Actuality | Catholics between Europeanism and Populism

Populism: between rebellion and construction
by

“We Catholic traditionalists give the metaphysical reason for the existence of populism. Like it or not. In the long term, the right path of sovereignty and identity will converge, even unconsciously, in the restoration of the Papacy, as a transcendent condition for the reordering of society” (Matthew Castagna, Christ the King-Tradition)
Of Roberto Siconolfi
Populism: between rebellion and construction
Source: over the line
Today the entire establishment is moving full steam ahead in opposition to the nascent populist movement. Populism, this derogatory term invoked for every maneuver, political or theoretical, which goes beyond EU directives and single thinking. A gap that opens within an increasingly complete and totalitarian system and which vehemently affirms the renewed needs of the European peoples.
In the preface to the essay “Populism – the end of the right and the left” by Alain de Benoist, Prof Zarelli states that it is also a mentality and a state of mind. And how could he not, from a conscious and rational point of view we can affirm that it is "the voice of the soul of the European peoples". A process that follows the awakening of the sacred feminine of the original metaphysical conceptions. A soul that revolts against the abuses of a society of obtuse bureaucrats, of a system of debtors and creditors (see Eurozone), of technocrats who have debased the best identity and cultural qualities of the peoples of Europe with the force of mass psychology.
But who is afraid of populists and why?? By analyzing the categories we can define a group of restricted oligarchies made up of: financial economics; mainstream (a vast category that includes both the world of media and mass culture); heteronomous centers of power (Bilderberg, Trilateral, Aspen Institute, NATO etc.). It is from here that the threads are woven as well as political domination, also of the attack on the entire populist movement as a whole. Read More

Share
Actuality | Non-fiction

The future of Sovereignty
by

The future of SovereigntyA RELIABLE OPINION TO REFLECT ON
Of Roberto Siconolfi
Source: Heretically
The entire political-ideological movement linked to the sovereignist/populist alignment moves in a context and in a series of precise directions. Continuing along this path new questions arise, on crucial choices which can be responded to either with the dry alternative or with the affirmation of a plural ideological-political wave which despite having a very distinct central axis, contains “different” if not even “contrasting” options. As for the context,starting from the most obvious aspect, we must take note of the definitive drying up of the left political area but more precisely of Marxism. The death of Domenico Losurdo embodies a symbolic end of all "intellectually honest" Marxism with which it is still worth dealing and with which one can also find points of convergence for very concrete political battles. The same can be said for certain political subjectivities, representatives of that area. However, we must realize that Marxism is completely finished, and not for reasons of who knows what historical significance. It has reached its lowest point, the “0” of its descending parable.
The new era, the new millennium, the possibility of looking with a broad historical perspective must bring, and already brings, for those who haven't noticed, to the affirmation or rather the "return" of completely different principles and values ​​that would be more appropriate to define as "spiritual". The inconsistency and "desolation" of the "materialist" and "economist" proposal of Marxism is very little in comparison and is no longer even felt. It is no coincidence that these war remnants of intellectuals, various groups and small groups, they no longer know what to do with the current phase. The worst of them bark fascist and racist, the best present us with the usual pappardelle about socialist revolutions, with the "economy at the center of everything" and the "class struggle" as the engine of historical changes. (…) Read More

Share
Catholics between Europeanism and Populism | FIFTH COLUMN

Media versus people
by

FIFTH COLUMN
Of Marcello Veneziani
Media versus people
Source: Marcello Veneziani
Cara Lilli Gruber, but how can Italians trust you if you write about itSet a comment with a title like that: “All populists lie. They are dangerous and opportunistic"? And the title faithfully responds to the development. He knows he's offending three-quarters of his viewers?
Like the 60% I feel like one of the Italians right now, with all the critical reservations that I do not hide, more on the side of the populists than their enemies. And I'm not just offended by his definition, how hurt by Italian, as a journalist and free thinker. I would never use a statement like that even for the worst enemies; I would distinguish, I wouldn't feel in possession of the truth. I don't bet on the success of this government, I say it every day. And it surprises me that the one attacking in that way is the one who was generous with the Grillini and their sponsors, to the point that often – even the other day with the embarrassing, rambling, Dibba's rant – gave the impression of being Grilli Uber. I don't hold the inconsistency against you, they are his business, I know that grillini are fine for her if they hang to the left, if instead they ally themselves with Salvini they become bad. There are people who still divide humanity into fascists and anti-fascists, and reality is lost, the present, the world, 70 years of history, communism even.
Through her, actually, I take it out on the media, the Press and TV which are offering a disgusting and desolating spectacle: the Italians on one side and them united on the side of the establishment. I wouldn't have expected the opposite but at least a variety of positions and the ability to distinguish and analyze; someone equidistant, someone else who understands people's reasons, someone who recognizes pieces of truth in the opponent. No, Nothing, a Chinese army, monolithic, monotonous. Like in war. Read More

Share
Actuality | events

The Turkish collapse is an argument against globalism
by
Because we are not Turkey. And the Turkish collapse is an argument against globalism.

Because we are not Turkey. And the Turkish collapse is an argument against globalism.

Do you know what Turkey's public debt is? Il 30% on GDP. A model country according to the dogmatics of ordoliberalism. And the public deficit? 1.5% on GDP. For the dogmatists of “We remain in the euro because we have a public debt of 130%", the very low Turkish public debt would have been a "guarantee against speculation", e “the attack of the markets”: Instead Turkey was…
Read all.

Read More

Share
Actuality | Catholics between Europeanism and Populism

Matthew Castagna: "Cattolici tra Europeismo e Populismo" – The challenge to nihilism
by

Of Lucia Rezzonico
Yesterday, our manager Matthew Castagna premiered his book “CATHOLICS AND BETWEEN Europeanism POPULISM – The challenge to nihilism” (SOLFANELLI editions pag. 243) at the national broadcaster, also visible abroad on satellite, Italy channel, host of the show “News Today” of the conductor Gianluca Versace.
Together with him, a well-known forty-year-old communist from Padua, the commentator Aldo Bianchini, the most conciliar journalist and writer Luciano Lincetto and the area beat singer of a sort “hippie left” Gigi Barrichello.

The guests of yesterday morning's episode: Chestnut, Bianchini, Barrichello, Lynx

It certainly cannot be said that Castagna played “at home”, anything but. But he himself explains to us the reason for choosing to go out with her first presentation in this context: “Today television is still, in Italy, the most used means of communication, as demonstrated by expert data and the audience, very high, obtained from the episode, which was followed by an avalanche of orders for the book. I specify that two types of presentations or conferences can be held: where we talk “in house”, and it is certainly a useful method. But if the aim is to reach those who don't think like you, the means is that of cross-examination. This time I was offered this and I gladly accepted. I have another one, simile, at stake, in Verona and three others, in September. Starting from October I am available for further presentations, always writing to christusrex@libero.it“. Read More

Share