical racists, Suprematist, since their reason is unique, self-evident, it needs no demonstration, much less stoop to discussion. They live in an ignorance made up of third-rate clichés: the references to the Middle Ages are so numerous and irritating that any reply is useless.
Who believes in family, it does not sanctify abortion, He is against homosexualism, lives in the Middle Ages. Nothing bad, it was a millennium in which Benedict of Nursia worked, Francis of Assisi, Catherine of Siena, Charlemagne, Dante Alighieri, Frederick II, Tommaso d’Aquino, the time when universities were born, in which the achievements of mathematics and engineering led to the construction of cathedrals, but also to large irrigation and civil engineering works. In the Middle Ages, musical writing and the compass were invented, the first legal codes of navigation were written (Trani, Italy, 1066) and Giotto painted better than the abstract expressionists. However, abortion was not legally permitted and Pier Damiani could rail against clergy sodomy without being reported for homophobia.. He spoke, ohibò, in the name of God, an idea expunged from history as a fruit of the past, that horrible bilge of rubbish from which we freed ourselves.
The lords of progress are leaving a fundamental battle in our hands, not at all confessional, indeed very secular. The ideas of family and marriage are a central element of the entry of human communities into civilization. Destroying them means going back thousands of years, leave the confines of the law – another conquest of civilization – and fall into instincts, in the jungle of "polyamory" dear to globalists like Jacques Attali, return to the darkness of the war of all against all. Here's the point: it is capitalism in its terminal version, the absolute enemy. The family, like the unstructured community, it is the strongest bastion against global commodification, it is the place where everything is not measured in give and take, gross domestic product, double game.
It is the kingdom – the last- of free, of relationships that Ivan Illich defined as convivial, where you take and give without a price tag. Relationships maintained in the absence of calculation of profits and losses displease the neoliberal monster. First they traced everything back, including marriage, to a contract with articles and specifications, penalties and detailed descriptions; now they move on to the further phase, no connection, everything must be liquid, random. The children are products to be ordered on the market, stature, skin color, sex, sorry kind. Obscene catalogs are available online, but the Nazis are not them, Cain's antihuman del progreso, but rather those who call to welcome life, who exposes sexual slavery, the buying and selling of eggs and sperm, the zoological reduction of man, practices such as the rented womb that would have outraged Carlo Marx.
In the end, Adam Smith's words remain the most sincere: individuals stay together only out of interest and "it is not from the benevolence of the butcher and the baker that we will have bread and meat". They intended to pit everyone against everyone, men against women, young versus old, parents (1, 2, 3 as many as we want) against children. Nobody has to be what they are, but what it suggests to him, that is, it imposes, the system. Today you are a woman, straight tomorrow, the day after tomorrow you feel Chinese and next year who knows. It is important to be good consumers, believers and observants of the religion of progress, of purchase and desire.
They renamed themselves champions of love, if we can use the term baptism, obscurantist symbol of religion imposed by parents 1 e 2 to the poor unborn child. They are all love, the other evil dispensers of hatred. The standard bearer of the new crusade of Good, of the Righteous, of Equality and Progress was Barack Obama, who hailed homosexual marriage introduced in the heart of the neoliberal empire as a victory for love. Strange reference, if then everything, starting with marriage, it is treated as a contract to be torn up at will. We will have a timed wedding soon, the problem is what to do with the children. But there is a solution: can be entrusted to cooperatives, collective municipalities or the State, imposing not to let them grow according to natural biological instinct. What is essential is that the family is eradicated: disgusting totalitarianism masquerading as emancipation.
The drug that inhibits natural sexual development before puberty is breathtaking, to be administered already at ten-eleven years old. These are the fruits of "their" love, the sign of progress, the shame of the market ready to sell any rubbish in the name of freedom and, why not, of the sacred rights of consumers in the commercial circus. Euthanasia is also an act of love, in which the Nordic social democracies and the bastions of mercantile ethics such as Holland are at the forefront, in which health insurance companies paid for the campaigns for the legalization of "sweet death".. The sinister shadow of death pervades an exhausted world that calls every whim love and every instinct freedom. Eros and Thanatos, like in the worst nightmares on Dr. Freud's couch.
On the same days as the Verona meeting, in Barcelona, one of the symbolic places of libertarianism, a bus from the local Socialist Party was going around, former champion of workers. In the name of love and unfailing tolerance, Four passwords were written on the sides: anti-fascism, feminism, diversity, pride, with the image of two men intent on kissing. On the other side, per condition pair omo, the kiss between two women. The triggering cause? The rally of a right-wing party, Vox, anti-abortion and enemy of gender ideology. One-way tolerance, especially since in the previous days a bus belonging to the Catholic group Hazteoìr had been fined, Make yourself heard, who fights against abortion without limits even for minors.
In short, here and elsewhere, the battlefield is family morality combined with natural law. On the subject, the tolerant gentlemen, lovers and defenders of freedom, they cannot accept contrary opinions, or better, those imposed without discussion on their gregarious brains by the neoliberal system allied with media and academic progressivism. No cross-examination is allowed in the name of freedom: the so-called open society, Karl Popper theorized it, it is not closed, but closed to dissidents from the distant past. The witch burnings, comically attributed to the Middle Ages and the Catholics, secular ignorance, they are activated again for anyone suspected of not adhering to the postmodern Truth. They are still missing, but they are getting ready, the bonfires of vanity of Renaissance Florence, not medieval, in Gerolamo Savonarola's short season, destined to himself climb the stake of the changing popular moods manipulated by power.
A violent feeling asserts itself, incapable of nuance, unbalanced, adverse to every idea received from the past adhering to nature's plan. The unlimited man hates the time in which he was not present and wants to get rid of every element that comes from that darkness. Today and the near future are lost. A civilization that does not reproduce, culturally and biologically, its fate is already sealed in the medium term. Giuseppe Prezzolini remembered that the conservative – supporter of what is permanent- he may not be the man of tomorrow, but it certainly is the day after tomorrow. The enemy- We have to call it that now- he is giving us a great gift, allowing us to exclusively register the great battles of civilization and culture of the family and natural ethics.
The Verona congress summarized an existential project that, willy-nilly, it is a powerful political program, an exciting cry in defense of life and country. It asks to block the passage of unclean practices such as the rented womb, alias gestation for others (always the politically correct scam). It demands to establish the right for children to have a father and a mother, to receive an education that does not call into question their biological identity, live a childhood and early youth free from early sexualisation. It asks politicians to establish a fund to save families and to safeguard the rights of mothers who decide not to have an abortion, as well as stating what is evident, the nature of human beings of the unborn. It is incredible to claim such obvious facts, but this is where we are.
It is a revolutionary but not extremist program, crazy or a denier of anyone's rights. Whoever says this is in bad faith even if he is a philosopher by profession, like Sebastiano Maffettone, theorist of an unlikely “cat-sovereignism, a radical puritanesimo, certainly fundamentalist and probably old Protestant”. Bum, professor, he made a big statement, a proven proof of the loss of prestige of philosophy which has become a verbal game. In conclusion, the President of the Chamber Roberto Fico is wiser, which, from the top of his position, invites us to take note that the family has changed, therefore it is necessary to "adapt". Already, adapting is much more… Cool. No, even if all of us don't, proclaimed a battle song.
We will not adapt. Because it's not right, because we are convinced that we have excellent reasons and however the battle goes, we will leave a trace, unlike the cowards, of deserters, of opportunists. In the end, because when you represent a just cause (quasi) lost, you have to blow the trumpet, jump on horseback and attempt the last sortie, without which one dies of old age at the bottom of a forgotten fortress that no one besieges because it has been abandoned by life.