Actuality

The rhetoric of human rights as the latest mask of ethnocentrism
by

Of Roberto Siconolfi
Source: Roberto Siconolfi
The mainstream political and cultural vulgate often projects us into very delicate discourses with the analytical ability of football team fans. One of these is the lightness with which issues of knowledge are addressedinternational politics, geopolitics, political-institutional conceptions, value systems, rights, conflicts and systemic events deriving from them (es. immigration). SecondImmanuel WallersteininThe rhetoric ofcandies. Critique of European universalism(2007) “there is nothing more ethnocentric or more particularistic than universalistic claims“, and never is a more fitting definition to describe the view on the Western world.
In the 1999, at a World Bank conference in Florence, an American economist said that societies struggling to become prosperous need a“suitable” cultural tradition. For neither tenth-century China, nor fifteenth-century Southern Europe, dominated by the Catholic Church, they had this “suitable” cultural tradition, then they failed. This greatly irritated the Chinese delegates who left.
Another episode occurred in 2000, at another important World Bank conference in Washington dedicated to “gender differences”. In the introductory report, a famous American feminist said that Africa was bad even before colonialism because thelocal cultures were “patriarchal”and “oppressive” towards women. Also in this case the

” data-mce-href=”https://sociologicamente.it/glossario/pubblico/” data-mce-style=”color: #4db2ec; text-decoration: none !important; box-sizing: border-box; background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted;”>public, predominantly female and African, he didn't digest the statement badly. Read More

Share
Actuality | Non-fiction

The cult of the migrant. Between propaganda and guilt
by

Of Roberto Siconolfi
The cult of the migrant. Between propaganda and guilt
Source: Stanza 101
One of the propaganda masterpieces of new “ordoglobalist” system it is the "cult of the migrant". Starting from the subject in question, let's see the project, not even that hidden, is to formulate a “new anthropological type”. A very complex project in which the migrant is a party, but which also includes other elements, such as the debasement of sexual qualities, cultural, and spiritual and more generally the whole process defined as Transhumanism.
Even the term "migrant" suggests a sweetening and a Orwellian lexical change. From the term "immigrant" which represented "he who enters a national or geopolitical context different from his own", we move on to the “present participle”, e, Therefore, to “he who is in perpetual migration”.
From a political-systemic point of view the migrant is useful in two fundamental areas:

  • economy, lowering labor costs, thanks to the contradiction between "native" work and "migrant" work, precisely;
  • identity, creating the “uprooted” and spiritually “debased” anthropological type, who has abandoned his family context of reference, community, national, cultural and traditional.

Read More

Share
Actuality | Catholics between Europeanism and Populism

Populism: between rebellion and construction
by

“We Catholic traditionalists give the metaphysical reason for the existence of populism. Like it or not. In the long term, the right path of sovereignty and identity will converge, even unconsciously, in the restoration of the Papacy, as a transcendent condition for the reordering of society” (Matthew Castagna, Christ the King-Tradition)
Of Roberto Siconolfi
Populism: between rebellion and construction
Source: over the line
Today the entire establishment is moving full steam ahead in opposition to the nascent populist movement. Populism, this derogatory term invoked for every maneuver, political or theoretical, which goes beyond EU directives and single thinking. A gap that opens within an increasingly complete and totalitarian system and which vehemently affirms the renewed needs of the European peoples.
In the preface to the essay “Populism – the end of the right and the left” by Alain de Benoist, Prof Zarelli states that it is also a mentality and a state of mind. And how could he not, from a conscious and rational point of view we can affirm that it is "the voice of the soul of the European peoples". A process that follows the awakening of the sacred feminine of the original metaphysical conceptions. A soul that revolts against the abuses of a society of obtuse bureaucrats, of a system of debtors and creditors (see Eurozone), of technocrats who have debased the best identity and cultural qualities of the peoples of Europe with the force of mass psychology.
But who is afraid of populists and why?? By analyzing the categories we can define a group of restricted oligarchies made up of: financial economics; mainstream (a vast category that includes both the world of media and mass culture); heteronomous centers of power (Bilderberg, Trilateral, Aspen Institute, NATO etc.). It is from here that the threads are woven as well as political domination, also of the attack on the entire populist movement as a whole. Read More

Share
Actuality | Non-fiction

The future of Sovereignty
by

The future of SovereigntyA RELIABLE OPINION TO REFLECT ON
Of Roberto Siconolfi
Source: Heretically
The entire political-ideological movement linked to the sovereignist/populist alignment moves in a context and in a series of precise directions. Continuing along this path new questions arise, on crucial choices which can be responded to either with the dry alternative or with the affirmation of a plural ideological-political wave which despite having a very distinct central axis, contains “different” if not even “contrasting” options. As for the context,starting from the most obvious aspect, we must take note of the definitive drying up of the left political area but more precisely of Marxism. The death of Domenico Losurdo embodies a symbolic end of all "intellectually honest" Marxism with which it is still worth dealing and with which one can also find points of convergence for very concrete political battles. The same can be said for certain political subjectivities, representatives of that area. However, we must realize that Marxism is completely finished, and not for reasons of who knows what historical significance. It has reached its lowest point, the “0” of its descending parable.
The new era, the new millennium, the possibility of looking with a broad historical perspective must bring, and already brings, for those who haven't noticed, to the affirmation or rather the "return" of completely different principles and values ​​that would be more appropriate to define as "spiritual". The inconsistency and "desolation" of the "materialist" and "economist" proposal of Marxism is very little in comparison and is no longer even felt. It is no coincidence that these war remnants of intellectuals, various groups and small groups, they no longer know what to do with the current phase. The worst of them bark fascist and racist, the best present us with the usual pappardelle about socialist revolutions, with the "economy at the center of everything" and the "class struggle" as the engine of historical changes. (…) Read More

Share
Actuality | CLEAN HANDS

The future of Sovereignty
by

Of Roberto Siconolfi
The future of Sovereignty
Source: Heretically
The entire political-ideological movement linked to the sovereignist/populist alignment moves in a context and in a series of precise directions. Continuing along this path new questions arise, on crucial choices which can be responded to either with the dry alternative or with the affirmation of a plural ideological-political wave which despite having a very distinct central axis, contains “different” if not even “contrasting” options. As for the context,starting from the most obvious aspect, we must take note of the definitive drying up of the left political area but more precisely of Marxism. The death of Domenico Losurdo embodies a symbolic end of all "intellectually honest" Marxism with which it is still worth dealing and with which one can also find points of convergence for very concrete political battles. The same can be said for certain political subjectivities, representatives of that area. However, we must realize that Marxism is completely finished, and not for reasons of who knows what historical significance. It has reached its lowest point, the “0” of its descending parable. Read More

Share