Bergoglio lost the elections
by Marco Gervasoni
In the welter of comments on who won and who lost the elections, no one pointed out that, among the many losers of the 26 maggio, there is also someone who should not have entered the electoral arena: Bergoglio. But instead he entered it, if not him directly (but certain cryptic statements…) certainly the Vatican and the CEI, who essentially campaigned against Salvini. The gesture, very serious, dell’Almoner, with the blatant violation of the law (and the Concordat) it was perhaps the highest point of the Vatican's challenge, not so much to the government itself, as for Matteo Salvini.
Abandoning the Thomistic criterion of prudence, the leaders of the clergy and their newspapers took to the field with a vehemence and even with arguments reminiscent of the "black priests", as Sydney Sonnino called them, that is, the priests hostile to the liberal state in the post-unification decades. But the demonstration of how the apical part, or at least that of "government" of the Catholic world knows little about its own world, came from the slap of the 26 maggio
Abandoning the Thomistic criterion of prudence, the leaders of the clergy and their newspapers took to the field with a vehemence and even with arguments reminiscent of the "black priests", as Sydney Sonnino called them, that is, the priests hostile to the liberal state in the post-unification decades. But the demonstration of how the apical part, or at least that of "government" of the Catholic world knows little about its own world, came from the slap of the 26 maggio
In the history of republican Italy, only on the occasion of the referendum on divorce of the 1974 the Catholic Church thus ended up dramatically in the minority. Despite the fact that at the time he did not move against a party and its policies (immigratorie) but in favor of a principle. While in this case the only principles expressed by the bishops were the exaltation of an indiscriminate welcome and "united Europe", whatever that means
READ EVERYTHING
source – https://www.nicolaporro.it/bergoglio-ha-perso-le-elezioni/
Of
of the Prof. Alessandro Meluzzi
Mario Draghi senator for life to give a blow to the craziest government in the world that, from Libya to infrastructure, can't guess one? This seems to be the idea that the Quirinale is developing in great secrecy. To date President Mattarella he has appointed only one of the five life senators to which he is entitled, the very brave and toast Liliana Segre.
Let's look at the facts: Baptists, sentenced with final sentences 4 murders (2 committed materially e 2 in competition), escapes into 1981 and finds refuge in France. After a few years of wanderings as a fugitive he returns to France. Here he is arrested but manages to benefit from the so-called “Mitterrand doctrine”: fugitives are not extradited if it is believed that they are wanted "for acts of a violent but politically inspired nature". Moreover in these (quasi) forty years Battisti has always declared himself innocent, completely unrelated to the facts for which he was convicted, declaring that he was persecuted by the Italian state for political reasons. So far we have a murderer on the run who claims to be innocent and benefits (unduly) of a sort of political refugee status. But the unusual thing is the fact that it was created, over the years, a movement of opinion, cross-border, That he “bought” his version of events (therefore an intellectual persecuted for his political ideas, victim of "sham" trials and therefore unjustly convicted). And from Fred Vargas to Erri de Luca, da Daniel Pennac a Bernard Henry Levy, everyone to publicly support Battisti by denouncing the injustices he suffered. And the list is long. In the 2004 was published in France on “Manifesto to free Battisti”, signed by dozens of intellectuals, in which a conspiracy against poor Battisti was clearly evoked, hatched by those who had an interest in silencing it forever.
We continue with the special foreign leek soup. Thanks to an analyst friend of ours who wants to remain anonymous, the commentary on articles taken from foreign newspapers.
It's difficult to make long-term assumptions but it seems sensible, not to mention safe, than in the very near future, a couple and a half billion Africans will watch 450 millions of Europeans on the other side of the Mediterranean. Mass immigration, for now, it found an embankment precisely in the established distances from the sea and the Sahara desert. If the territory between Africa and Europe had no solution of continuity, we would already be dealing with an unprecedented emergency in the history of our continent.
These days I was leafing through newspapers from the 1980s. Almost everything has changed, except one thing: the power of the judiciary in dictating the political agenda o agenda setting, as the "experts" say. Right, then it was just a matter of a few arrests of local administrators (obviously from the government parties) the day before the elections or clashes between President Cossiga and the CSM. Nothing compared to what would happen next. But the plan was already visible and the temptation was already perceivable.