Of Roberto Siconolfi

Source: Stanza 101
One of the propaganda masterpieces of new “ordoglobalist” system it is the "cult of the migrant". Starting from the subject in question, let's see the project, not even that hidden, is to formulate a “new anthropological type”. A very complex project in which the migrant is a party, but which also includes other elements, such as the debasement of sexual qualities, cultural, and spiritual and more generally the whole process defined as Transhumanism.
Even the term "migrant" suggests a sweetening and a Orwellian lexical change. From the term "immigrant" which represented "he who enters a national or geopolitical context different from his own", we move on to the “present participle”, e, Therefore, to “he who is in perpetual migration”.
From a political-systemic point of view the migrant is useful in two fundamental areas:

• economy, lowering labor costs, thanks to the contradiction between "native" work and "migrant" work, precisely;
• identity, creating the “uprooted” and spiritually “debased” anthropological type, who has abandoned his family context of reference, community, national, cultural and traditional.

From here, the propaganda of the "new world and globalist order" has built a real "cult" around the figure of the "migrant". This cult extends along two lines depending on whether the migrant in question is imported - coming from "other" contexts than the Italian one, European and Western - or export - from the Italian context to a more economically developed or more attractive area.
From a historical point of view, the entry of masses of uprooted people into the European continent constitutes a true masterpiece of globalism, whether it is understood as "deportation”, controlled or planned, in neggs slave labor in the labor market; whether it is seen in an offensive way of "invasion”, aimed at attacking the "weak" moment of the "white man" in order to plunder his territories and his very life.
A victory for globalism, and to the detriment, as well as Europe, of Africa itself, as individuals arriving in the old continent, they should be those who remain to fight in defense of their territories from the economic colonization of multinationals, and by US or French imperialism.
They deserve a separate chapter, i Muslims, and we are referring in particular to the Wahhabi currents, sunnite radicals are salafites, which animate groups such as ISIS and Al Qaeda. It is their same belief, which requires him to penetrate and subjugate the Western world, maybe even slaughtering some Europeans.
It is incredible that some of our countrymen are soft or even show "respect" for these elements who would be willing to blow us up, because they consider us "infidels" and therefore spiritually "inferior". Just as happened in the Barcelona attack in August 2017, consequence of soft and "open" policies of this type, which they had already brought, over time, the Catalan capital to be one of the most important Salafist strongholds in the Western world.
To act in this true cult of what is "other than oneself", we have both ideological and emotional-psychological factors, in addition to the "migratory business" reasons which we avoid analyzing because they are now sadly known.
The most common ones are linked to "sense of guilt". An induced sense of guilt,but, from decades of "Third Worldist ideology", which also made sense when it was linked to the national liberation movements of the 60s and 70s, and therefore supporting Angola, Congo or later Burkina Faso.
The "humanitarian" issue emerged mainly in the 1980s, when by virtue of a kind of "social" boredom the Western wealthy classes, they took on the problems of "world hunger", with the perverse effect of unbalancing self-sustaining economies, and introducing Western models of life harbingers of migration into Africa.
In particular, it is precisely from this phase onwards that that f will emergetrace of hypocritical and "bourgeois" pietism,which will be the coverage iideology of “radical chic hospitality”, and which feeds on hoaxes like "they pay our pensions", “they pick the tomatoes for us”, “they have more children than us”, ecc. – as we see all economic issues that are very reminiscent of Uncle Tom-style slavery.
However, today's cult of the migrant also takes the form of a "militant" soul, radical but “ragged” reversal. This comes from the so-called “antagonism”, from social centers, by silent feminists for the countless rapes taking place and winking at erotic dreams with the "handsome African" - and this in cahoots with the rich "chic" professionals mentioned above -,or even by the so-called modern "beautiful souls" linked to concepts such as "universal love".
Hence all the "militant" propaganda of the "they are better than us" series, “we have something to learn from them”, “life was born in Africa”, "Mother Africa", “the West has plundered their territories”, as if the tobacconist next door, the employee, the young person enrolled at university in 2018 must atone for the sins of a colonial past from about a hundred years earlier.
The economic and imperialist power centers attacking Africa are the same ones that, albeit with different degrees of intensity, they also attack Europe. The true struggle for economic liberation but above all for identity, it is in Africa not in Europe, as indicated by the leaders of the "pan-Africanist" movements such as Kemi Seba and Mohamed Konare, who praise the maneuvers of our government and the Italian populists. In this they diverge from the usual "imported" African "elites" associated with the wishes of Italian Westernism - let's remember! – albeit in a trade union and socialist version, come in the case of USB leader Aboubakar Soumahoro.
It is truly incomprehensible from the point of view of a "militant" logic, how can you praise someone who has cowardly left their territory, one's family and community to come and mimic Westernist seductions such as social network egotism, designer clothes, and the "gansgsta rap" nonsense that is already insane among the natives.
Elements all coming from the middle classes, because “you need money to leave Africa”, let's reiterate this to those who..."escape from wars - very few - or from poverty!”. The impoverished are starving there, they don't pay the smuggler to cut the rope!
In honor of truth, but, we need to analyze too the other migratory figure, the one who created similar reasoning – outgoing but not incoming –,like those we continually hear in youth groups praising this or that European capital "ecstatically". (London, Paris, Berlin, ecc.), maybe hating Italy.
Now that sort of "white" pro-European military service is in force for students, which goes by the name of Erasmus, in which exams are given away left and right and hides an exciting “nightlife” system, convincing themselves that training is being done.
Go to London to be a dishwasher – il dishwasher pardon! – or other jobs that would barely be done in your own country, beautiful revolution or social mobility! The generations of the first half of the 20th century, but also those of the "economic boom", they would feel filled with pride.
Among the founding elements of this "migrant", courtier and true "pasdaran" of globalization there is the cult of the English language, of social networks and technology, seen in a “mystical” key, a kind of "actualized paradise". Hence also a certain contempt for everything that refers to the roots, and towards everything that is "spiritual" and traditional in life or in a community, unless it is "contemporary spiritualism", flashy and “cool”.
Ultimately we can say that today's cosmopolitans are nothing other than yesterday's "provincials", because at the end of the day it doesn't matter if you were born in a city, in the province or in a metropolis, those who have within themselves the cult of their roots and their own traditional identity are superior wherever they are. Instead, "vice versa" proves himself to be the one who makes waste of all this,expressing his "rough" soul and entering the magma of the "indistinct rabble", so dear to oligarchies and speculators like George Soros.
Let's not even talk about all that artistic rubbish, defined as “contemporary art”, or all that Saviano-style book junk so loved by “chic” cosmopolitans, maybe “academics” who, or for having "kicked the ass" of this or that teacher at that time, or to obtusely adhere to the "single thought" that underlies it, they pontificate from Berlin or Paris on the backwardness of populist Italy.
The final picture is still to be decided, certainly the sovereignist/populist movement, and especially in Italy, gave it a nice twist. Hard hits, first of all for everything that is the "power structure", but above all useful by virtue of a "renewed" and "awakened" anthropological and "spiritual" form of Italian and, even better, Western Man.