“We Catholic traditionalists give the metaphysical reason for the existence of populism. Like it or not. In the long term, the right path of sovereignty and identity will converge, even unconsciously, in the restoration of the Papacy, as a transcendent condition for the reordering of society” (Matthew Castagna, Christ the King-Tradition)
Of Roberto Siconolfi

Source: over the line
Today the entire establishment is moving full steam ahead in opposition to the nascent populist movement. Populism, this derogatory term invoked for every maneuver, political or theoretical, which goes beyond EU directives and single thinking. A gap that opens within an increasingly complete and totalitarian system and which vehemently affirms the renewed needs of the European peoples.
In the preface to the essay “Populism – the end of the right and the left” by Alain de Benoist, Prof Zarelli states that it is also a mentality and a state of mind. And how could he not, from a conscious and rational point of view we can affirm that it is "the voice of the soul of the European peoples". A process that follows the awakening of the sacred feminine of the original metaphysical conceptions. A soul that revolts against the abuses of a society of obtuse bureaucrats, of a system of debtors and creditors (see Eurozone), of technocrats who have debased the best identity and cultural qualities of the peoples of Europe with the force of mass psychology.
But who is afraid of populists and why?? By analyzing the categories we can define a group of restricted oligarchies made up of: financial economics; mainstream (a vast category that includes both the world of media and mass culture); heteronomous centers of power (Bilderberg, Trilateral, Aspen Institute, NATO etc.). It is from here that the threads are woven as well as political domination, also of the attack on the entire populist movement as a whole.
Going further into the field of analysis, we find all those business-political cliques that distribute tasks, they award contracts, they organize lobbies, they provide recommendations and tacit agreements. It is the world of public administrations, of the University and the school, of the unions, of non-profit cooperatives, of all those pockets of apparent conflict, but who are to all intents and purposes the white guard of the system (ONG, reception centers, social centers, ARCI, feminism, LGBT and other pseudo-rights movements).
It is obvious that this whole world has always had its political-ideological center of gravity in the "new social democracy".. But let it be functional, more than the conservative right to globalist and warmongering policies, this is the real novelty of the era in which we live.
The “new totalitarian social democracy” effectively completes the domination of the economic right, financial and neo-liberal. This political action took place in the Italian centre-left, and in its leading men (Study Program, From Germany, Napolitano, Renzi), his best archers aimed straight at the hearts of the Italian people - and also at their wallets. And we remember the famous statement by the Agnellis that "in Italy to implement a right-wing policy you need a left-wing government".
We can also identify intrinsic reasons that are not strictly linked to the material level of the "why".?” this whole force field, one day yes and the other too, moves complaints for: criticism of the Euro; the Casapound rallies; Assad's Syria or Chavista Venezuela; dissatisfaction with migration policies; the no to the constitutional referendum; la Brexit; Trump's victory and anything else that exists that goes outside the box.
The neo-totalitarian system moves from the repressive point of view on the mental level, psychological. It is there that the new great battle for the liberation and awakening of the individual and collective conscience of the peoples of Europe is being played out. The elements listed above have decided to carve out their own corner of happiness, so they say, in the many niches offered by the power structure. Consequently their resentments and anger, which they will have to vent, but which they slimly say they don't have, they are aimed against whom, Having understood the trap, he moves to emancipate himself from it. It is as if a climate of "collective Stockholm Syndrome" had been established, where the tyrannized love the tyrant so much that they despise those who free themselves, or escapes from the prison camp.
But it can only be the healthy movement of rebellion that generates the positive? Every revolution needs an act of destruction and an act of creation. And it is clear that to do this there is a need to encourage the aristocracies, organized minorities like George Sorel, so that they themselves lead the process. It is useless to lock oneself behind a sterile rebellious vision tout court, who thinks he can do without the reorganization of a "new power". Just as it is useless to limit oneself to sterile anti-elite polemics, who is unable to see the fact that "these elites" are the mirror of a chaos and disorder that involves the individual on a personal level.
The fact is that we need to generate new ones, able to guide the overall movement from the head. We need to devise "new theoretical syntheses" that are able to merge the recovery of a renewed collective identity at a higher level, with the economic-social needs of the popular masses.
Recover "principles to which the entire social model and the community conform". Today that to dominate, right in the West, they are the aspects of the base instincts, of money – accumulated and less and less earned – and of nihilism, it is necessary more than ever to transform this aspect into its opposite. In a sort of corporate alchemical process that turns the negative, at its maximum junction point, in the positive.
Rediscover and develop the spiritual elements on which to found "a new Europe". Elements on which the aforementioned "new elites" are forged, and who can guide the transformative process in a collective way. In the same way it is possible to build a new theoretical-political paradigm that puts the new discoveries of science at the service of this process. And let's think about quantum physics, for example, which brings the role of matter back to the most correct position, that is, dominated by the idea.
And, this is a crisis, and in the Greek meaning of the term, and therefore opportunities for change. a great era, crossed by its misfortunes peculiar to the historical phases of decadence. But a big change, especially if inserted into secular historical processes, it cannot help but involve Man in his totality, after all, it would make little sense to imagine a different future without this.