For Saviano, the moralizer, the third sentence arrives: rights violator


We Catholics take lessons from anyone, God forbid. Right, It only seems correct to us to take the chair, setting himself up as a teacher of morality and "defender of rights", that's right Roberto Saviano, and multiple-convict for defamation and plagiarism (“secular” immorality?). Yesterday the third conviction, while we await the fourth if the crime of defamation against Salvini will be confirmed, Minister of the Interior.
Second Saviano, «Catholics cannot influence or boycott new laws. This is deeply unfair.". So, let's forget about getting into politics or expressing our ideas: it would be unfair, we are not allowed. On the contrary, for the writer And «strong cultural violence» any manifestation - for example- in defense of the natural family (Meaning what, the only one provided for by the Constitution, as established by the sentence n.138/2010 of the Constitutional Court). Nobody, Saviano tells us, can afford to «stop the right to dream of having a family and children, despite his homosexuality". This country, he concluded, «it can only start again come on rights».
Read More

Share

We will not die Saviano

Poor Constitution, pulled left and right for convenience and partisanship. And now the writer who hates Salvini does it too
Of Alessandro Sallusti
Roberto Saviano, probably from his New York penthouse where he lives well protected (or perhaps from some pleasant place, secret and armored holiday resort) writes that Matteo Salvini should be arrested because – preventing the disembarkation of 177 immigrants saved at sea by our Coast Guard – he is violating the Constitution on which he was sworn in as minister.
Poor Constitution, pulled left and right for convenience and partisanship. Saviano hates Matteo Salvini, it is his right guaranteed by the Constitution, which was also designed to allow people like him – and to all the ignorant, arrogant, stupid and wicked – to be able to freely express their thoughts. But fortunately the Constitution also says other things. For example – article one – that sovereignty belongs to the people, not to writers or even to magistrates. And the people decided that Salvini should be in government, not Saviano's friends. Amici, like Boldrini, who were soundly rejected precisely because of their ideas on immigration.
Let's go further. The Constitution determines and regulates the rights and duties of Italian citizens, not those of Tunisia or Niger. Obviously – article two – requires everyone to respect the inviolable rights of man, which in the case of the immigrants in question are not those of landing in Catania but of being saved, look after yourself, and cared for. Things that have happened and are happening in conditions of maximum safety on board the Diciotti ship. And we are also in full compliance with article ten, who recites: «…the legal status of the foreigner is regulated by law in accordance with international norms and treaties", given that the rescue of these desperate people took place in Maltese waters and therefore their landing place – on the basis of the treaties – it's not Catania but it had to be Malta or, in the alternative, in part among all the countries of the European Community. Read More

Share

Saviano sentenced (again) for Gomorrah

Saviano sentenced (again) for Gomorrah: will have to compensate a defamed entrepreneurHe will have to compensate a defamed entrepreneur
RECIPIENT
The writer and Mondadori did not correct a passage on which the judge had already expressed his opinion
Roberto Saviano and Mondadori Libri were sentenced to jointly pay 15 thousand euros to an entrepreneur, already compensated with 30 thousand euros four years ago due to a sentence that became final. This is because the writer did not rectify the passage in the book “Gomorrah” in which Vincenzo Boccolato, with no criminal record and resident abroad, he is described as a member of a Camorra clan. The lawyers Alessandro Santoro made this known, Sandra Salvigni and Daniela Mirabile, lawyers of Boccolato, who explain that the provision, filed three days ago, it was signed by the judge of the first civil section of Milan Angelo Claudio Ricciardi.
In summary, Saviano and the publishing house decided to continue reprinting the same edition without removing the defamatory expressions sanctioned in the first conviction. Circumstance that the judge assessed as “new defamatory offence”.
https://www.iltempo.it/cronache/2018/08/11/news/roberto-saviano-condannato-diffamazione-gomorra-condanna-vincenzo-boccolato-imprenditore-clan-camorra-1081722/ Read More

Share