Bergoglio challenges the sovereignists: è lui l'alleato dell'Unione europea
Il “Papa” arrives in Bulgaria and sends a signal not so much to Sofia, as for all the capitals of Europe. The Church exists and is in field for these European elections with one certainty: the EU must not end up in the hands of sovereignists.
Francis' trip to Bulgaria is a journey that smells of ecumenism: and it is the “Papa” the first to support it. For the “pontiff”, the country is a "meeting place between multiple cultures and civilisations, bridge between Eastern and Southern Europe, open door to the Near East". And in the words addressed to the Sofia authorities, the theme of migration forcefully returns to the center of the challenge: "The Bulgaria finds itself confronted with the phenomenon of those who try to enter within its borders, to escape wars and conflicts and poverty and try to reach the richest areas of the European continent in any way, to find new opportunities for existence, or simply a safe haven”.
And Francis makes an appeal that actually turns out to be a clear stance towards all sovereignist movements: “To you, that you know the drama of emigration, May I suggest that you do not close your eyes, the heart and the hand - as is in your tradition - to those who knock at your door porte“. Read More

The conflict in Libya seems to be getting tougher day by day.
The publication of the most recent Eurostat data, referring to the economic calculations al 31 December 2017, has made it official France overtaking Italy as Europe's second largest power in terms of manufacturing output, bringing back an industrial product for the country beyond the Alps 889,4 billions of euros against 883,7 of our country (however at the highest since 2011 to date).
There is a risk of a new diplomatic crisis between Italy and France. And this time it's about China, or better, the New Silk Road. The possible signing of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Italian and Chinese governments has raised a fuss that does not only concern relations between the United States and Italy, but also between Italy and European partners. And as usual it is Paris that accounts for the "lion's share" of those who strike (or they want to strike) Italian interests.
In the summer of two years ago in a small church in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray, near the French city of Rouen, one of the many episodes of jihadist violence that bloodied Europe during the years of maximum expansion of the Caliphate took place. Two armed men broke into the place of worship and after a brief hostage-taking they slaughtered Father Jacques Hamel. That episode shocked French and world public opinion and brought the spotlight back on the issue of persecutions against Christians. According to the site The religion of peace only between 9 and the 15 June there were at least 46 attacks against Christians around the world. While in May the episodes were 189 and people killed 888. The numbers take on critical proportions if we consider the years since 2013 al 2017. Over 114 thousand people killed and 124 thousand injured.
It was September 2016 when the tycoon George Soros, founder of the Open's "philanthropic" network Society Foundations, announced from the columns of
The summit between the European Union and the Arab League in Egypt ended with a final statement of 17 points in which speaks of "a new era of cooperation". An important announcement which, however, did not warm the hearts of those present. These international meetings increasingly take on the characteristics of large stages where little is decided, at least from a multilateral point of view, but we try to take on leadership positions.
Beyond the damage, even the mockery. The France of Emmanuel Macron not only decided to strike Italy hard on the
The image that has arrived in recent weeks from different corners ofEurope It's certainly not the most edifying. There is not a country in the European Union that can say it is safe from a government crisis or mass protests. E da Est a Ovest, the squares are inflamed and governments appear increasingly fragile. Incapable of carrying forward their agenda and above all dangerously prone to systemic crises and from which they never appear capable of emerging strengthened.