Of Alejandro Sanchez
Putin: It is my duty to attack the New World Order for degrading "family values".
De Sade's sadistic society and the foundations of anti-natural-moral-ethical-logical thought
Putin: As head of state my duty to maintain traditional values ​​and traditional family values.This is because? Because same-sex marriages will not produce any children. God has decided and we must worry about the birth rate in our country. We must strengthen families. This does not mean that there is persecution against anyone.".
Putin has dealt a fundamental blow to the ideology underlying the New World Order with respect to family values. This simply can't be better.
This is equally true for Sigmund Freud, che by Wilhelm Reich, per Aleister Crowley, per Timothy Leary, per Betty Friedan, by Gloria Steinem, per Eve Ensler, for Rosa Luxemburg, for Andrea Bronfman and other theorists who saw family values ​​as a threat to civilization. Note that Putin's proposal consists of two parts: 1) No one has the right to attack family values ​​and 2) no one has the right to persecute people because of their sexual orientation.
This is actually a conception of life and is perfectly congruent with practical reason. The sad fact is that there were a plethora of theorists at the dawn of the 20th century who hated practical reason. They did not want to subordinate their desire or appetite to the moral order, so they created a series of concrete rationalizations to justify their conduct.
More importantly, these theorists have desperately tried to impose their essentially perverse cosmic vision on the majority of people around the world. These theorists deliberately ignored the fact that there is a moral order, philosophical, scientific, ethical and aesthetic.
A particular theorist who metaphysically ignored these moral orders, at the dawn of the French Revolution it was the Marquis De Sade, a revolutionary philosopher and decadent writer who turned sexuality inside out. In Dorm Philosophy, De Sade was setting the stage for people like Freud and Wilhelm Reich , in particular in his works Sade brought psychologists an exceptional document on the states of the mind and its perversions, and the surrealists recognized in him the symbol of the man who rebels against all prohibitions. Sade's "thought" also had a political character, which brought him closer to the entire current of libertines, so vigorous in the 18th century and in the previous one. Sade who wants to reconcile Eros and nature (« Everything is in nature», he claims ), he opposed deism as well as the Supreme Being of Robespierre, who wanted to found a new order while Sade, that he didn't want any, he accused him of wanting to suffocate the total revolution, which must also have been that of costumes. This is what he expresses in his famous text, “French, one more effort!”, included in his work “The Philosophy of the Boudoir”.
Sade in the Philosophy of the Boudoir.
The spirit of crime is linked in Sade to a disproportionate dream of denial, of every denial: his destructive project infinitely surpasses men. If the "sadistic" man seems singularly free towards his victims, on which his pleasures depend, the violence towards these victims goes beyond them and aims only to frantically verify the very destructive act with which "he reduced God and the world to nothing" (Maurice Blanchot)
Here as in other places, Sade was pursuing the logical work of the philosophy of illustration, that like feminism, it promised superficial freedom but delivered moral and intellectual slavery.
If morality does not exist, as Darwin and others will postulate later , who goes to decide that De Sade was wrong? If man is just a machine and nothing more, it is a machine that has delivered the human race to moral and intellectual slavery. As the writers of the Illustration such as d'Holbach and Helvitius argue, who goes around and decides that rape is a crime or that sexually abusing or torturing children is abhorrent ? Sade declared again: “How dare man? And what is the difference between him and plants, between him and all the animals of the world? None obviously for De Sade.
Just as there is no real difference between him, man and plants, or included with animals for the case- Sade proceeded to cross the ideological Rubicon, to never return to mental health. “Women are nothing more than machines designed for voluptuousness”, he said. As a metaphysical principle, "voluptuous people of all ages and sexes must listen only to the "delicious passions that drive them and that their source is the only one that will lead to happiness".
Camille Paglia stated that Sade actually changed Mother Nature: Russeau relives the Great Mother, but Sade restores his true ferocity. That is Darwin's naturalness, nature red in teeth and claws.
Building his work on Greek mythology known as the Oedipus complex, Freud universally postulated that: Oedipus' Destiny moves us only because it could have been ours, because the oracle has placed upon us , before we were born, the very curse that rested upon him. (……………)
Bene, Putin has defied all these diabolical principles by appealing to the moral order to suit his case. Looking at the basic biology it is correctly deduced that, if the following generation survives, the Government must maintain or even foment “traditional values ​​and family values…”We must worry about the birth rate in our country. We must strengthen families".
If same-sex marriages do not produce children, then it is perfectly logical to hold firm to family values, which must be one of the work tasks for the state too. Obviously this is one of the reasons why the agents of the New World Order hate Vladimir Putin.
Source: https://www.controinformazione.info/putin-e-mio-dovere-attaccare-il-nuovo-ordine-mondiale-per-aver-fatto-degradare-i-valori-della-famiglia/