Key moment in the evolution of European criminal law, it was the Tampere European Council of 1999.
In the proposed framework decision that arose from it and in its developments (DQ 2002/584/GAI), cloaked in the usual Eurocratic proclamations of freedom and magnificent and progressive fortunes, principles had taken shape that devastated the Italian constitutional and penal system.
To convey the toxic without serious pangs of conscience, in the Bel Paese we were perhaps counting on the traditional ideological superficiality with which our leaders usually welcome pro-European proposals. And probably also on a rooted one, centuries-old spirit of subjugation of large sections of Italian society towards other Europeans.
Instead – a memorable fact – a close discussion had developed on the topic, with which the existence of a pro-European proposal was brought to the attention of the public and less attentive specialists which envisaged the unimaginable.
As unimaginable as it should be, ad es., the possibility of being punished who knows where - Europe is large - for an act committed in Italy, in contempt of the judge's constitutional and natural law principle - repetition is obligatory - natural.
read everything
source – https://www.maurizioblondet.it/il-mandato-di-arresto-europeo-prospettiva-gulag/