How we got to this point

FIFTH COLUMN
Of Marcello Veneziani
Let's tell the truth, we Italians have become unrecognizable. If we were to meet on the street those of us today with those we were just ten years ago, we wouldn't recognize each other and maybe we wouldn't even say hello. But how did we get to this point? To understand the present let's take a step back to the past. So ten years ago, these days, he had become prime minister for the fourth time Silvio Berlusconi. The Grand Duke of Padania Umberto Bossi was with him in government. Finish he had become President of the Chamber and dolphin, successor in the breast. Gianni Alemanno was elected mayor of Rome. At that time the National Alliance still existed. The loser of that time was called Walter Veltroni. The Movement had not yet been born 5 place, Di Maio was a stadium mask and Renzi didn't exist, a bit like now; he was a kind of boy scout, he was not yet mayor of Florence. Another world, prehistory.
But what happened to get to this point? There are a thousand factors, and we won't do the whole story. But we would like to focus on one detail. Italy was tired of the left, then and now, she had been disappointed by her umpteenth government and had once again voted for the centre-right and her King, Berlusconi. What happened, at that point? I should tell two stories, actually three.
The first story is that the elements against that government were unleashed. Global economic crises, from America to us; European economic wars, Arab springs bearing down on us, judicial wars against Berlusconi, domestic and international political conspiracies, press campaigns. In short, an evil three-year period which then ended with the well-known white coup that ousted the Berlusconi government. The left doesn't know how to govern and doesn't know how to be popular, but he knows how to destroy, it has a terrible power of interdiction and intimidation. Read More

Share

The double standard of Asia Argento and company

Of Perucchietti Enrica
The double standard of Asia Argento and company
Source: Perucchietti Enrica

From victim to predator: or the double standard of certain characters who set themselves up as champions of rights, who become the flag of media lynching campaigns, what fake do-gooders do, that they have (but) bulky skeletons in the wardrobes… and which act as weapons of mass distraction.
Asia Argento, among the first women in the world of cinema to denounce the sexual violence suffered by the producer Harvey Weinstein and champion of the movement #MeToo... would have agreed to compensate with 380 a thousand dollars Jimmy Bennett, young actor and musician. The news was reported by the «New York Times», who anonymously received the legal documents testifying to the agreement reached last April (https://www.nytimes.com/…/asia-argento-assault-jimmy-bennet…)
Bennett accuses Argento of sexual assault. The facts are related to 2013. At the time the boy had recently had his birthday 17 years, and the violence allegedly occurred in a hotel room in California after she made him drink. She finally asked him to take a series of photos of the two of them together. The two involved refused to comment. However, the «New York Times» found three people familiar with the facts who confirmed the authenticity of the documents received by the newspaper… Obviously we will never know what really happened in that hotel room, just as we will never know exactly what happened in other cases of abuse, what violence actually occurred and against whom and to what extent “sales” of sex in exchange for roles in important films (Some love text messages from a Weinstein accuser that are emerging from the trial shed a different light on the case, http://www.tgcom24.mediaset.it/…/weinstein-colpo-di-scena-a…).
However, it remains deplorable and disgusting that someone can abuse their role of power.
Let's clarify: abuse is abuse that occurs against a woman, a man or a boy. The problem is that at certain levels the rot affects men and women indiscriminately, power clouds you, you corrupt, evil touches you and contaminates you like a disease, making you lose any moral compass and probably disconnecting you from reality. Another problem is that they have the keys to the house in their hands “dream factory” and which manipulate the imagination of millions of people. Allow me a “flight of fancy”.
I have the impression that the Weinstein scandal, Spacey, Hoffman served to silence a bomb that was about to explode: the existence of a network of serial pedophiles in Hollywood (we were already talking about it with Gianluca Marletta in UNISEX). Morbid details of the violence by producers and actors were offered to distract the public from a far worse scandal that could have ultimately overwhelmed and destroyed Hollywood: and there a sponge blow would not have been enough to erase the violence. Because there the victims were a sort of sacrificial lamb fed to the Moloch of the moment in exchange for money and success: children. This I believe is the worst crime imaginable, violence against a child.
Numerous news events − such as the accusation of rape by former child actor Michael Egan against director Bryan Singer − have pushed director Amy Berg, already an Oscar winner in 2006 for best documentary, Deliver Us from Evil, to make a documentary An Open Secret, which analyzes some cases of sexual abuse of minors within the Hollywood film industry. From gossip, we moved on to the testimonies with the names of the accused, reconstructing a real "magic circle" made up of an armored and deviant elite (http://www.ilgiornale.it/…/ecco-i-pedofili-hollywood-i-pote…).
An Open Secret shows how powerful and untouchable Hollywood figures convince children and their families to trust them. That is, we are witnessing the first persuasive call of Hollywood sirens (the auditions, the holidays, the first films) that promise you a glittering career, then the snake's coils tighten more and more around the prey, tearing children away from their childhood and delivering them into the hands of rich perverts.
Many have obviously cried foul by rallying around the alleged pedophiles and preventing the distribution of the film: However, the list of actresses and actors who have said they have suffered is long (even by children or adolescents) harassment on set or even earlier during auditions.
Elijah Wood, for example, denounced that in Hollywood “Pedophilia is a widespread problem”. The actor, who began acting as a child, he explained that his mother protected him from this unhealthy environment and never took him to showbiz parties. (https://movieplayer.it/…/elijah-wood-a-hollywood-le-baby-s…/).
However, many other child actors were not so lucky.
Corey Feldman, star of The Goonies and Stand by Me, claimed to have been harassed in 1980 and brought the testimony of other child/actors who were victims of abuse. For years he has publicly denounced the existence of pedophilia in Hollywood.
In March 2018, just days after announcing that he plans to reveal everything he knows in a documentary film, Feldman was attacked and stabbed (http://www.tgcom24.mediaset.it/…/corey-feldman-assalito-e-a…).
Ecco, I fear that this is a secret there for all to see that will never come to light and that it will not be guaranteed the space in the mass media and in courtrooms that it deserves..

Read More

Share

Merkel is sovereign, not Salvini. And of the most tribal kind, short and obtuse

Merkel is sovereign, not Salvini. And of the most tribal kind, short and obtuse.

Merkel is sovereign, not Salvini. And of the most tribal kind, short and obtuse.

I happened to listen to a speech by Maurizio Molinari on Radio Radicale, the neocon director of La Stampa, on the "revolt of the middle class" which has become anti-European and votes for the "sovereignists". Apodictic as usual, Molinari declared that "sovereignism" is "a version of nationalism", but less beautiful than the nineteenth-century one: that expressed a “will to unite”, to “add”, This …
Read all.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Read More

Share

Becchi: «E invece io dico attenti a quei due che resteranno alleati a lungo»

THE OPINION
Luciano Tirinnanzi intervista Paolo Becchi su Panorama N. 34, 09/08/2018
«According to the authors, è in atto un passaggio dalla Seconda alla Terza Repubblica basato su un dato che – credo anch’io – non può essere contestato. The inability of the so-called "progressive" forces to serve the interests of workers and small and medium-sized businesses, in short, of the majority of Italians. […] I believe Becchi is right when in one of his articles on the "sovereignist revolution", collected now in this book, maintains that the opposition between "right" and "left" has now been overcome by that which in my opinion sees people and elites opposed. […] I want to give new impetus to popular sovereignty. “Italians first” means nothing more than this. They left us a country with little hope for the future and with few smiles. Rebuilding it won't be easy. But I promise you that I will give it my all".
It is an extract from the preface signed by the Minister of the Interior and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, which baptizes the political essay by Paolo Becchi and Giuseppe Palma, From the Second to the Third Republic, appena uscito per Paesi edizioni (304 pp., 12 euro). A book that, first, recounts the birth of the Lega-M5s government and frames it as a definitive overcoming of the political past. Ma è davvero così? We asked Professor Becchi, first ideologist of the Cinquestelle and now closer to the positions of the League.
«Il passaggio dalla Seconda alla Terza Repubblica è avvenuto senza coinvolgere la Costituzione, therefore it is partly an improper definition, but which nevertheless tells of the exhaustion of a political process that began in the 1990s. As I write in the book, il suo aspetto innovatore è nella sintesi tra sovranismo identitario, that of Salvini's League, and social sovereignty, proposed instead by Di Maio and the Cinquestelle. Non a caso l’uno si è preso il dicastero dell’Interno e l’altro quello del Lavoro. Terza Repubblica significa avere un governo che sta facendo nascere qualcosa di nuovo, without throwing the constitutional rules to the wind". Read More

Share

"Sono stati i russofili". For Macron as for Mattarella

"SONO STATI I RUSSOFILI". FOR MACRON AS FOR MATTRELLA...

“IT WAS THE RUSOPHILES”. FOR MACRON AS FOR MATTARELLA…

Even in France – in relation to the Benalla affair which overwhelmed Macron – the accusations began that, in Italy, were raised by Colle on "Russophiles" and "ultra-sovereignists" who threatened Mattarella's "freedom". With the same methods, the same insinuations and the same clumsiness and carelessness, but peppered with threats (like “the dossier swollen with pages” that…
Read all.

Share

The League of Brothers of Italy

FIFTH COLUMN
Of Marcello Veneziani
When Salvini and Meloni were not yet born, was born in Italy, from the womb of The Bourgeois, the League of Brothers of Italy. The father was naturally Leo Longanesi. He dreamed of giving birth a national movement, conservative, popular and bourgeois, that he wasn't neo-fascist, liberal let alone Christian Democrat. But it was seriously post-fascist, since he noticed Longanesi: “Our democracy has only one evil, there is only one defect: that of existing as an opponent of fascism; to live it finds no other justification than that of fighting a dead fascism with Mussolini. Thus we witness a struggle of vertical corpses against a horizontal corpse.". Fantastic. It was the 1955 e 63 years later we are at the same point, even with the grillini in government.
Then and now, there was a need to invent oneself, a movement that represented a large and excluded world, or poorly represented, antagonist to the left, to clericalism and progressivism. We were in the Christian Democratic era, the communists had not yet been admitted into the antechamber of governments, Regions did not exist, Italy was recovering greatly at least in terms of well-being, he had found an acceptable compromise with the past based on oblivion, there was an economic boom and Italians were giving birth a lot, especially in the south. What should we say now, that the world has changed, we are in the European Union, debt is skyrocketing, the regions have destroyed us, we are full of migrants and empty of young people and elites, Italy is duller than then, they no longer have children and the dead outnumber those born? That we need a League of the Brothers of Italy... But the League exists and, if within a month the mood of this psychotic country still doesn't change, it is now even the first party. At his side, small and vainly looking for his visibility and his role, there is what remains of AN and the MSI, called Brothers of Italy, actually led by a sister from Rome, good and incisive on TV. Read More

Share

Who from Rai hurts, of Rai perishes

Of Marcello Veneziani
Who from Rai hurts, of Rai perishes
Source: Marcello Veneziani
I don't know how the drama about the president of Rai will end, if Foa will remain at the helm anyway, perhaps as a senior advisor as happened in 2004 to Berlusconi's Alberoni or if Giampaolo Rossi takes over from him, competent in RAI and new media, in discontinuity with the previous Rai domination and in harmony with Foa's ideas. Maybe we'll figure it out today. But on a political level one thing can already be said: the final veto on a signature of Il Giornale as president of Rai is the worst conclusion of Berlusconi's parable. End up in resentment, burning Foa, align with the PD and the scattered left, separate from the League and the Brothers of Italy, only show the ability to cause failure, it is a miserable epilogue for Berlusconi. That decline that has been going on for years now, has reached a point of no return and breaking of B. with his people and his allies.
Nobody expected Forza Italia to align itself with the yellow-green government. That's right, and even useful, that Forza Italia maintains a critical line towards the economic choices of the Grillini, Di Maio's reforms, amateurism and underlying punitive pauperism, the grillosinistri type Fico or the half socks in power, genus Raggi. That opposition line responds to the nature of his voters, to the mandate received and to its economic and political line.
Read More

Share

Financial crisis and demographic crisis

Image results for demographic crisisOf Andrea Cavalleri
I mentioned it in my essay on libertarian-communism and I owe this explanation to the readers.
The London School of Economics has produced a sort of rudimentary theory that would place the blame for the financial crisis of the last decade on the decline in the birth rate.
The reasoning, very simple, it sounds like this: fewer births means that there are fewer young people paying contributions, while the number of pensioners does not decrease. Therefore the State has to go broke to pay pensions and this fact dramatically increases the public debt and induces the crisis.
This explanation, suggestive and on a superficial level quite attractive, it is absolutely wrong.
To understand this, it is enough to analyze the proposed mechanism in its entirety: if young people are too few to pay pensions to the elderly, it means that they, despite working like crazy, they are unable to bear the burden of maintaining the commitments already made.
Therefore the system would need to make the most of the work of young people in an attempt to cover pension expenditure.
On the contrary we observe a system that, in the official data largely toned down, produces over 30% of youth unemployment and that, actually, produces a percentage close to 50%.
So if the economic mechanism in place produces high youth unemployment it cannot be, and it isn't, the lack of young people led to the crisis, otherwise all existing young people would be employed. Conversely, the overabundance of young people compared to available jobs indicates that, according to our economic-financial system, young people are about double what they should be. Read More

Share
1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 28