Report Linkiesta
There will be no Conte Government: the real prime ministers will be Salvini and Di Maio
The leaders of Five Star and the League did not miss the opportunity to speak bombastically. But Mattarella insists: wants to "constitutionalize" the Government. For better or for worse it is a new phase of the Republic. (Of Flavia Perina, LAWS)
Trust Perina, fall down’ from his tree, what will he say’ now that the Conte government is taking shape better ? With approval, obtorto neck, of Mattarella who already’ whitewasher of the Mitrokyn dossier(Cossiga's words) he was elected by the now defunct PD, and now I try’ in vain to dissuade from trying government “antieuro”…There isn't’ successful due to Salvini's surprise move that I declare’ that according to the constitution the president must accept a government because’ the Italian people and’ sovereign, certainly not the president (elected by a defunct party) Only then did the president understand the message and declare absolute respect for the Constitution ! Bravo, he understood !
Salvini , if it continues like this , risks a car accident or being hit by an isolated madman.
E’ arrived where no one before, despite the proclamations, he succeeded. That is, to bring names of possible ministers of anti-Europeanist establishment weight to President Mattarella's table. E’ got beyond the chatter, the demagogy and propaganda of those who don't count a pipe and gnaw from morning to night.
It will be enough? We'll see. But the predicted fact exists and the data is historical.
Here is an analysis of what Salvini and Di Maio require in two voices: Paolo Savona minister of economy. Horror and fear on the part of all entities’ devils of Europe, rolling pin included…”..However, the thesis according to which Mattarella's veto focuses on the possibility of Paolo Savona arriving at the Ministry of Economy gives rise to more discussion, former general director of Confindustria and Minister of Industry in the Ciampi government, long years alongside Guido Carli, who as Treasury Minister signed the Treaty of Maastricht for Italy.
“When Carli's hand shook”
The eighty-one year old economist from Cagliari is defined as "eurosceptic" and, therefore, his name would risk causing panic in Brussels. This is a partial simplification. Claiming that our country's entry into the euro was premature, as well as not being a peculiar thesis in the economic and academic debate, it is not the same as advocating a disorderly exit from the monetary union (for a neat one, according to Savona, instead we should at least be ready). And Savona knows those treaties - which the yellow-green executive will perhaps ask to rediscuss - well.. And he discussed it at length with Guido Carli, expressing his opposition to him when he decided to place his signature on rules that Savona considered arbitrary and restrictive.
Those ideas were summarized in the volume of 1996 'Europe with feet of clay'. And those days were retraced in the recent pamphlet 'When Carli's hand trembled', co-written with Carlo Panerai. “In my life as Governor I have signed many signatures. When I signed the treaty my hand was shaking.", it is Carli's confidence that Panerai claims to have collected, “I knew it was necessary to bring Italy into the top ranks of Europe, but I also knew that Italy is not ready. Let's hope it becomes one.".
“I am not an anti-European. On the contrary"
Savona has always tried to reject the label of Eurosceptic, which he sees as the result of a misunderstanding. “I pass for one of the few anti-European institutional economists, but it's not like that", he said in an interview with Libero last year, “I would be for a united Europe, for this reason I can only say bullshit about what I see in Brussels. The EU's difficulties are the fault of the elites who lead it: they say they care about the people but they only care about themselves and will never admit the failure of Europe because it would mean condemning themselves. And this exacerbates the problems. The lack of diagnosis leads to the absence of therapy. The Italian elites wanted this Europe, wrong. Let them take the blame or have someone put it on them.". An orderly dismantling of the monetary union, according to Savona, however, it should at least be taken into consideration: “I fear the slow degradation more than the strong negative shock. The euro has brought more disadvantages than advantages to the entire continent.".
For the reasons you gave, the scathing critics even from the so-called radical right should understand that if they had gone to government they (but if people don't vote for them, they should think a lot!) and submitted names “anti-system” or critical of the EU and the strong powers in general, they would have received the same treatment. This is not a game.