Not everything that is written is also the opinion of the editorial staff, as happens for all articles reported with another source. In general, but, the reflection is interesting and shareable as a whole.
Of Fra Cristoforo
I think it's important, before the publication of the Spiffero which will be soon, give you an interpretation of this passage from St. Paul which I consider to be of a capital nature. I have always told you that it is essential to learn to read these times that we live in with the Light of the Word of God. Otherwise there is no escape. We don't understand anything. Only the Word can enlighten us and help us make sense of everything that happens. Because it is already written! It is all already prophesied in Scripture.
This passage from San Paolo is truly mysterious. Many biblical scholars have searched for meaning in these verses. But without a concrete result. They sketched theories, sometimes even interesting, but no exhaustive explanation of this text. I believe the time is ripe. And I sketch an interpretation.
First of all, Paul's passage is this:
“3Let no one deceive you in any way! In fact, first the apostasy must occur and the unjust man must be revealed, the son of perdition, 4he who opposes and rises above every being who is called God or is an object of worship, until you sit in the temple of God, pointing to himself as God.
5Don't remember that, when I was still among you, I came saying these things? 6And now you know what prevents its manifestation, which will happen in his hour. 7The mystery of iniquity is already underway, but it is necessary that whoever is holding him back up to now be removed. 8Only then will the wicked man be revealed and the Lord Jesus will destroy him with the breath of his mouth and will annihilate him at the appearance of his coming, Iniquity, 9whose coming will take place in the power of Satan, with all kinds of portents, of lying signs and wonders, 10and with every kind of wicked deception for those who are ruined because they have not accepted the love of the truth to be saved. 11And for this reason God sends them a power of deception so that they believe the lie 12and so let all those who did not believe the truth be condemned, but they consented to iniquity." (2 Ts 2,3-12).
I posted the quote directly with the translation of 1974, because at this moment we are not interested in the difference with the new CEI.
This passage is of the utmost importance.
Saint Paul says: “for unless the apostasy comes first and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of perdition” (v.3), what translated would it be: “first the apostasy must occur and the unrighteous man must be revealed, the son of perdition”. The Apostle obviously speaks of the end times. And he talks about “apostasy” , of “wicked man” and “son of perdition”. So the apostasy will begin with an “unrighteous man”, which will open the stage for all this. I would not identify a single person as "man".. But all those who have embraced the lie and who try in every way to propagate it.
As we can see, this apostasy is strongly present in the Church today. Both on a theological level (and therefore the denial of the Truth to give ample space to relativism), both on a moral level (LGBT prevailing in the new church). The new church wants to replace the True Church. They want to replace the Word of God with Amoris Laetitia, who give it to us anyway, and we are very close to replacing the Gospel with a passage from AL at Sunday Mass. Then, woe betide anyone who contradicts Bergoglio's work, Anyone who does so is literally torn to pieces. Because AL is the new gospel of the new church. By "unjust man" we therefore mean all those from the head down who have an interest in spreading the lie.
“the object and superlative of all so-called god or respect, so that he sat in the temple of God, proving himself to be a god. 5you do not remember that when they said these things to you" , (v. 4) “he who opposes and rises above every being who is called God or is an object of worship, until sitting in the Temple of God, pointing to himself as God.".
This look is very subtle and delicate, but at the same time it seems very clear to me nowadays. Practically all the mass media praise this Pontificate, practically making him an idol. Father Sosa himself, Father General of the Jesuits,when he said that Scripture could have no "value" because the recorder did not exist at the time he went so far as to affirm: “I identify with what Pope Francis says” (https://anticattocomunismo.wordpress.com/2017/05/16/il-papa-nero-arturo-sosa-del-papa-bianco-francesco/).
Bergoglio's excessive incense is visible to everyone on a daily basis: from the Osservatore Romano, the Catholic Civilization, in Repubblica and Corriere della Sera, up to the printing of t-shirts with the writing "Superpope" and his image imprinted on lollipops (https://opportuneimportune.blogspot.it/2018/01/ultimora-precisazioni-di-santa-marta.html). It seems there is a direction behind it that must obsessively spread the image of Bergoglio in all ways and places. Which today sits "in the Temple of God”.
“for the mystery already works of iniquity; only he who possesses art until the middle is born.” (v. 7) “the mystery of iniquity is already underway, but it is necessary that whoever is holding him back up to now be removed.".
This verse has left a lot of people scratching their heads. What does it mean that those who "hold back" the "mystery of iniquity" must "be removed"? It is the pinnacle of apostasy! There is in fact "someone" who still holds this "mystery of iniquity". Some have ventured hypotheses. Type: “as long as Benedict XVI is there…”, or the image of some other prophet. But the explanation is much deeper and more important. Indeed, He who is still holding back the “mystery of iniquity” is to be identified in Jesus the Eucharist!
What does the new church actually have planned?? This is what we have predicted for some time and which is already happening in many places: the ecumenical mass. Changing the words of the Consecration to make the Mass invalid. And therefore eliminate the "Eucharist". All of this, as you know it is underway. By eliminating the Real and Substantial Presence the Tabernacles will no longer make sense, because there will no longer be "Presence". This is who He is who still holds back: Jesus Eucharist. And when the Consecration will be abolished, the "mystery of iniquity" will have free reign, because he will sit in the place of God. It will be the pinnacle of apostasy. I really believe that these are the times. Meaning what, this Word is coming true now. I must admit that the seed of this apostasy was planted by the Second Vatican Council. I am not saying Paul VI at all, because I consider him a great Pope. But who worked in the Council, forcing theology. Today in the new churches the Tabernacles are no longer at the center. But on the one hand. This “action” was truly diabolical. Because the One who gives meaning to that Temple has been ousted, to give space to songs, dance, flags, rallies, and today also pizza parties inside the Churches.
Removing the Consecration at the Mass, therefore effectively abolishing the Eucharist, the “wicked man” will act openly with all his wickedness.
Everyone has now noticed that Bergoglio NEVER kneels before the Eucharist, and instead he did it on many other occasions., washing of the feet of Muslims, in mosques, in Protestant churches….
It would take too long to explain everything. But I think this is already enough. Also interesting is v 12: “that all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but enjoyed unrighteousness.” , “and so let all those who did not believe the Truth be condemned, but they agreed toiniquity". I point out this term " εὐδοκήσαντες – eudokesantes – to consent, be pleased". All those who have “delighted in iniquity”. That is, they accepted the lie and spread it. I think of the neotheologians, to newspapers, to the Cardinals who propagate heresy etc...
The view is disturbing, but I really believe that this Word is the best reading for these times.
Every addition is yours, commentary and criticism. I am aware that I have touched a very sore point. But this is my reading of the history we live in. And I believe that the Word in question leaves no room for doubt.
It seems excessive to me to consider Paul VI a great pope given that he continued and strengthened the’ work by G.XXIII notoriously smacking of the mafia, belittled the message of Fatima and which opened the doors to “smoke of satan”;
let's leave aside its serious flaw because everyone, for better or worse we are sinners.
Marcello
I would be curious to know what the editorial staff considers acceptable about this embarrassing delirium!
Dear Ale, style would like you to ask the editorial staff what they think is acceptable about the defined article “embarrassing delirium”, you explain the reasons according to which it would accept such harsh criticism. Ma, you are, style is not for everyone or for everyone. So we answer you directly that, as is easy to understand, we cannot share the passage favorable to Paul VI. For the rest, we consider the observations made as an interesting reflection, broadly acceptable, from the passages on Saint Paul to the liturgical crisis that leads to the lack of the Eucharist in the new conciliar church
I would like to know from Ale why there’ article calls it “embarrassing delirium” given that the topics covered are very current and shareable.
Maybe you're a “Troll” or an unbeliever or rather a Bergoglian?
Because this article is an embarrassing delusion? E’ soon said, but I specify that my words are addressed to those who are objectively Catholic, that is, to those who note the at least formal vacancy of the First See, and not to the runaway modernists who frequent blogs like these only to lash out against Bergoglio and his disastrous predecessors in the scam, taking pleasure in scavenging the one to whom, despite it all, they recognize the Authority of Vicar in the land of Our Lord. Why, themselves. Marcello (MS 2550), I don't address her and I prefer to draw a very compassionate veil over her words and move on!
1) Please note the pathetic pride of our Fracasso who, after having stated how difficult the passages of Holy Scripture on which he will reflect are to understand and interpret, he claims to have found it himself, after the water holes of countless illustrious theologians and biblical scholars, the solution to the dilemma: what an extraordinary genius, there's nothing to say!
2) “They want to replace the Word of God with AL”. Ah, so this would be the real problem! Apart from the disturbing fact that the Word of God has already existed for some time(after the Second Vatican Council)literally replaced with ever new and blasphemous translations, the entire Deposit of Faith itself has been distorted by the fake magisteriums of the conciliabular and post-conciliabular paps. AL appears instead when the false church consistently decides to admit dogs and pigs to the banquet of non-transubstantiated bread and wine. And in this regard we get to the point 3.
3) The fake Eucharist(invalids) o, in the best cases, illicitly packaged, it would be what keeps the Mystery of Iniquity from manifesting itself? But please! Meanwhile the famous “Katechon” is unanimously referable, and rightly so, to the Papacy to which they are linked and by which, at least ordinarily speaking, almost all of the Sacraments also depend on it, Eucharist included.
4) The bugaboo of the ecumenical mass is then tragicomic considering the evidence that the fake masses of Montini's novus ordo closely follow the “prices” Lutherans and the first to admit it, as well as boasting about it, they are the same supporters of the fatal so-called reform, without counting the authoritative studies conducted by authentic eminent theologians, one above all “Brief critical examination” written by Mons. Guerard de Lauriers and swallowed by the cards. Ottaviani and Bacci.
4) our Fracasso identifies the Second Vatican Council(Conciliabolo) the seed of apostasy, as if the most solemn expression of Petrine Teaching, One with Christ and all the Bishops of the Orbe, under the presidency of the Third Person of the Trinity could favor the apostasy of the Church!
I agree on one thing and that is that
“this Word is the best reading for these times” Too bad our Fracasso, who considers the Brescia pederast a “great Pope”, he didn't understand a damn thing about it!
As briefly illustrated, this article both as a whole and in detail, contains a lot of obvious nonsense and I still wonder what a true Catholic could save from these delusions! If we want to resume shareable reflections on this matter even if written by subjects with whom we have disagreements, then I recommend the enlightening and objectively shareable writing at the bottom of the comment and I would leave the embarrassing modernist delusions to sites like “anonymous of the cross”(better that they remain anonymous given the shameful rubbish they publish) e “church and post-conciliar”!
Here is the enlightening article I was talking about that people like Fracasso and Marcello would do well to read carefully.!
http://vaticanocattolico.com/meretrice-di-babilonia/
I forgot an interesting point, that of the man who takes God's place in the Temple.
Obviously it can be referred to the series of papocchi certainly starting from Montini. In fact, God teaches, governs and sanctifies his Church through his visible Vicar who represents him. Furthermore it could also mean the lack of the Priesthood and not the physical movements of the tabernacles, which are a sign(?) and certainly a consequence of the lack of the Priest who acts in persona Christi offering the Sacrifice, Priest today probably replaced by a layman disguised as a priest who, as well as not being able to offer the Oblatio Munda, unlawfully occupies a physical position and role reserved for a consecrated Minister!
Baravo Ale. This “Failure” loves praise and not objective reminders, as can easily be seen from his pseudo-traditionalist website, but it doesn't attack here.
Unquestionably, with regard to “Christ the King”, we agree with the article reported by Ale: http://vaticanocattolico.com/meretrice-di-babilonia/
I wanted to write well done Ale.
well done Ale!