I know which country will be next to be invaded by the United States

Of Lee Camp
I know which country will be next to be invaded by the United States
Source: Comedonchisciotte
At the end of this article, it will be clear which nation will be next to be invaded and devastated by the United States. O, in the absence of this, what will be the next nation that our military and intelligence industrial complex will try to invade at all costs.
We would all like to know why America does what it does. And I don't mean why Americans do what we do. I think this question could be asked, in many centuries, some future professor, as he shows his students a telepathic video of some current UFC fight [Ultimate Fighting Championship – mixed martial arts] where the contestants kick each other in the face in front of a cheering crowd (not for one or the other of the two combatants, but rather for (view) more kicks in the face).
But we all seem to take America for granted, understood as an entity and as a corporation, has some kind of higher motivation for his behaviors, for the actions carried out by its ruling class. But, in practice, Most of us realize that the reasons fed to us by press officers and ridiculous evening news anchors are the most rotten, smelliest bullshit there could be.. Read More

Share

Isolate Iran to strike Russia: this is how the United States wants to return to command in the Middle East

Report Linkiesta

Image
Isolate Iran to strike Russia: this is how the United States wants to return to command in the Middle East

The attitude towards Tehran often changes. Depending on the balance of power in the region, and depending on the position of the allies, Saudi Arabia by Israel. Now Trump, also to give Russia a pat, turns towards the cancellation of the nuclear agreement. (Of Tommaso Canetta, LAWS)

Read More

Share

Big trouble in the Middle East, ora l'America vuol fare la guerra all'Iran (together with Israel and the Saudis)

Report Linkiesta

Image

Big trouble in the Middle East, now America wants to wage war on Iran (together with Israel and the Saudis)

Obama sought a balance of power in the Middle East. Trump (or better, the Pentagon) back to the traditional American attitude: friendship with the Saudis and Israel, tough fight against Iran. And the situation does not bode well. (Of Tommaso Canetta, LAWS)

Share

Why the UK, The European Union and the United States are uniting against Russia?

Of James Peter
Why the UK, The European Union and the United States are uniting against Russia?
Source: SakerItalia
Introduction
For much of the last decade the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union have waged a campaign to undermine and overthrow the Russian government and, in particular, to oust President Putin. Fundamental questions are at stake, including the real possibility of nuclear war.
The latest Western propaganda campaign, and one of the most virulent, it is the one that started with the accusation launched by the British regime of Prime Minister Theresa May. The British have claimed that Russian secret agents conspired to poison a former Russian double agent and his daughter in England, threatening the sovereignty and security of the British people. No evidence was ever presented. But the UK has expelled Russian diplomats and called for tougher sanctions, to increase tensions. The United Kingdom, its US and European backers are moving towards a breakdown in relations and increasing military proliferation.
A number of fundamental questions arise regarding the origins and growing intensity of this anti-Russian sentiment. Read More

Share

It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran

Of Editorial team
The effort of those who curate this Catholic-traditionalist or integral Catholic site is to help understand the facts that happen in the world. We don't give “magisterial definitions”, we don't produce “kill the game”, we hate niche intellectualism and snippets that no one reads. We love current events because by trying to delve deeper into them we believe we can keep our feet on the ground, with realism and pragmatism, avoiding flights of fancy and drifts of various kinds, which seem grotesque to us, such as ecumania to raise cash, the Freemasonmania that sees lodges even in the coffee cup, the conspiracy mania that NEVER sees the facts as they are but NECESSARY with a conspiracy, nostalgia for dead historical eras, that will never return, the “speckling” of Tradition, through hypocritical personalisms. The articles that are reported to us or those that we write are only contributions to the search for the Truth or harsh criticisms of modernity, in the wake of writers, authors, authoritative thinkers who preceded us.
We do it with the style of publicly engaged lay people, therefore journalistic or essayistic e, Obviously, not everything we publish by other authors involves adhering to their thoughts or actions. This is not Pravda nor Osservatore Romano. E’ a free space, sometimes provocative, It's not mainstream, follows a very clear line, which is integral Catholic and identitarian, open to constructive criticism. We know that most of our many readers (circa 2.000 daily on average, but with very high peaks, that reach the 10.000 on some occasions) he knows what he testifies. We know that you can't please everyone and that's part of it “game”. For those who persist in not wanting to understand this guideline: let's deal with it.
Of Tim Black
It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran
Source: Comedonchisciotte
If there is anything that can be indicative of how superficial and provocative the airstrikes against Syria have been, this is the almost desperate refusal of the United States and its allies to take responsibility for the consequences, intentional or not, of attacks.
We were told it was a targeted mission, self-sufficient, and that its objectives have been completely met. Jim Mattis, the United States Secretary of Defense, he called the attacks “isolated” and nothing more than that. Even more revealing, Boris Johnson, UK Foreign Secretary, he said the attacks were limited to preventing the chemical weapons “taboo” from being undermined, stating that “the Syrian war will continue as before”. Read More

Share

Here we are: the EU creates a network of censors. Freedom of opinion is in danger!

Of Marcello Foa
Here we are: the EU creates a network of censors. Freedom of opinion is in danger!
Source: Marcello Foa
The European Union and the United States have been preparing the ground for a year and a half. And now here we are: Soon we will have a network of fact-checkers, naturally independent, naturally abiding by a rigorous code of ethics and naturally dedicated to the supreme cause: the fight against fake news or the monster that shakes the establishment's sleep.
All this, actually, as I have been saying for some time, it has only one purpose: legitimize the introduction of censorship, limit the impact and spread of non-mainstream ideas, naturally denying that it is censorship. But so it will be: there is no true democracy when someone claims the right to decide what is true and what is false, and making it inviolable and sacred, what is actually a very dangerous form of strabismus, because it only points to part of the problem, fake news spread by social media, and the real scandal is ignored, which is represented by the manipulation of news created within governments, whose impact is infinitely greater. Any lie about Syria, on Ukraine, on Greece remains rigorously unpunished, as long as it originates within an institution, precisely those institutions that now demand, for our good, to limit the boundaries of freedom of expression.
The European Union yesterday took another fateful step, announcing measures, “preparatory”, waiting for further "fine-tuning", already announced for December. The setting is soft, so as not to alarm the masses and in fact few media talked about it; the outcome, but, it's a given. It cannot be otherwise when it is announced, as did the EU Security Commissioner Julian King who

The manipulation of public opinion through fake news is a real threat to the stability and cohesion of our European societies

announcing

the creation before the summer of an independent European network of fact-checkers and in September of a European platform on disinformation to help them in their work. Furthermore, Brussels will launch a new call this year for the production and dissemination of quality information on the EU through data-driven news..

Already, but what checks? What data? Those certified by Macron or the US State Department who decided to bomb Syria without evidence, only on the basis of news reported by the media and social media? Those issued by NGOs which, although presenting themselves as non-governmental, are actually financed by Western governments, becoming a disguised but very effective tool in the context of modern asymmetric wars?
King also launched social media measures from Facebook and Twitter, just as Zuckerberg, to the European Parliament, he announced the creation of a small army of twenty thousand guardians to guarantee the fairness of the "2019 European elections" that is, to take away the lifeblood and visibility of sovereignist ideas and movements that are critical of the EU. Therefore to limit freedom of opinion from above, as happens only in authoritarian regimes.
Unfortunately, the scenario we outlined by Alberto Bagnai is confirmed, Vladimiro Giacché and myself, during the very crowded conference which took place last Saturday in Rome, organized by The dissident intellectual and by the association a/symmetries. A conference that aroused the enthusiasm of those present and which you can follow thanks to Byoblu by Claudio Messora, who filmed it.
The looming battle for truly free information will be tough, very hard. And we will need it, like never before, of your support.
Here is the video, good vision:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPakayBRjac

Read More

Share

Nothing happened in Syria, the West is lost

Of Pierrick Tillet
Nothing happened in Syria, the West is lost
Source: counterinformation
I feel a little reassured because nothing happened. If you followed the Anglo-American press, something I do every morning, you were in an anti-Russian escalation. In fact what happened after the events in England, which resulted in the speech, it was a sort of growing Russophobia that was absolutely mysterious and deserves analysis. And the latest diplomatic development was that the Americans and Trump tweeted threatening a massive attack, ecc. And the Russians who said: Listen well, if so, we will use our anti-aircraft defense and this system that scares everyone, the S400 system which appears to be the best surface-to-air defense system in the world.
At that point there was simply the possibility of a bigger war and some sort of showdown, the cards revealed at the end of a poker game, since it is actually unknown what the Russians are capable of. The S400 may be able to destroy everything that flies in the air and in ten minutes there would be the end of the American empire. Or there would have been a failure of the S400s and the US would have gone on the rampage again.
Well, we shot firecrackers, we negotiated with the Russians. There had been an anti-Russian dynamic that was building and, in the end, the Americans, the British and French struck where the Russians authorized them to strike. So we are back to nothing. At the current state of information, I feel quite reassured. Read More

Share

Attacks on Syria: America's failed lies about weapons of mass destruction and the "Israeli approach"

Of Tony Cartalucci
Attacks on Syria: America's failed lies about weapons of mass destruction and the "Israeli approach"
Source: Comedonchisciotte
The United States failed to gain public support for a strike in Syria in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma, northeast of Damascus. It therefore appears that they immediately circumvented the UN and international law, instructing their delegates in Tel Aviv to carry out the initial strikes against the Syrian T-4 air base on their behalf.
CBS, in his article “US denies missile attack in Syria, Russia says Israel did it“, he states:
Missiles hit an air base in central Syria on Monday morning. However, the Pentagon immediately denied the claims made by the Syrian media, that the attacks were “American aggression”. After a war monitoring group said Iranian-backed militants were killed in the attacks, Russia blamed Israeli jets.
An Israeli attack is still an American attack
Regardless of who actually conducted the attack, this was ordered by the United States. Read More

Share

Putin is indeed guilty? Something just doesn't add up in the Skripal case

Of Marcello Foa
Putin is indeed guilty? Something just doesn't add up in the Skripal case
Source: Marcello Foa
We are really sure that the Russians were the ones who poisoned the former spy Skripal and his daughter? Allow me to raise more than one doubt by carefully examining the news that has come out so far. The points that don't add up are these:
Primo. What is the motive? What is the interest in Putin? Let me explain: everyone recognizes the Russian president's great sagacity in calibrating his moves. He excels in both strategy and tactics. We have long known that the United States (which drive Europe) they are engaged in an operation to wear down the Kremlin aimed at obtaining a realignment towards pro-American positions, which can only be achieved with certainty through a change of regime or with Putin's exit from the scene. Since a colored revolt is unfeasible, the scenario is to make the weight of sanctions and international isolation unsustainable, causing Russian elites to rebel against the newly re-elected president.
In this context, every pretext is used to unnerve or weaken Putin. Knowing the end goal, you have to ask yourself: but what interest did the Russian president have in trying to eliminate a former spy, however out of the picture, resorting to the most spectacular of assassination attempts, the only one that - after the pollonio affair - the whole world would have attributed to the Kremlin? You will agree: it doesn't make sense. Diplomatically it would have been suicide, because it would have offered the West an opportunity for a further anti-Russian campaign, which in fact occurred promptly. No, Putin is not the leader to make these mistakes. Read More

Share
1 2 3