Which testifies to the equality of the two sexes in the eyes of God, in the Catholic religion. But equality of dignity does not mean identical mission! To each his own job and the cows will be well looked after! – says a French proverb.
Unfortunately, this distinction of the sexes and their destiny does not satisfy our contemporary genderophilic and nihilistic society, which wants to make a clean sweep of every tradition, habit, Christian and natural uses and customs.
The world's assaults to impose an artificial feminization of ecclesial society, in tune with what is happening in the civil sphere, they multiply. Lately, two facts testify to these repeated attacks. And when it comes to destroying Catholic or even natural landmarks, Cardinal Schönborn, the “great theologian” of Pope Francis (Antipope, n.d.r.), it's never very far away …
Last 1 April, he granted ainterview to a group of Austrian journalists, belonging, among others, al Die Presse e al Salzburger Nachrichten. He declared to them that he was open to the idea of ​​married priests and the ordination of women to the ministry of deacons, of presbyters and, why not, of the bishops.

We are faced with an attack against the apostolic letter Priestly ordination, with which, without council, Pope John Paul II confirmed that

On that occasion, John Paul II wasn't saying anything new: the Code of Canon Law of 1917, later taken up by the Code of 1983, sanctioned that "only the baptized man validly receives holy ordination" - can. 968 § 1.
Saint Thomas Aquinas considers the female sex as an impediment to receiving Holy Orders; by Pius XII, in his Apostolic Constitution Sacrament of Order of the 30 November 1947, in which he talks about the sacred orders of the diaconate, of the presbyterate and the episcopate, Affirma che "The Church has no power over the substance of the Sacraments.", that is in those things, witnesses to the sources of divine revelation, Christ the Lord himself decided to be kept in the sacramental sign. (The Church has no power over the substance of the Sacraments, that is, it is about everything that, as witnessed by the sources of divine Revelation, it was established by Christ the Lord himself as a sacramental sign).
Ora, Christ chose only men at the moment of the institution of the Sacrament of Orders.
Since the conciliar Cardinal Schönborn adheres to the process of upheaval based on the conciliar notions of the evolution of dogma - the living Tradition - it is evident that the aforementioned teachings cannot have any hold on him. Moreover, it is notable that his statements contrary to the decision of John Paul II, demonstrate that the conciliar magisterium cannot be infallible, which is completely logical since it is claimed that everything evolves.
The conciliar serpent bites its own tail: for its inherent contradictions and for those resulting from the conciliar popes!
Another one declaration, this time formulated under the inspiration of Pope Francis (Antipope, n.d.r.), reinforces the place that feminists have ended up occupying in the official Church in recent decades. Less radical than that of the cardinal (conciliar cardinal, n.d.r.) Schönborn, it opens the door in a similar but more subtle way to future sexist upheavals.
The Pontifical Commission for Latin America, presided over by Cardinal Ouellet and assembled by 6 al 9 last March on the theme of women, pillar in the building of the Church and society in Latin America, in his final document he recommends that a synod on the topic of women be held soon, to rethink its role in the life and mission of the Church: to "free" the latter "from prejudices, from the stereotypes and discrimination suffered by women" and move Christian communities towards "a "pastoral conversion" capable of asking for forgiveness for all the situations in which they have been and still are complicit in attacks on their dignity".
The Commission advances in support of "this opening" the fact that this does not "represent a concession to cultural and media pressure", but it is rather «the result of the awareness that the absence of women from decision-making bodies is a defect, an ecclesiological gap, the negative effect of a clerical and chauvinistic conception."
Awareness that nevertheless follows the modern trend! The conciliar Church, with this language, adheres fully, even if he feebly shields himself from it, to the feminist MeToo mentality, embodiment of gender theory that is subverting society and traditional structures. And the text specifies that this openness is also necessary for the good of souls: «If it isn't remedied in the short term, many women available to serve will feel neglected and despised in their abilities, and could eventually distance themselves from the Church".
Progressive and modernist clerics have been making this stale excuse since Vatican II, this false pretext, to impose their doctrinal innovations, contrary to Tradition. Which, However, it did not prevent some faithful from leaving the Church, On the contrary, the new religion built by them to further promote apostasy, it has put Catholics in the position where they no longer know which saint to turn to, having lost every certain reference…
And this fatal slide on the inclined plane does not seem to stop with Pope (Antipope, n.d.r.) Francesco.