by Francy Rossini (our friend, in Russia)

There is an element to which attention must be paid, the failure of political welding between the two continental powers, Germany and Russia and the decadence of the theory of "Greater Europe" which should have constituted the revolutionary geopolitical event since 2000 forward. The facts have shown, about it, that the subservience of the German elites and people to Atlanticism is unfortunately still strong, perhaps irreversible unless a new “Germanic spirit”, conservative, radiates from East Germany. The only European elite that, vice versa, it is truly anti-Americanist and anti-British, the French one, it is unfortunately still imprisoned in the civil religion of extremist secularism, thus converging on a direction, like it or not, neo-Atlantic. As a result he foolishly opted for Macron, a British agent created by the Anglo-Saxon elites, against the pro-Russian Marine. Chinese and Russian elites therefore believe that Europeanism is an empty and misleading political concept, a metamorphosis of Atlanticism, there is no “imperialism” European nor a concrete political-military project and this will make, as is already happening, Europe, a land of conquest, as “a people who do not know how to carry their own weapons, he must carry other people's weapons” (Benito Mussolini). We therefore move from the Chinese geopolitical perspective based on the idea of ​​Europe as a mere province of the socialist and Confucian "Greater Asia" with global traction in the 21st century, to the Russian one which seems to aim at the affirmation of a Gaullist front of "right-wing" European nations, as neo-traditionalists, to be integrated, however, into an anti-Western Eurasian Civilization. However, Russia must continually face the onslaught of Euro-Western imperialism, which attempts to advance against Moscow with Color Revolutions and hybrid warfare. The Atlantic elites are, on the other hand, divided among themselves and consequently also on the fate of the European nations. The only common reason towards Europe, among these, it seems to be the intolerance for German geoeconomic power. I CAPACITY However, they seem to have chosen the prospect of global domination by Beijing (evidence of this can be found in the endorsement of the CEOs of Amazon and Facebook for the Chinese leader and the election of Xi as the "enlightened world leader" by the global press) and consequently the connection with the EU, with Russia the only global enemy to be eliminated. Il Anglo-Saxon party (also well present overseas, for example in the Clinton-Obama Dems) it is the war party, and where there are anti-Putinian Color Revolutions there is the flag of the United Kingdom flying; the domain, but, for London it must absolutely remain in the West, the great divergence with Beijing cannot and should not be leveled. Il Trumpism, who ingeniously knew how to take advantage of an initial internal struggle at Goldman Sachs, has increasingly become the political front of Western productive capitalism which reacts in the face of a globalization which has seen the short-sighted and utopian designs of the lobbies of Western financial capitalism fail miserably, as concrete power, political and economic, risks moving definitively towards the new non-Western powers, like Russia and China and Kaplan these days speaks of an irreversible decline of the West (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/01/opinion/afghanistan-war-american-troops-withdraw.html). It should also be considered in this regard that China, despite the astonishing economic and commercial growth of recent decades, politically and militarily, he can't compete anyway, at least for now, with the USA. “Number is power”, work too, and here China dominates, but nuclear power and the maritime fleet are the same, if not more, beyond the rhetoric on democracy, the rights, freedom and dollar diplomacy, and here China, despite the clever intrigues of subtle mandarin politics, it has no escape in the face of the North American giant. Russia is therefore the only global antagonist (also and above all ideological) of the West, it is today the only serious Global Alternative to Jacobin and Masonic totalitarian Democracy, Putin recently called the traditionalist philosopher Solzhenitsyn the spiritual father of New Russia. Russian diplomatic policy has in its intimate psychological background centuries of traditional political competition with Anglo-Saxon imperialism (Moscow's greatest enemy, still today), detail that should not be underestimated. On the military level, Furthermore, the Federation armed forces would even catch up, in recent years, the world record. The decision of the all-Russian elite to intervene unilaterally, without any prior consultation with the Obama Democrats (the Anglo-Saxon party) in Syria in 2015 has opened a new global scenario, a truly multipolar era. If Putin had not planned the anti-terrorism operation in the Middle East, Damascus would have fallen into the hands of the pro-Anglo-Saxon Sunni army and the terrorists would have rushed towards Moscow. The holding of a Russian-Chinese alliance, even for purely defensive purposes, it is very doubtful and with many question marks, the true Russian Eurasian backbone is therefore not the one between Moscow and Beijing, but that's it with the Shiite-Iranian front which has solidified with brilliant results in the Middle East; after the historic meeting in Tehran between Putin and Ahmadinejad years ago, Russia and Iran have unified their destiny in the field of world politics, succeeding, at least for the moment, to save global peace in the face of the hybrid warfare instrument called Isis. The victory in Damascus is the greatest tactical victory of a clear political front (decidedly anti-Western) after September 11th 2001 and the years of monopolar chaos dominated by London and the US that followed. The rapprochement of Erdogan's Sunni Türkiye (belonging to NATO) to this Russian-Persian Eurasian front has placed the Kremlin in a position of geopolitical and military supremacy compared to Beijing and Washington. The obvious fear, to such a point, is for Western elites to opt again, as they always did when they saw global power slipping from their grasp, for a series of provocations that could degenerate into a very heated conflict. Needless to say, the zone of European nations would be the hard front suitable for limiting the damage of the three hegemonic powers, Russia, China, Usa. If Russia has everything to fear from such a scenario, the far west has in theory everything to gain from a natural and now advancing decline. Plan A, the most practicable, it consists in the decoupling of an authentically neo-Gaullist or Lepenist New France from the West. Plans B and C consist of conventional warfare scenarios, Unfortunately, more or less warm. The decisive match is therefore played in Paris for now, not in Italy or Germany, as the Western media would have you believe. The global elite (Russian, Chinese, Atlantic) they are actually geopolitically uninterested in Rome and Berlin, little American pawns. It is no coincidence that the strategy of tension has affected Paris, continues to hit Paris, not Rome or Berlin. A definitive, ideological, decoupling led by the French national Right, a repositioning of Paris towards Eurasia would definitively avert the concrete risk of a Third World War and would mean the definitive and liberating, at least for humanity, decline of the Atlantic West. Even if we talk, to continually raise smoke screens, almost exclusively finance and technology, the decisive challenge is absolutely political; today like yesterday. Francy Rossini