We Catholics take lessons from anyone, God forbid. Right, It only seems correct to us to take the chair, setting himself up as a teacher of morality and "defender of rights", that's right Roberto Saviano, and multiple-convict for defamation and plagiarism (“secular” immorality?). Yesterday the third conviction, while we await the fourth if the crime of defamation against Salvini will be confirmed, Minister of the Interior.
Second Saviano, «Catholics cannot influence or boycott new laws. This is deeply unfair.". So, let's forget about getting into politics or expressing our ideas: it would be unfair, we are not allowed. On the contrary, for the writer And «strong cultural violence» any manifestation - for example- in defense of the natural family (Meaning what, the only one provided for by the Constitution, as established by the sentence n.138/2010 of the Constitutional Court). Nobody, Saviano tells us, can afford to «stop the right to dream of having a family and children, despite his homosexuality". This country, he concluded, «it can only start again come on rights».

Saviano, as can be seen, deals continuously with "rights", he is considered a master, a hero. Ma, at the same time as his moralizing appeals, the writer practices "an illicit reproduction" of other people's articles, come he stated the Court of Appeal of Naples on the day of conviction for plagiarism (confirmed In the 2016). The second civil section of the Court of Appeal of Milan, Instead, confirmed that Saviano also violated the rights of Vincenzo Boccolato, exposing it to public ridicule in his book Gomorrah as an affiliate of the Camorra. Grave defamation, the judges ruled, asking the writer for compensation of 30 thousand euros. The “moral teacher”, not happy, However, he had his bestseller republished without removing the reference to Boccolato, thus reintroducing him as a Camorra member. It arrived yesterday, therefore, another sentence, per «new defamatory offence».
To see the effect it has, In the 2013 Saviano attempted to side with the victim for once, suing the journalist for defamation Liberation, Paolo Persichetti. A sensational own goal. The latter, Indeed, discovered that the writer had completely invented -for clear self-celebratory purposes -, of having received phone calls of esteem from the mother of Peppino Impastato (journalist killed by the mafia), boasting about it in his book Beauty and hell and recounting a collaboration with the woman, named Felicia. Too bad that Impastato's mother she had been deceased for some time and relatives have denied any relationship between Felicia and Saviano, which - among other things- he didn't even have a telephone. Peaches revealed the lie of the author of Gomorrah, who out of spite sued him. But the judges they were right to the journalist, moreover acquiring further testimony against Saviano, that of Umberto Santino, president of Sicilian documentation center “G.Impastato”.
As if that wasn't enough, a few days ago the former parish priest of Scampia, Don Aniello Manganiello, it destroyed the aura of “hero against the mafia” that Saviano has laboriously built over the years. The priest is known for fighting on the front line for the recovery of children from the streets, often children of the Camorra, of the suburbs of Naples. «I too was threatened with death by the Lo Russos», he said, «but I have always refused the escort to be among my people. Saviano must know that his game is now exposed: he didn't even spend a whole day in Scampia, otherwise we would have met or at least my parishioners would have told me about it". The writer's media commitment is «Interesting on a narrative level, but on a practical level, as well as blowing it out of proportion his wallet, it won't save a single life. When the Camorra members ask me to organize the future of their children to prevent them from ending up like them, I don't send those kids to anti-Camorra demonstrations with a flag and a megaphone in their hands and I don't propose to them Saviano's sermons. No. I have to find the solutions, money to make them eat, to prevent girls from having abortions, to buy diapers and pay bills. But it is difficult to make money for the latter, the neighborhood is poor, there is no bourgeoisie and I am forced to look outside for money".
And by the millionaire Saviano -defined “sickle and cashmere”-, never did a coin arrive for i boys from Scampia. «The fact is», continued Don Manganiello, «that the writer is the symbol of anti-Camorra in Scampia they only saw it on TV. You can write about the Camorra without actually knowing the phenomenon: the papers passed by lawyers and magistrates are enough to draw stories from fashionable publishers and TV networks looking for new markets. Only in this way can the phenomenon be explained, to be honest, Saviano seems to me to be a modest writer. If we invite him to Scampia he doesn't even answer. At the Municipality they have tried several times. He doesn't care about reality, he is a man of fiction".
So, pulling the strings, let's find out what about Group The Espresso it will never be read. The master of Republic, hero of "rights", for Italian justice it is: a plagiarist, a doubly defamatory and a liar. For anti-mafia heroes, Instead, it's a TV puppet who uses the Camorra to sell books and pay for his penthouse in New York. The last one, Meaning what, to be able to venture into ethical sermons. The world is already full of false teachers. Of multi-convicted moral professors, pure.
The editorial team
SOURCE: https://www.uccronline.it/2018/08/12/per-saviano-il-moralizzatore-arriva-la-terza-condanna-violatore-di-diritti/