Why the UK, The European Union and the United States are uniting against Russia?

Of James Peter
Why the UK, The European Union and the United States are uniting against Russia?
Source: SakerItalia
Introduction
For much of the last decade the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union have waged a campaign to undermine and overthrow the Russian government and, in particular, to oust President Putin. Fundamental questions are at stake, including the real possibility of nuclear war.
The latest Western propaganda campaign, and one of the most virulent, it is the one that started with the accusation launched by the British regime of Prime Minister Theresa May. The British have claimed that Russian secret agents conspired to poison a former Russian double agent and his daughter in England, threatening the sovereignty and security of the British people. No evidence was ever presented. But the UK has expelled Russian diplomats and called for tougher sanctions, to increase tensions. The United Kingdom, its US and European backers are moving towards a breakdown in relations and increasing military proliferation.
A number of fundamental questions arise regarding the origins and growing intensity of this anti-Russian sentiment. Read More

Share

It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran

Of Editorial team
The effort of those who curate this Catholic-traditionalist or integral Catholic site is to help understand the facts that happen in the world. We don't give “magisterial definitions”, we don't produce “kill the game”, we hate niche intellectualism and snippets that no one reads. We love current events because by trying to delve deeper into them we believe we can keep our feet on the ground, with realism and pragmatism, avoiding flights of fancy and drifts of various kinds, which seem grotesque to us, such as ecumania to raise cash, the Freemasonmania that sees lodges even in the coffee cup, the conspiracy mania that NEVER sees the facts as they are but NECESSARY with a conspiracy, nostalgia for dead historical eras, that will never return, the “speckling” of Tradition, through hypocritical personalisms. The articles that are reported to us or those that we write are only contributions to the search for the Truth or harsh criticisms of modernity, in the wake of writers, authors, authoritative thinkers who preceded us.
We do it with the style of publicly engaged lay people, therefore journalistic or essayistic e, Obviously, not everything we publish by other authors involves adhering to their thoughts or actions. This is not Pravda nor Osservatore Romano. E’ a free space, sometimes provocative, It's not mainstream, follows a very clear line, which is integral Catholic and identitarian, open to constructive criticism. We know that most of our many readers (circa 2.000 daily on average, but with very high peaks, that reach the 10.000 on some occasions) he knows what he testifies. We know that you can't please everyone and that's part of it “game”. For those who persist in not wanting to understand this guideline: let's deal with it.
Of Tim Black
It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran
Source: Comedonchisciotte
If there is anything that can be indicative of how superficial and provocative the airstrikes against Syria have been, this is the almost desperate refusal of the United States and its allies to take responsibility for the consequences, intentional or not, of attacks.
We were told it was a targeted mission, self-sufficient, and that its objectives have been completely met. Jim Mattis, the United States Secretary of Defense, he called the attacks “isolated” and nothing more than that. Even more revealing, Boris Johnson, UK Foreign Secretary, he said the attacks were limited to preventing the chemical weapons “taboo” from being undermined, stating that “the Syrian war will continue as before”. Read More

Share

Here we are: the EU creates a network of censors. Freedom of opinion is in danger!

Of Marcello Foa
Here we are: the EU creates a network of censors. Freedom of opinion is in danger!
Source: Marcello Foa
The European Union and the United States have been preparing the ground for a year and a half. And now here we are: Soon we will have a network of fact-checkers, naturally independent, naturally abiding by a rigorous code of ethics and naturally dedicated to the supreme cause: the fight against fake news or the monster that shakes the establishment's sleep.
All this, actually, as I have been saying for some time, it has only one purpose: legitimize the introduction of censorship, limit the impact and spread of non-mainstream ideas, naturally denying that it is censorship. But so it will be: there is no true democracy when someone claims the right to decide what is true and what is false, and making it inviolable and sacred, what is actually a very dangerous form of strabismus, because it only points to part of the problem, fake news spread by social media, and the real scandal is ignored, which is represented by the manipulation of news created within governments, whose impact is infinitely greater. Any lie about Syria, on Ukraine, on Greece remains rigorously unpunished, as long as it originates within an institution, precisely those institutions that now demand, for our good, to limit the boundaries of freedom of expression.
The European Union yesterday took another fateful step, announcing measures, “preparatory”, waiting for further "fine-tuning", already announced for December. The setting is soft, so as not to alarm the masses and in fact few media talked about it; the outcome, but, it's a given. It cannot be otherwise when it is announced, as did the EU Security Commissioner Julian King who

The manipulation of public opinion through fake news is a real threat to the stability and cohesion of our European societies

announcing

the creation before the summer of an independent European network of fact-checkers and in September of a European platform on disinformation to help them in their work. Furthermore, Brussels will launch a new call this year for the production and dissemination of quality information on the EU through data-driven news..

Already, but what checks? What data? Those certified by Macron or the US State Department who decided to bomb Syria without evidence, only on the basis of news reported by the media and social media? Those issued by NGOs which, although presenting themselves as non-governmental, are actually financed by Western governments, becoming a disguised but very effective tool in the context of modern asymmetric wars?
King also launched social media measures from Facebook and Twitter, just as Zuckerberg, to the European Parliament, he announced the creation of a small army of twenty thousand guardians to guarantee the fairness of the "2019 European elections" that is, to take away the lifeblood and visibility of sovereignist ideas and movements that are critical of the EU. Therefore to limit freedom of opinion from above, as happens only in authoritarian regimes.
Unfortunately, the scenario we outlined by Alberto Bagnai is confirmed, Vladimiro Giacché and myself, during the very crowded conference which took place last Saturday in Rome, organized by The dissident intellectual and by the association a/symmetries. A conference that aroused the enthusiasm of those present and which you can follow thanks to Byoblu by Claudio Messora, who filmed it.
The looming battle for truly free information will be tough, very hard. And we will need it, like never before, of your support.
Here is the video, good vision:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPakayBRjac

Read More

Share

I like the smell of the crumbling Empire in the morning

Of Aidan O'Brien
I like the smell of the crumbling Empire in the morning
Source: Comedonchisciotte
Gore Vidal preferred chaos to order. With his wisdom he believed that centrifugal forces created fractures and spaces in which freedom could fornicate.
Seeing how things are, this is the best we can hope for. However, we could also be satisfied with what happens around us. Why the deceptive plot of the Anglo-American gang, which filled the last ones 200 years of liberal imperialism, it's losing steam. The great illusion is falling apart.
The large chessboard is also not in the best condition. The Anglo-American strategy to control Eurasia has been torn apart by the Eurasians. The grandfather of ISIS, Zbigniew Brzezinski, he's probably rolling in his grave. According to him, geopolitics was just hegemony. And that's one thing that, at the moment, no one owns, least of all Anglo-Americans. Read More

Share

Assad restituisce la Legion d'onore alla Francia: "Non è un onore avere un'onorificenza di un paese schiavo degli USA"

https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/resizer/resiz/public/5ad9ace308f3d9f3438b4568.jpg/526x275c50.jpg

CONTINUE ON:

https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/dettnews-assad_restituisce_la_legion_donore_alla_francia_non__un_onore_avere_unonorificenza_di_un_paese_schiavo_degli_usa/82_23756/ Read More

Share

Nothing happened in Syria, the West is lost

Of Pierrick Tillet
Nothing happened in Syria, the West is lost
Source: counterinformation
I feel a little reassured because nothing happened. If you followed the Anglo-American press, something I do every morning, you were in an anti-Russian escalation. In fact what happened after the events in England, which resulted in the speech, it was a sort of growing Russophobia that was absolutely mysterious and deserves analysis. And the latest diplomatic development was that the Americans and Trump tweeted threatening a massive attack, ecc. And the Russians who said: Listen well, if so, we will use our anti-aircraft defense and this system that scares everyone, the S400 system which appears to be the best surface-to-air defense system in the world.
At that point there was simply the possibility of a bigger war and some sort of showdown, the cards revealed at the end of a poker game, since it is actually unknown what the Russians are capable of. The S400 may be able to destroy everything that flies in the air and in ten minutes there would be the end of the American empire. Or there would have been a failure of the S400s and the US would have gone on the rampage again.
Well, we shot firecrackers, we negotiated with the Russians. There had been an anti-Russian dynamic that was building and, in the end, the Americans, the British and French struck where the Russians authorized them to strike. So we are back to nothing. At the current state of information, I feel quite reassured. Read More

Share

Non c'è stato alcun attacco chimico in Siria

Of Robert Fish
There was no chemical attack in Syria
Source: Megachip
From the reportage of the famous and historic war reporter Rober Fisk it is clear that there was no attack with chemical weapons in Douma. Fisk's version may be contested. Vero, but since the governments of USA, France and Britain attacked Syria as they received information dai social network of the use of gas by the Syrian army, why you shouldn't believe an internationally renowned reporter who has more than 40 For years he has been producing reports from the battlefields? Fisk's article acquires greater authority since he cannot be defined as an Assad sympathizer at all. From the article, here in the original, emerge. Full translation follows. [The Anti-Diplomat] This is the story of a city called Douma, a devastated, smelly place of destroyed apartment blocks – and of an underground clinic whose images of suffering allowed three of the Western world's most powerful nations to bomb Syria last week. There is also a friendly doctor in a green coat who, when I track him down at the same clinic, he cheerfully tells me that the recovery of “gas” which horrified the world – despite all the doubters – it is perfectly genuine. Read More

Share

Attack in Syria: World War III postponed again this time…

THE OPINION
Of Giulio Ginnetti
A few days after the Western missile raid in Syria, it appears increasingly clear that it has not undermined the agreement between Trump and Putin to manage the spheres of influence in the troubled Middle Eastern country. What Russia and the United States have in common is the need to reaffirm their primacy on the international level, eroded in recent decades, but to do so in a way that manages differences, according to the agreement signed at the G20 in Hamburg, in July 2017.
Each of the two powers follows its own "national interests". The synthesis National Defense Strategy 2018 signed by US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, makes it clear that the primary national security concern of the United States is no longer terrorism, but the strategic competition between states. And between Russia and China, the two main actors, with the United States, on international theatre, Trump considers China his most formidable opponent and is seeking an agreement with Putin, to prevent the formation of an anti-American Russian-Chinese alliance.
The target of the raid, which was limited to a spectacular surgical operation, it was therefore not about overthrowing the Assad regime, protected by Moscow, but to strengthen the image of the United States. Trump, convinced French President Macron and British Prime Minister May to carry out a demonstration, without causing damage to Russian forces, obtaining in exchange Moscow's non-interference. Read More

Share

US Secretary of Defense: "Non abbiamo prove che Assad abbia usato armi chimiche"

Grotesque and warmongering Americanism…history repeats itself…but this time they admit it… (n.d.r.)

http://www.oltrelalinea.news/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/130305150918-james-mattis-1-full-169.jpg

After so many biased and one-sided narratives, The US has finally admitted that it has no evidence that Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons. This communication, in conclusion, …

CONTINUE ON:
http://www.oltrelalinea.news/2018/02/17/segretario-della-difesa-usa-non-abbiamo-prove-che-assad-abbia-usato-armi-chimiche/ Read More

Share
1 4 5 6 7 8 9