De Mari trial: a rischio le tre libertà fondamentali

Image results for Silvana De Mari and Matteo CastagnaWe also took action, come “Circle Christ the King”. Ci siamo attivati per un’amica. We have activated through all our main awareness channels, in the name of three fundamental freedoms. The defense of being, Silvana defends herself. While awaiting the trial in which she is charged 18 July (n.d.r.). Above, Silvana De Mari e Matteo Castagna a Verona il 19/03/2017
Of Andrea Zambrano
The will appear 18 luglio davanti al giudice di Torino. Silvana De Mari, scrittrice fantasy e medico, will have to answer for defamation for his statements on “sex” homoerotic, dragged to court by Torino Pride and mayor Appendino. She relies on an entirely medical defense brief and receives the support of thousands of people. His lawyer, criminal lawyer Mauro Ronco explains to Nuova BQ why this trial marks a turning point in Italy: “For the first time in our country, three fundamental human freedoms are at risk together: of opinion, di divulgazione scientifica e di religione”. Read More

Share

abortion, homosexualism, immigration. A sinister dissolution

 

ABORTION, HOMOSEXUALISM, IMMIGRATION. A SINISTER DISSOLUTION

Of Roberto PECCHIOLI Everything is held. A civilization that no longer reproduces itself biologically is at the end of the line, especially if the reasons are selfishness, the horror of responsibility, the rejection of the future, the absence of common principles. The outcome can only be the glorification of abortion, the rejection of the old and sick life, the obsessive search for pleasure, contempt for normality...
Read all.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Read More

Share

Millie Fontana: the complaint of the daughter of two lesbians

Image results for Millie FontanaReporting of Antonello Deiana
My name is Millie Fontana, to 23 years old and I am the daughter of two lesbians, conceived through a donor. I am here with the support of all three of my parents. Questa is a testimony that, for sure, it's unheard of because no one wants to hear about the other side of the rainbow, the side not suitable for raising happy children, because they grow up with the wrong idea of ​​what a family structure should be.
Crescendo, I wanted a father… I felt inside myself that I was missing a father before I could even conceive what a father meant. I knew I loved both my moms, but I couldn't understand what was missing inside me. When I faced school I started to realize, through observation of other children and their loving bonds with their fathers, that I was missing out on something special. I was lied to all through school; I was told I didn't have a father… it was very difficult for me to assert a stable identity because of this. And my behavioral and emotional stability suffered greatly because of this.
I grew up an atheist and without any religious affiliation… but I support Christians because so far, in this debate, Christians are the only ones who ask themselves the question and follow their children. Christians are the only ones who try to shine a spotlight on stories like mine. Nobody in the LGBT lobby wants to listen to someone like me because “Love is love” Right? We don't exist for them.
Growing up I looked at myself in the mirror and thought: “Where did I get these green eyes from? Where did I get a certain aspect of my personality or certain talents that no one in my family has?”. The answer is simply “My father”! But in reality he is not just the father or the donor (as they like to call it), ma : “I have an aunt, an uncle, a grandmother and many cousins?”. These are all things that are part of me. Who were my parents to decide which parts of me it is acceptable for them to know and which they are not?
I met my father when I was 11 years and it was probably the first time in my life that I felt like a stable child. I looked into his eyes and thought: “this is my missing part”, not because I fantasized about having a father, but because I was able to put a face to who I was, been able to look at those who are equally responsible for my existence, I was able to assert my identity based on this man.
I want to talk about real “equality”. I hear about “equality” from the LGBT lobby but I wonder what their definition of equality is because, for me, equality means telling the truth, It means being respected for who you are and not just what your parents decide you should know. Equality is looking at both sides of my genetic family and understanding who I truly am. Equality does not mean that, as some studies on volunteer gay families and their children would demonstrate a positive outcome, this should apply to everyone, it is completely unrealistic.
I heard this lie from the LGBT lobby: children don't care who their family is, men and women are interchangeable. I consider this in itself to be a form of gender discrimination. Men and women offer complementary roles in raising the child and should be respected with “equality”.
E’ funny how the gay lobby talks about homophobia. I have stories of gay friends who explain to me that other gays call them homophobic because they prefer children to grow up with a father and a mother: It's totally ridiculous! I was homophobic when I looked in the mirror and wondered where my father was? I was homophobic when I begged my parents to tell me who I was? Absolutely not! I love my three parents with “equality”.
Homophobia, actually, it is simply an aversion to a certain behavior. I deeply disagree with equating homophobia and racism. I feel offended by the idea that I am considered racist for talking about these things.
Because the government is trying to push an agenda that is not based on honesty? Because in reality in every relationship between people of the same sex a third person is needed “produce” a child. Why as a society should we ignore this truth? I'm not here thanks to two women, but three people made the choice to bring me into the world. Science is being replaced by the desires of some adults. In Canada it says on the birth certificate “legal parents” no longer biological parents. The birth certificate is changing from a document of the child's history to a document of adult intent. It is the adults who decide: I take care of this child. But what information does this document provide to the child? It's not realistic. Nobody makes a certificate of intentions.
My mother asked me a question: what would have happened if my partner and I could get married? If we could have had that stable family environment like everyone else? I responded with another question: what type of therapy would the psychologists have given me for my behaviors due to the lack of a father if the absence of the father had been considered a form of discrimination? No response.
The funny thing is that Obama said that now all the other countries will have to evolve, but from what I remember, the evolution took a while’ more than a decade and also one that involved everyone. The evolution was not made with a political agenda that is also silencing part of the LGBT community. They are a small extremist minority that is pushing, from what it seems to me, to the extinction of the genre itself. I don't see “gender equality” I see the intention of getting rid of the human race altogether.
Until we as a society have a discussion that includes children like me for whom it is not okay for parents to decide which parties are (of life) that are acceptable to reveal to the child, as long as this discussion excludes all those who were raised without a father or mother, until this discussion silences and shames the children who share my positions, we shouldn't push marriage to this evolution because evolution happens gradually and I don't intend to be silenced by people who have to tell me how it's acceptable for me to feel, that I'm a bad person because I wanted a father, that maybe I didn't love my mothers enough if I wanted a father.
Thank you for supporting this cause because everyone deserves to have a voice and I will not let Christians or any person of faith be shamed just because they stand up for children… it's ridiculous!
Read More

Share

Minister Fontana: "L’odio delle élite non mi spaventa"

Minister Fontana: "L’odio delle élite non mi spaventa"Of Lorenzo Fontana, Minister of the Family, 4/06/2018
The head of the Family writes to Il Tempo: “I fight against the fury of relativistic ideology”
Dear director,
I thank you, The weather, Your editorial team and all those who have expressed support for me in the days in which a strong attack attempt is underway not only against me, but against the values ​​in which the silent and calm majority of the country is reflected. What we have seen is bitterly reminiscent of Gilbert Keith Chesterton's predictions: «Swords will be drawn to show that the leaves are green in summer», a prophecy that no longer seems so remote. And that's what happened. We stated things we thought were normal, almost taken for granted: that a country needs to have children to grow, that mom is called mom (and not a parent 1), that dad is called dad (and not a parent 2). We said that the last and only ones who must have a say on education, raising and caring for children are really mum and dad, sacrosanct principle of freedom. The reaction – of certain environments that make relativism their flag – it was very violent. A fierce barrage of insults began, offenses, even personal ones, threats (which will be brought to the attention of the competent offices). Social media has amplified the scope of this action, conducted by some on the table. We live in strange times. The fury of a certain relativistic ideology goes beyond the boundaries of reality, even going so far as to question some clear evidence, which are fully reflected in our Constitution. «The Republic recognizes the rights of the family as a natural society founded on marriage», reads the article 29, which will be the principle of action as a minister.
That said: the revolt of the elite does not scare us and we are not scared of facing the dictatorship of single thought. Let's move on, with great motivation, we have many projects to implement. We do it with the many who – like you – they showed us their solidarity. You have been and are numerous and a heartfelt thank you goes to all of you. History comforts us. «They will call you papists, retrogradi, intransigent, clerical: to be done!», said Saint Pius. And we are proud of not being afraid to call ourselves Christians, to call us mothers, fathers, to be for life. We have broad enough shoulders to resist gratuitous attacks by responding with the evidence of the facts, the strength of ideas and the concreteness of actions. Honor to a free newspaper that has the courage to express counter-current positions. Never before has fighting for normality become a heroic act like in this moment. Read More

Share

Mud machine: il ministro della Famiglia è "fascista e omofobo"

Mud machine: the Minister of Family Affairs is "fascist and homophobic"“When one of ours gets to be a Minister and keeps his positions, it is a duty of all of us, as Catholics, make a square and support it, no ifs or buts, each according to his status and possibilities”. (Matthew Castagna, 1/06/18)
Of Editorial team of The Century of Italy
Opening the dance of demonization is Republic, taking care of Lorenzo Fontana, Minister of the Family, with an article that lists the reasons for "alarm" and "concern" that would make the member of the Conte government dangerous for Italy. Let's get started: he got married in a double ceremony, Tridentine and civil; he wrote a book about population decline; He spoke out against same-sex marriage; appreciates Marine Le Pen and Putin. You are worried? If you are not good enough, the "main course" will arrive immediately. That is, participation in a Fortezza Europa conference, Verona association, moderated by the frontman of the Hobbit marching band, Emanuele Tesauro. And then the support for Hellas Verona which the black ultras of the south curve define as the "swastika-shaped team".
These would be the shadows that weigh on the new Minister of the Family, which, interviewed by Courier, clarifies that the issue of gay marriage is not in the government contract and therefore will not deal with it. As for his statements, I'm not against gays, but aimed at underlining that the family is the most important community. In any case, to the question "how will it behave with rainbow families", his answer is “because rainbow families exist? According to the law they do not exist". A response immediately relaunched by the media and which is destined to cause a stir. Among his goals, he announces again, strengthen counseling centers to dissuade women from having abortions and lower VAT on all products relating to childhood. “I never said – he clarifies – that women cannot have abortions, but I will implement policies to try to reduce the number of abortions".
Source: http://www.secoloditalia.it/2018/06/macchina-del-fango-il-ministro-della-famiglia-e-fascista-e-omofobo/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook Read More

Share

Si insedia il "governo del cambiamento" to the test of facts


Of Matthew Castagna
The Lega-Movimento government takes office 5 position. Many no longer hoped for it. On the contrary, after Giuseppe Conte's remission of his mandate and Cottarelli's ascent to Colle, most saw yet another caretaker government on the horizon. Perhaps some had already begun to advise the two leaders to take the much more comfortable and less responsible role of tribunes of the plebs.
Instead something has changed, right at that stage. To demonstrate, if there was still a need, than in the politics of the so-called “Third Republic” all the schemes have failed, in addition to consolidated institutional relationships and practices. Yesterday Prof. Lawyer. Giuseppe Conte returned to the Quirinale with the team of Ministers and the swearing-in took place. Next week there will be the final passage of the parliamentary confidence vote, which does not cause particular concerns and will be greater in the House and more restricted in the Senate.
What has changed in the space of a week? There was a compromise with Europe to be able to govern. We have seen first-hand that those who try to form an executive, complete with prime minister, program and majority receives the “not ” dell’ EU through the institutional guarantee figures, if it doesn't reassure the markets, that is, the Paris-Berlin axis that rules in Brussels through its banks, its lobbies and its rating agencies. Salvini, but not only that, ha, Therefore, concluded that we are one country “with limited sovereignty”. E’ objective. If you don't find at least one method of coexistence, even by divorcees at home, with them, go home. Everything else is sterile rosiconi propaganda. What happened is clear proof of this, even for those who, possibly, they wanted not to see. The new government has reassured people about remaining in the Eurozone, in exchange for a sovereignist policy on immigration and taxation. Already yesterday, but, authoritative government officials have said that Italy will also do those things that someone in the’ The EU might not like it. It will be true? The facts will speak and we will judge on those, because diplomacy is one thing, reality is one thing. Circumstantial phrases are one thing, actual policies are one thing. Read More

Share

Peru: il "card." Barreto in favor of gender in schools

THE NEW CONCILIAR ECUMENIST CHURCH – NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH (LITTLE FLOCK REMAINING FAITHFUL TO CHRIST, TO TRADITION, TO THE CHURCH)


Incredible, the cardinal elect (IN THE NEW CONCILIAR ECUMENIST CHURCH, N.D.R.) Pedro Barreto, designated by the pope (POPE OF THE CONCILIAR ECUMENIST CHURCH, N.D.R.) and archbishop of the Diocese of Huancayo (ALWAYS FROM THE ECUMENIST CONCILIAR CHURCH, N.D.R.), he publicly declared himself in favor of the ideology gender in schools, in open contrast with the rest of the Peruvian Church, opposed the scandalous operation as a whole with massive demonstrations and the faithful also took to the streets in protest. The new cardinal (OF THE ECUMENIST CONCILIAR CHURCH, N.D.R.) Barreto, whose positions immediately met with the approval of the United Nations, he accused those who are against it of being at the service of «lobby interests». Read More

Share

"Christus Rex": freedom of expression or gender dictatorship?


THE POINT
Of Giacomo Bergamaschi, of the Club “Christ the King – Tradition” (photo above of the speakers at yesterday's LGBT conference at Villa Buri, VR. All rights reserved.)
A small minority of the population (LGBTTI), whose sexual tendencies are deviant compared to those of the vast majority, she managed to make her own interests transform into the dominant theme of one global cultural revolution. This is all amazing, because the realization of these interests does not contribute to the solution of the existential problems of society as a whole but rather amplifies them, leading to the disintegration of families and a demographic crisis. The new sexual ethics, which poses homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality and transgenderism on the same level as heterosexuality, it has now become an integral part of pedagogy in schools of all levels. The United States Supreme Court Decision of 26 June 2015 on same-sex marriage has created a scandal everywhere and many analysts have also seen the rise of Trumpism as a consequence of the reaction of the Pro-Life people towards legal decisions that trample on, in the name of rights, the first right: that of procreation and Life. The Constitutional Judge Samuel Alito This is how he interpreted that sentence of 1915:
“Today's decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether to maintain or modify the traditional notion of marriage…When a slim majority of judges can invent a new right and impose that right on the entire nation, the only real limit given to future majorities will be their own opinion regarding what those in political and cultural power will be willing to tolerate.". Read More

Share

Il Signore ha detto che vomiterà i "tiepidi", i.e. the medians…

Image results for ladies will vomit the lukewarmReporting of Gianni Toffali
THE OPINION

They all declined, at the same time they became useless: there is no one who does good, it is not until one. You see, Deus, you will lead them into the pit of destruction(Sal 52, 4; 54, 24).

«They have all gone astray, together they became useless: there is no one who does good, there isn't even one. Ma you, oh God, you will end them in an abyss of ruin". Whoever deviates from the right path of Catholic doctrine and practice not only makes himself useless and foolish, but he also runs the risk of falling into Hell with all those who follow him. But how is it possible that a large part of the Catholic hierarchy has failed in its task and is miserably adrift? There has to be an explanation. A purely chronological fact indicates that the current leaders of the Church were formed - coincidentally - after the Second Vatican Council. In a synthetic way, it can be said that in the last half century a theological education has been imposed, a liturgical form and pastoral practice that have assumed and incorporated contradiction, subjectivism and relativism, deforming the minds of the clerics and making them accustomed to them. Read More

Share

4 actions to stop Gay Prides

Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team
Other news from the gay world (less and less cheerful): trans in the pink quotas, the portrait of Oscar Wilde that the gay vulgate hides, in Belgium the Church (conciliate, n.d.r.) gives the OK to gay acts

Of David Botti

(AUTOMATIC READING)
After a series of meetings with various municipal administrations, the organizational machine of the various gay prides has started, which will move a few thousand LGBT activists from one city to another on the peninsula.
However, after the first permits, the mayors of Genoa and Trento have made appropriate clarifications: not being able to deny permission for the occupation of public space, the province of Trento denied patronage to gay pride because, according to its president Ugo Rossi (autonomist, center left), «does not make any contribution to the growth and valorisation of Trentino society».
No patronage even from the Mayor of Genoa, Marco Bucci (civic, centre-right) who recalls how its administration immediately declared that it wanted to sponsor only «initiatives that are not divisive for citizens or in any case not offensive to any segment of the Genoese population, having this choice also an economic burden for the community".
It is clear that something is changing: party representatives have probably understood that the votes of the LGBT galaxy are minimal (in Bologna, In the 2017, only 109 donors) and they lose votes, especially in small provincial towns.
Therefore, the statements of the two mayors mentioned can provide indications on how to stop the annual caravanserai of blasphemies, obscenity, filth and mockery of the Catholic religion. Read More

Share
1 2 3