The “transgenderism lesson” held by Vladimir Luxuria in the late evening on Raitre, continues to spark debate and reactions. According to the psychiatrist Tonino Cantelmi, an episode like that of On the blackboard, broadcast last Sunday, it shouldn't have aired, nor at first, nor in the late evening. Such delicate topics, such as homosexuality or transsexuality – declared Cantelmi a Pro Life – they should only be addressed within the family e, Anyway, any television format intended for minors, should be carefully examined by parents' representatives, teachers and other educational figures.

How much a type of "education" like that offered in the program in which Luxuria participated can impact innocent ears?

«I haven't seen the episode in question, however I believe there was a short circuit: I believe that certain issues at such sensitive ages should be addressed within the family and that the main responsibility for education on these issues lies with parents. Parents know their children's sensitivity and know how to speak, how to welcome them, how to support them. So, I don't think that at such a delicate age it is right to direct such a disruptive intervention to them".

The “lesson” aired at 22.20 but it was initially scheduled for prime time. He would like to send an appeal to President Foa and to the top management of Rai?

«I believe that the Rai can perform a service function and even an educational and pedagogical function, However such delicate topics, which concern the identity of the person and which ultimately concern the development of the person himself, they cannot be addressed either in prime or late evening. I believe that this is not the task of state television, that is, television paid for by citizens. Also there is another bias in this matter: a lesson aimed at a very young audience, of kids. On this I believe that the educational function of television must deeply respect the sensitivities and responsibilities of parents".

What they should be, rather, the themes to convey to the little ones (even in a “television lesson”)?

«Educational planning requires the participation of those responsible for educational functions. I believe that valuing the experience of parents, educators, teachers and other people who deal with children is right and proper, but from a pluralist perspective, attentive and respectful of the constitutional duty of parents to provide for the education of their children. So, before putting someone in the chair, it is appropriate for there to be a shared reflection".

Dal 29 al 31 March, a Verona, the World Congress of Families will be held: believes that this context can represent a good opportunity to relaunch educational freedom and the prerogatives of families regarding the problems we mentioned earlier?

«Give back to the family what belongs to the family and create a network of families that support families: I would say this would be an important goal, because putting the family back at the center of the field is good for the whole of society. Expelling the family from the camp is just destructive.".

Luca Marcolivio

source – https://www.notizieprovita.it/notizie-dallitalia/luxuria-parla-lo-psichiatra-cantelmi-restituire-alla-famiglia-cio-che-e-della-famiglia/