E' It's a crime to call Muhammad a pedophile

A shameful sentence! (N.d.R.)
EU Court: we must distinguish between marriage with a child and pedophilia
Of Magdi Allam
Dear friends, for the “European Court of Human Rights”, in fact the supreme authority of the judiciary in Europe, it is a crime to call Muhammad a pedophile. Not because the incontrovertible fact that in the 620, at the age of 50 years, he married a six-year-old girl, Aisha, even though the marriage was consummated for three years, In the 623, when the little girl was nine years old. But why, explains the sentence, Muhammad and Aisha remained married until his death in 632, that is, for nine years, when Aisha had 18 years. So, according to the European Court, it can be said that Muhammad married a little girl but not that he was a pedophile because "a pedophile is someone who is attracted only or mainly to minors". In short, since Aisha was Muhammad's only child wife, while his others 14 wives were adults, and Muhammad having been her husband until her death, the sexual orientation of the pedophile cannot be attributed to Muhammad. In conclusion for the European Court if an adult man marries a little girl only once and she remains his wife until his death, he does not qualify as a pedophile.
Based on this argument, the European Court ruled against an expert on Islamic issues, the Austrian Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who had lodged an appeal after being convicted in Austria in 2011 for "incitement to hatred" and "outraging the religious symbols of a recognized religious community". The European Court agreed with the ruling of the Austrian judiciary, according to which we must distinguish between marriage with a child and pedophilia. The European Court also endorsed the reasoning of the Austrian judiciary on the need to prevent the violent reaction of Islamists, I support the "legitimate aim of preventing disorder by safeguarding religious peace and respecting religious sentiment". Read More

Share

Cheap coffee (Part I )

Of Andrea Cavalleri
The term "café" is sometimes used to mean a place of conversation where ideas are allowed to flow freely, a pleasant meeting space in which intellectual creativity can express itself without the constraints typical of the professional and academic world. E’ the literary café is known par excellence, in which proposal of the new, re-enactment of what is…
Read all.

Read More

Share

"Sono stati i russofili". For Macron as for Mattarella

"SONO STATI I RUSSOFILI". FOR MACRON AS FOR MATTRELLA...

“IT WAS THE RUSOPHILES”. FOR MACRON AS FOR MATTARELLA…

Even in France – in relation to the Benalla affair which overwhelmed Macron – the accusations began that, in Italy, were raised by Colle on "Russophiles" and "ultra-sovereignists" who threatened Mattarella's "freedom". With the same methods, the same insinuations and the same clumsiness and carelessness, but peppered with threats (like “the dossier swollen with pages” that…
Read all.

Share

Nigerian beheads little girl, Merkel cracks down on bloggers who break the news

Germany: Nigerian migrant beheads one-year-old girl. Merkel cracks down on bloggers who break the news.

Germany: Nigerian migrant beheads one-year-old girl. Merkel cracks down on bloggers who break the news.

(The Oligarchy, to save multiculturalism they impose censorship, the repression of freedom, and the persecution of those who inform) Germany: Nigerian migrant beheads little girl 1 year and then kills the girl's mother . Merkel gags media Angela Merkel's pro-migrant government has banned German media from reporting a barbaric crime involving a Muslim migrant...
Read all.

Share

De Mari trial: a rischio le tre libertà fondamentali

Image results for Silvana De Mari and Matteo CastagnaWe also took action, come “Circle Christ the King”. Ci siamo attivati per un’amica. We have activated through all our main awareness channels, in the name of three fundamental freedoms. The defense of being, Silvana defends herself. While awaiting the trial in which she is charged 18 July (n.d.r.). Above, Silvana De Mari e Matteo Castagna a Verona il 19/03/2017
Of Andrea Zambrano
The will appear 18 luglio davanti al giudice di Torino. Silvana De Mari, scrittrice fantasy e medico, will have to answer for defamation for his statements on “sex” homoerotic, dragged to court by Torino Pride and mayor Appendino. She relies on an entirely medical defense brief and receives the support of thousands of people. His lawyer, criminal lawyer Mauro Ronco explains to Nuova BQ why this trial marks a turning point in Italy: “For the first time in our country, three fundamental human freedoms are at risk together: of opinion, di divulgazione scientifica e di religione”. Read More

Share

L'aborto ai tempi dell'autodeterminazione

Reporting of ProVita editorial team
These days all we hear about is “self-determination” e di “freedom of choice”as it were totem intangible. Small talk. Propaganda. Smoke in the eyes. Abortion is never a choice: it's one “need”, induced by circumstances, or give it people and give them institutions that revolve around the pregnant woman…

… and who thinks about the child's right to life?
Read the article

«Motherhood is life's greatest privilege»
(Mary R. Cocker)

Read More

Share

Open letter by L. Hen: "Chi sono io per giudicare?"

Of Luciano Gallina
Open letter to:
The Gazzettino of Padua
Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padua
PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin
Councilor of the Municipality of Padua Eleonora Mosco
Jorge Mario Bergoglio House of Saint Martha
Treviso 05-06-2018
WHO AM I TO JUDGE
I am writing in reference to the two letters published by the Gazzettino on the reserved page "readers' mail". The two letters deal with the same topic but from two different points of view, the authors are: Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padova and the PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin.
Since Bergoglio pronounced the phrase: WHO AM I TO JUDGE, the same was brandished as a banner of freedom.
What does freedom mean?
What does it mean to judge?
If freedom, it means doing what you want and/or what you think is right, from this moment we close all the courts and NO ONE is allowed to judge anyone for any reason. Read More

Share

The struggle for liberation from the prison of the People begins

Of Maurizio Blondet
The struggle for liberation from the prison of the People begins
Source: Maurizio Blondet
It is now clear to everyone. It's not about public debt, del rating, or the euro. It's about the struggle for liberation of a people from plutocratic oligarchies, established themselves as a dictatorship. It will be a tough fight, because the enemies of freedom have all the powers in their hands and we have already seen them, since Greece, capable of any inhumanity. It is the Resistance that awaits your generation, young. Read More

Share

"Christus Rex": freedom of expression or gender dictatorship?


THE POINT
Of Giacomo Bergamaschi, of the Club “Christ the King – Tradition” (photo above of the speakers at yesterday's LGBT conference at Villa Buri, VR. All rights reserved.)
A small minority of the population (LGBTTI), whose sexual tendencies are deviant compared to those of the vast majority, she managed to make her own interests transform into the dominant theme of one global cultural revolution. This is all amazing, because the realization of these interests does not contribute to the solution of the existential problems of society as a whole but rather amplifies them, leading to the disintegration of families and a demographic crisis. The new sexual ethics, which poses homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality and transgenderism on the same level as heterosexuality, it has now become an integral part of pedagogy in schools of all levels. The United States Supreme Court Decision of 26 June 2015 on same-sex marriage has created a scandal everywhere and many analysts have also seen the rise of Trumpism as a consequence of the reaction of the Pro-Life people towards legal decisions that trample on, in the name of rights, the first right: that of procreation and Life. The Constitutional Judge Samuel Alito This is how he interpreted that sentence of 1915:
“Today's decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether to maintain or modify the traditional notion of marriage…When a slim majority of judges can invent a new right and impose that right on the entire nation, the only real limit given to future majorities will be their own opinion regarding what those in political and cultural power will be willing to tolerate.". Read More

Share