Catholics between Europeanism and Populism

"Cattolici tra europeismo e populismo. La sfida al nichilismo", the book by Matteo Castagna | lafedequotidiana.it
by

THE REVIEW
Of Michele M. Ippolito, director of “Daily Faith”
“Catholics between Europeanism and populism. The challenge to nihilism” is the new book by Matteo Castagna (Solfanelli Editions, pages 248, € 17).
Although the author is not a professional historian, Castagna making use of the comparison with the best contemporary theoretical production, try to understand Italian history, Western and Catholic by reducing the unilateral and misleading interpretations of those who tend to smooth over the great conflict between integral Catholicism and modernism, flared up at the end of the nineteenth century, “which then continued in the final conflict between the Pacellian front and Montini's Christian Democratic front, great politician but weak theologian, disciple of Maritain's secularist and globalist ecumenism".
Veronese, married, class 1976, collaborator of Veronanews, Vvox e The Truth, Matthew Castagna, He defines himself as one of the Catholics faithful to Tradition who began to be interested in politics 14 years (until he is elected, In the 1998, as councilor of the third district of Verona, being the youngest in the city).
In this, his first book as a single author, which contains a post by Giacomo Bergamaschi and an array of notable quotations, the final proposal is remembered by Castagna himself: “the models of Italian and Portuguese Fascism intended to oppose a model of modernist and revolutionary civilization through a clear counter-revolution, with the affirmation of a modern counter-reformist political and social culture, not theocratic or merely neo-medieval, aimed at the modern establishment of a Catholic corporatist state".
Castagna defines these two fascisms as neither reactionary nor conservative but traditionalist and counter-revolutionary regimes "that is to say orthodoxly counter-reformist since, although they recognized themselves in the values ​​of tradition, they did not consider it appropriate to restore the old regime sic et simpliciter in the context". Read More

Share
Catholicism | CHRIST THE KING - TRADITIO

La linea di "Christus Rex-Traditio" and Holy Orders
by

Image results for 5 antipapi
Of Matthew Castagna
Even if few, sometimes divided or disorganized due to human miseries, perhaps because the Devil strikes where there is the integrity of the Faith and, Therefore, puts its tail among the defects and shortcomings of the children of Light, Catholic Tradition is more alive than ever, because he cannot die, because he is militant and present in the world.
Anachronistic attacks, a bit’ coarse, certainly ridiculous but harsh of the left and the historical enemies of Jesus and His Church, who are concentrating against us and our friends, just these days, demonstrate how the force of Truth, publicly testified (and not relegated to individual consciousness or hidden in speakers) is disruptive and is stirring the bile of atheists, liberals, anticlerical, gendered, Stalin's godchildren.
As I write in my book, even today we must take a stand. You have to know which side you're on, without locking ourselves into the useless intellectualism of those who fear action, in the fear of quiet living, in alienation from reality, in the warmth of your own well-fenced garden, in the ecumenist confusion, in the illusion of the primacy of numbers over unity in Truth, in personalism, in selfishness, in mental closure, in brandishing swords blunted by doctrinal ambiguity or, really, morale. Theosophy and esotericism, of every order and degree are bodies foreign to Tradition, a serious damage to souls, which every fundamentalist has the obligation not to profess or divulge.
Yesterday, like today, we are Integral Roman Apostolic Catholics, that is, entirely Catholic. We are integralists, as she wanted it “flat line” of the “Piano membership” of Mons. Umberto Benigni, albeit updated by changed circumstances. (find the program of “Piano membership” to the site button: “WHO WE ARE”)
We are political heirs of whom, in the 20th century, he stood in defense of tradition (with all due and proper distinctions) favoring the Catholic Church, building banks against materialist communism, all’ateismo, all’technicist americanism, to liberalism, to freemasonry, to occult powers, all’ “white international”, in all its facets, to preconceived or radical anti-fascism, which today are expressed in “Europeanist globalism”. Read More

Share
Catholics between Europeanism and Populism

And then, Which side are the Catholics on??
by

REVIEW OF THE BOOK BY MATTEO CASTAGNA
Of Mattia Rossi per The newspaper OFF of The newspaper
It caused a sensation, some time ago, the cover of Christian family against the Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini («Go behind Salvini», it stood out on the cover under the photograph of the Northern League leader). Shortly after, but, the newspaper poll Libero: 85% of Catholics would be in favor of the Minister's policies
And then, which side are they on? (or they have to stay) the Catholics? With what, commonly, is defined as populism or with the pro-European globalism? And southern fascism? Where to position yourself for those who profess to be Catholic? But then, as Catholics? Those of the modernist official hierarchies or those "integral" and faithful to the Catholic Magisterium of all time?
He tries to give the answers Matthew Castagna, journalist and militant Catholic (responsible for the Sedevacantist-oriented “Christus Rex – Traditio” club) in his Catholics between Europeanism and populism. The challenge to nihilism (Solfanelli, pages. 248, euro 17) recently in the bookstore.
Ascertained immediately, from Castagna, that «a “progressive Catholicism” cannot exist» and that «the only possible Catholicism is the “integral” one», There are numerous doctrines that the Veronese journalist reviews (Savonarolism, counter-reformism, the second Francoism, the neo-Lutheranism of Nazism) and then move to the Catholic side in the chapter Integral Catholics, Jesuits, modernist, clerical-fascists.
Catholic integralism, explains Castagna, «perceives in white-Jesuit internationalism, Christian Democrat-Modernist is the political and theological instrument through which the greatest attack is manifesting itself, never conceived, to Christianity". It follows that, according to the author, «the fundamental danger of the Jesuit-modernist union would be represented, per mons. Benign, from the end of the social disintegration of the Western Constantinian and Gregorian Tradition; from absolute and dogmatic anti-fascism; from left-wing Christian Democrats; from fanatical and relativistic technical-pragmatic and politicistic anthropocentrism; from the rejection of the XXIV theses of Thomism; all of this, if achieved with the victory of international anti-fascism, it would have led to neo-modernist nihilism and secularization”. Read More

Share
FIFTH COLUMN | Non-fiction

Bergoglio contro i "cani selvaggi"
by

The demonstration of how a non-believer can reach shared analyzes and conclusions on the work of Bergoglio and the Counter-Church, without going so far as to define it as such. We know that and we remember that. But the part about the Council is really excellent.
FIFTH COLUMN
Of Marcello Veneziani
No, Holiness, a Pope cannot call “wild dogs” the next one, especially when it comes to Catholics, Christians, believers. Dogs is the derogatory definition that Muslims give of infidels and Christians. Even the most ruthless terrorists were defined by the pontiffs who preceded Francis, “men of the Red Brigades”, ISIS men. More cups. To descend to those lustful levels is not worthy of a Holy Father. Silence and prayer were the most dignified responses.
For goodness sake, let's not be beautiful souls. We know what a vermin there is in the intestines of the curia and in the slums of the Church. The pedophilia racket, like the gay lobby that Bergoglio himself once mentioned, these are just some of the dark sides of the Church. That pedophilia whose proportions are disconcerting, collegiality, mutual complicity, before its single and very frequent episodes. But beyond those murky turns that concern the sexual sphere there are at least two others: one focused on malfeasance and the other on the no-holds-barred war to conquer roles of clerical power. Tours that are certainly not born with Pope Bergoglio but they are the b-side of the Church, its face corrupted and has presented itself with ups and downs for several centuries, with a special emphasis since atheism and nihilism have also corroded faith within the sacred doors of the Church. One would want to invoke the dogs to heal the Church but the dogs of the Lord, what the Dominicans called themselves, to which the most brilliant Doctor of the Church also belonged, San Tommaso d’Aquino. Read More

Share
STUDY CENTER FEDERICI

Cent'anni dalla parte sbagliata
by

Image results for Bruno SegreReporting of Federici Studies Center

We report an interview that Bruno Segre released to the newspaper “La Stampa” for his hundredth birthday. The errors of secularism and anticlericalism emerge in the responses in a transversal way (like the Masonic sects that have always professed and spread these errors) they are present in the programs of several Italian parties, from far left to far right.
They are the errors that fought and overthrew the social kingdom of Christ, the only reference that a Catholic should have in the political and social sphere. In the interview Segre defends the divorce, euthanasia and civil unions, accuses the Catholic Church of "inadmissible privileges" and hopes for an increasingly stronger public school system (against denominational schools). The lawyer ends the meeting with a petty blasphemous expression. Our wish for him is to get on the right side at least in the last days of his life, to avoid the eternal mortal embrace with that Satan who, in his long life, he contributed to reigning in the Italian state.
Bruno Segre: “My battles for rights in Turin with a thousand faces”. One hundred years of the lawyer, a life of political and civil commitment (interview by Alberto Sinigaglia, The Press of 3/9/2018, pag. 25)
He interviewed Magnani and Totò, Josephine Baker naked and the "teacher with the red pen" dressed: Bruno Segre dreamed of being a journalist, it seemed like a good job to him. But he chose to be a lawyer and was the first to defend a conscientious objector. He started in 1949 twenty years of battles that would have established that right. Then, alongside Loris Fortuna, worked towards the introduction of divorce. Tomorrow he turns one hundred years of a high intensity life: friendship with Natalia Ginzburg in high school, the meetings with Pavese, graduating with Luigi Einaudi, the humiliations of the racial laws, anti-fascism, two arrests, the escape, the bullet stopped by the cigarette case, prison in the political slaughterhouse in Via Asti, free thought as faith and mission. How many things he has seen change? Energetic and lucid, it starts from Turin, where he was a municipal councilor elected in 1975 in the ranks of the PSI, when eighteen-year-olds voted for the first time. Objectives achieved: September Music, Green dots, Summer guys. Dreamed goals: two subway lines.

Read More

Share
BERGOGLIADI | Catholicism

Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy
by

of the Prof. Roberto De Mattei

The lawfulness of the death penalty is a truth to be held by faith, defined by the ordinary and universal Magisterium of the Church, in a constant and unequivocal manner. Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy.

The teaching of the Church was clearly expressed in the letter of 18 December 1208, in which Innocent III condemns the Waldensian position, with these words, reported by Denzinger: «We assert a secular power, that without mortal sin he can exercise the judgment of blood, provided that I do not hate to take revenge, but by judgment, not carelessly, but let him proceed in consultation» ( A handbook of symbols,definitions and declarations on matters of faith and morals, edited by Peter Hünermann S.J., n. 795). (As for secular power, we affirm that the death penalty can be exercised without mortal sin, provided that revenge is exercised not out of hatred, but by judgment, not in an imprudent way, but in moderation).

The same position was reiterated by Catechism of the Council of Trent (Part three, n. 328), dal Catechism maggiore of Saint Pius (Part three, n. 413) and from the new Catechism of the Catholic Church (n. 2267) (albeit invalid because legislated by illegitimate authorities, n.d.r.). Pope Francis (Il “not-pope” Francesco, n.d.r.) he has now signed a rescript that modifies the Catechism (of the Conciliar Counter-Church itself, n.d.r.) with this new formulation: «The Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that 'the death penalty is inadmissible because it attacks the inviolability and dignity of the person', and is committed with determination to its abolition throughout the world». Read More

Share
CLEAN HANDS | Monsters council

Bergoglio abolisce la "pena di morte", against the entire Tradition of the Church
by

Report Zenit

AGAINST THE TRADITION OF THE CHURCH, AGAINST THE DOCTORS OF THE CHURCH, AGAINST THE CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE COMMANDMENT “DO NOT KILL”, AGAINST S. TOMMASO D’AQUINO, BERGOGLIO INVENTS ANOTHER AMENITIES’ FOR HIS CHURCH, MORE AND MORE’ FAR FROM THE RIGHTS OF GOD AND EVER MORE’ CLOSE TO AN ABSURD ANTHROPOCENTRISM WITH A LIBERAL-MASONIC FLAVOR (N.D.R.)

“The death penalty is unacceptable”

New editing of the n. 2267 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church (conciliate, n.d.r.) sulla pena di morte Rescriptum "ex Audentia SS.mi"

Read More

Share
Actuality | Monsters council

Eight per thousand: il "record" negativo c'è stato con Bergoglio
by

In reading, the reader should consider that the author of the text is a sedeplenist, therefore he attributes Catholic ecclesiastical titles to the conciliars (n.d.r.)
Of Giuseppe Aloisi
Il 2017 it was the year in which Italians decided to allocate less of theirs 8 per thousand per Catholic Church (conciliate, n.d.r.)
Pope Francis, in that period, he was in his fourth year under the throne of Peter. It will take some time to know the statistics for the current year.
Right: with the former archbishop of Buenos Aires at the top of the Vatican, at least in the initial stages of the pontificate, there has been a real recovery in numbers. Then, but, the was touched “record” negatively. It seems to have the same descent concerned the quantity of people who went to the hearings during the Argentine's first five-year term.
This and other data on’8 for a thousand they were dissected by the Vatican expert Sandro Magister on his blog de The Espresso. Curious to note how to reach the greatest number of memberships’ it was, during the 2011, papa Joseph Ratzinger, that much of the media neoliberal they described him instead as a theologian “difficile” and incapable of arousing any sympathy in the faithful. The same Benedict XVI, needs to be specified, he was the pontiff under whose reign subscriptions suffered a setback: it happened during the last year as Pope of “mild professor” of Tübingen. Read More

Share
Catholicism | Monsters council

Comparison between the Catholic Church and the false conciliar Church
by

Of Father Maria Romualdo Lafitte
TRUE CATHOLIC CHURCH FALSE CHURCH OF BERGOGLIO
Dal 0 until 1958, Dal 1958 until now Our Lord until Pius XII 6 Antipapi: and “John XXIII” a “Francis I”
 
Image results for Pius XII
Rosario: 15 mystery 20 mystery
Sodomy: Unnatural abomination, 1 of the 4 sins that cry out No more
vengeance before God (Catechism of Saint Pius)
Onanismo, contraception, masturbation : Against nature No more
6o / 9a cdti: fornication (pre-marital reports), adultery: mortal sins No more
Priests celibates, unmarried Now they can Read More

Share
Catholicism | CHRIST THE KING - TRADITIO

Of Calumny and Judgment
by

Image results for slander and judgmentThe first, commendable contribution of one of our new militants
Of Luca Sbroffoni
Don Carlo Tommaso Dragone (Requiem…) -in “Explanation of the Catechism of Saint Pius. For catechists”, CLS-, offers us a definition of some bad actions that unfortunately reign supreme in society (media, politics, ecc.) and also in the “traditionalist” microcosm, certainly favored by a reckless use of social media, in which everyone, behind a keyboard, he can undisturbed attack everything and everyone, condemn, judge, without a minimum of fraternal Christian charity.
So let's see what Father Dragone tells us about it: “It is a sin of slander when you attribute to others faults or defects that they do not have, or the ones he has are exaggerated... Slander is a serious fault when he falsely attributes serious faults to others, or even light but which cause serious damage…
Deduction -Father Dragone continues- “means to deduct, take something away from your neighbor's good name, revealing real flaws and shortcomings, without necessity; the deduction is also called murmur. When untrue sins and defects are attributed to others, there is slander; when real sins and defects are attributed to absent people, there is deduction or murmuring; when finally a sin or defect is accused of a person present, there is contumelia. The deduction that unnecessarily spreads knowledge of serious faults, it is a grave sin; if of light sins, it's venial. It is permissible to express the evil of others when there is a just reason, how to avoid damage to third parties… Read More

Share
1 2