Let's consider that Danilo Quinto is not a sedevacantist, but it poses serious questions on the problem of Authority in the Church and makes analyzes and observations that are widely shared.
Written and reported by Danilo Quinto
On #migrants, Bergoglio says the same things as Emma Bonino, of George Soros and the entire left condemned by history and anti-Christ. He doesn't want to be pope, defend and pass on the faith. He wants to be a politician.
Inserting itself into the debate of recent days on the Acquarius ship and on the impeccable position taken by the Italian Government and in particular by the Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini, Bergoglio claims that “migrants can enrich our society”. Read More
Of Marco Tosatti “The style of the Court” has been informed of some news which, if confirmed, appears very interesting, given the climate we live in these days following government decisions to curb human trafficking, and the – lucrative – activities of NGOs. The CEI has sent all the Bishops sheets to fill out to collect information on how many asylum seekers have been welcomed by them, dove, in which facilities and so on.
Let us not forget that the Church and collateral organizations are strongly interested in this substantial business.
Anyone wishing to have more detailed information, in the silence of the mainstream media (but how could it be otherwise? A son of the owner of the largest Italian publishing group is the director of an NGO that has two ships involved in trafficking…) you can read this three-part investigation by colleague Francesca Totolo. Part One Part two Part Three Instead, let's read what Pezzo Grosso has to say about it...:Read More
Beyond legitimate theological disquisitions, facts matter. From today the Vatican occupied by the conciliars is an official satellite of the supranational powers in all respects. It can't be the Catholic Church! (n.d.r.) by Roberto PECCHIOLI
New air in the Holy See. In the same days of June, two events feature the two thousand year old Church founded by Jesus Christ ( not the Catholic Church, but the Church occupied by the modernists! n.d.r.). No spirituality, much less care for souls. While Bergoglio receives the leaders of the Seven Sisters in the Vatican, fossil energy giants like Exxon, Royal Dutch, the Rockefeller family, all gentlemen of very uncertain devotion but very certain power, his most important collaborator, Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin is admitted to the annual meeting of the Bilderberg Club.
The merry band meets behind closed doors and in the usual ostentatious privacy 66 years. This year the honor of hosting the event falls to Turin, the city of Lambs. The members of the circle are the most conspicuous representatives of the oligarchies in power: bankers, financiers, shareholders and top executives of multinationals, their political butlers and journalism clerics embedded. The topics covered, as always, they are the political agenda, economical, cultural to impose on much of the world. After decades, the invitation of this exclusive lodge, anything but versed in religious affairs, it extended to the Vatican foreign minister. Read More
Of Luciano Gallina
Open letter to: The Gazzettino of Padua Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padua PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin Councilor of the Municipality of Padua Eleonora Mosco Jorge Mario Bergoglio House of Saint Martha
Treviso 05-06-2018 WHO AM I TO JUDGE
I am writing in reference to the two letters published by the Gazzettino on the reserved page "readers' mail". The two letters deal with the same topic but from two different points of view, the authors are: Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padova and the PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin.
Since Bergoglio pronounced the phrase: WHO AM I TO JUDGE, the same was brandished as a banner of freedom.
What does freedom mean?
What does it mean to judge?
If freedom, it means doing what you want and/or what you think is right, from this moment we close all the courts and NO ONE is allowed to judge anyone for any reason. Read More
Report Roman correspondence
(Benedetta Frigerio, The New Daily Compass – 3 June 2018) Where did the medical approach clearly revealed to the world by little Alfie Evans come from?? The answer for Dr. Paul Byrne, internationally renowned neonatologist, that in December of 2017 called by the child's family he flew to Liverpool to visit him, has been clear for years: «Everything starts from the definition of death, no longer clinical but cerebral, sanctioned in 1968 by a Harvard medical commission". Doctor Byrne, explain to us why you differentiate real death from brain death and what implications this distinction has?
I started an intensive care unit for sick children in 1963 at the Cardinal Glendon Hospital for Childrend in St. Louis, I was deeply motivated by the intention to sustain life in every way possible. During this period, New therapies have been discovered. But a few years later a new definition of death began to spread: the patient was no longer considered dead until the cessation of cardiac and circulatory functions, therefore also respiratory and nervous system, but it was enough to detect the absence of activity of the brain to declare him dead. In the 1975 A premature baby was admitted to my ward, Joseph. He was ventilated and then declared brain dead because his electroencephalogram showed no signs of activity. But Joseph was alive, so I continued to treat him: today he is the father of three children. From that moment I began to question the definition of brain death, finding out it was a lie. Read More
Introduction to the chapter of the Social History of the Church by Msgr. Benigni dedicated to the great pontiff Saint Gregory VII.
Henry IV and Gregory VII (1073-85) up to Canossa (1077).
Hildebrand's election took place on the same day that Alexander II went underground. It was an acclamation of the clergy and the people who wanted him to be the successor of the five popes that Hildebrand had encouraged to reform the Church.. This reform was now irresistibly mature, and as always happens with a profound religious movement, political tendencies penetrated it and led the harsh political and social struggle with them.
Those sectarians of the Errician struggle who brought out the accusation of simony for the election of Gregory VII, they were miserable slanderers. Today there is no wise historian who doubts it. The force of things imposed the choice of those who had powerfully improvised the dominating movement.
They all declined, at the same time they became useless: there is no one who does good, it is not until one. You see, Deus, you will lead them into the pit of destruction(Sal 52, 4; 54, 24).
«They have all gone astray, together they became useless: there is no one who does good, there isn't even one. Ma you, oh God, you will end them in an abyss of ruin". Whoever deviates from the right path of Catholic doctrine and practice not only makes himself useless and foolish, but he also runs the risk of falling into Hell with all those who follow him. But how is it possible that a large part of the Catholic hierarchy has failed in its task and is miserably adrift? There has to be an explanation. A purely chronological fact indicates that the current leaders of the Church were formed - coincidentally - after the Second Vatican Council. In a synthetic way, it can be said that in the last half century a theological education has been imposed, a liturgical form and pastoral practice that have assumed and incorporated contradiction, subjectivism and relativism, deforming the minds of the clerics and making them accustomed to them. Read More
Jorge Mario Bergoglio continues the work of demolishing the Catholic faith undertaken by the Second Vatican Council. Indeed, in the footsteps of Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI, Bergoglio adheres to the modernist errors expressed in the “The declaration Nostra aetate” on the Church's relations with non-Christian religions, of the 28/10/1965. It would be absurd to criticize the modernist Bergoglio in the name of the alleged orthodoxy of the modernist John Paul II and the modernist Benedict XVI, as, albeit in different ways and styles, they have expressed and express the same errors condemned by the Church. Even more serious would be to recognize them as legitimate pontiffs of the Church and then attribute the heresies of modernism to them: this is an increasingly widespread error in "traditionalism" by the followers of Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira (which appear under multiple acronyms that pop up like mushrooms) and by the followers of Lefebvrism (inside and outside the SSPX), in recent years in increasingly close collaboration with each other.
Bergoglio: thank you for the religious leaders who cultivate the culture of encounter
Francesco, before the general audience, met a delegation of Buddhists, Hindus, giainisti e sikh, in Rome for a conference on “Dharma and Logos, dialogue and collaboration in a complex era" and then a group of Buddhist monks from Thailand
Vatican City – “Dialogue and collaboration” are key words today, in a time that “has seen growing tensions and conflicts, with widespread violence on both a small and large scale”. Francesco remembered it in the morning, before the general audience, meeting a delegation of Buddhists in Santa Marta, Hindus, giainisti e sikh, who participated yesterday in a conference on “Dharma and Logos, dialogue and collaboration in a complex era", organized by the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, the National Office for Ecumenism and Interreligious Dialogue of the CEI, the Italian Buddhist Union, the Italian Hindu Union, the Sikhi Sewa Society and the Institute of Jainology. Bergoglio congratulates the initiative, underlining that it is a reason to thank God when religious leaders commit themselves to cultivating the culture of encounter and give an example of dialogue and actively collaborate in the service of life, of human dignity and the protection of creation.
Before invoking "abundant blessings" on all those present, the Pontiff thanks them for what they are doing "collaborating together according to their respective religious traditions, for the promotion of good in this world of ours".
Pope Leo XIII in I have learned enough he states: Jesus Christ established in the Church a "vivo, authentic and perennial teaching”, which he himself strengthened with his power, he informed of the spirit of truth and authenticated with miracles; and he wanted and commanded that the precepts of his doctrine should be received as his own. Therefore every time this magisterium declares that this or that dogma is contained in the body of divinely revealed doctrine, everyone must take it as true, so long as, if it could be fake, it would follow that God himself would be the author of man's error, which is repugnant: “O Lord, if there is an error, we were deceived by you” [Richard of St. Victor, By Trin., lib. I, cap. 2]. So, every reason to doubt has been removed, who will ever be allowed to repudiate even one of these truths, without his falling into heresy and without that, being separated from the Church, rejects all Christian doctrine on the whole? Indeed, such is the nature of faith that nothing is so repugnant to it as admitting one dogma and repudiating another. In fact, the Church openly declares that faith is a "supernatural virtue, with which, inspired and helped by the grace of God, we believe that the things he revealed are true, not for the intrinsic truth of the same known with the natural light of reason, but by the authority of the revealing God himself, who cannot deceive or be deceived” [Conc. Vat., sess. III, cap. 3]. Therefore, if a truth is known to have been revealed by God, and yet it is not believed, it follows that nothing at all is believed by divine faith. In fact, what James the Apostle sentences regarding the crime in matters of morals, must assert itself about an erroneous opinion on matters of faith: “Anyone will have missed only one point, he was guilty of all”. On the contrary, with greater reason it must be said of this than of that. Indeed, less properly the whole law is said to have been violated by one who transgressed it in one thing alone, not being able to see themselves in him, if not by interpreting its will, a contempt for the majesty of God the legislator. Instead he who, even in just one point, disagrees with revealed truths, he has completely lost his faith, as it refuses to venerate God as the supreme truth and proper reason for faith; therefore Augustine says: “In many things they agree with me, in some few no; but for those few things in which they do not agree with me, The many things in which they agree with me are of no use to them”[S. Augustine, In Psal. LIV, n. 19]. And with reason; because those who take from the Christian doctrine what they like, they are based not on faith, but on one's own judgement: and not "bringing all one's intellect back to obedience to Christ”(1Cor 10,5), they obey themselves more properly than God. “Oh, said Augustine, that you believe what you want in the Gospel, and don't believe what you don't want, believe yourselves rather than the Gospel” [S. Augustine, lib. XVII, Against Faustus the Manichean, cap. 3]. End of quote.
Of Editorial team
As expected, a delegation of was enough soli 5 traditionalist Catholics to send the parishioners of the town of Arcole into a tailspin (province of Verona, diocese of Vicenza) and to desist from the promised public confrontation “don” Diego Castagna, actor of a falsely crucified Jesus in a Via Crucis for migrants, against femicide and for the right to work.
What do these themes have to do with the Way of the Cross, which should be a pious devotion to the Passion of Our Lord who died on the Cross after atrocious suffering for the redemption of the world in expiation of its many sins? Because this sacrilegious theatricalization of such a painful moment and usually devoted to penance?
Yesterday morning, after having agreed by telephone, we went in front of the church of Arcole to ask the protagonist of this show these things, after the newspaper L'Arena had already written on Easter Eve, in general terms, of our disapproval, as well as, with further clarifications, the online newspaper www.veronanews.net . Even some national newspapers and politicians spoke about it in polemical tones, in line with ours. Read More
Let's consider that Danilo Quinto is not a sedevacantist, but it poses serious questions on the problem of Authority in the Church and makes analyzes and observations that are widely shared. 
Of Marco Tosatti
Beyond legitimate theological disquisitions, facts matter. From today the Vatican occupied by the conciliars is an official satellite of the supranational powers in all respects. It can't be the Catholic Church! (n.d.r.)
Reporting of Gianni Toffali
Of Editorial team