It is a dogma of faith proclaimed by the Fourth Lateran Council under Innocent III that «The universal Church of the faithful is unique and outside of it absolutely no one can be saved». How on earth did Innocent III come up with being so rudely uninclusive, so blatantly biased, so obtusely certain that there is a true and a false, that good and evil exist and that he knows them? The concept that good and evil exist and how to actually establish them should be the ABC of any religion, without which you might as well just let it go. The pillar on which religion is based is called dogma, everything that is built on top of this initial pillar. Contrary to the new Church 2.0, all whipped cream and cotton candy, Christianity has an initial pillar which is made of granite, this pillar is the figure of Jesus Christ, which is not debatable and is not debatable and cannot be contradicted. Indeed Christianity, before being a religion, it was a historic event. Cristo, the third day, he was resurrected yes or no. If he has risen, we are right and the others are wrong, if he hasn't risen, the others are right and we are the ones who made the mistake. The fact that we can both be right about an event that either occurred or did not occur is contrary to the reality principle., which is a very cultured way of saying it's rubbish.
Having said this, Innocent III could not have been more courteous and inclusive and less dogmatic? No, he couldn't. The Gospel leaves no escape.
Gospel of St. John
«I am the way, truth and life. No one comes to the Father except through me".
In the Gospel it is written that the only truth is Christ. The only thing we can say to non-Christians is evangelization.
Gospel of Luke: «Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me, disperses", here too the margins for inter-religious dialogue seem slim to me.
Gospel of Matthew: «Do not give holy things to dogs and do not throw your pearls before swine, so that they don't trample them with their paws and then turn to tear you to pieces. » Here's there isn't even a little cotton candy, There is no tolerance here. Tolerance is not an evangelical value. Meekness is an evangelical value, I will fight your mistake to the death, but MINE not yours, right. But there is no tolerance. We must not tolerate evil. We cannot tolerate anyone living outside of Christ. A non-Christian cannot enter church: we must give him baptism. In my obstetrics textbook there were instructions for baptizing, if a child was dying and there wasn't a priest we had to do it ourselves.
There is no possibility of accepting other religions because the Gospel declares them false. Only Christ is the way. The task of a Christian when encountering a non-Christian is to convert him or die trying. A third is not given. If he does not do so he has denied Christ. This is very rude to other religions, I recognize it, really not very conciliatory, but the opposite would be very rude to Jesus Christ, because his Passion is considered useless. Or Christianity is the only religion that leads to the only God, or is it the most dysfunctional religion, minimum result with maximum effort. Jesus would have been whipped, the crown of thorns, Golgotha ​​and the crucifixion, an indescribable and atrocious pain, to achieve the same result that could be achieved by standing under a sycamore tree and going oooooooooom, or fighting wars throughout the Arabian peninsula with a certain number of wives and concubines and a third wife married when she was of a not exactly canonical age. As Saint Thomas explains, there are forms of salvation even for those who do not know Christ, but we are talking about people who do not know him, of individuals who have never heard of it. Where this knowledge exists, as is specified in the Gospel, he who has known and does not believe will be treated worse than the city of Sodom. Gospel of Saint Matthew.
«Woe to you, Corazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! Why, if the wonders that occurred among you had occurred in Tire and Sidon, they have been for some time now, dressed in sackcloth and sprinkled with ashes, they would have converted. Well, I tell you: on the day of judgment, Tire and Sidon will be treated less harshly than you. And you, Cafarnao, perhaps you will be raised up to heaven? You will fall to hell! Why, if the wonders that occurred among you had happened in Sodom, today it would still exist! Well, I tell you: on the day of judgment, the land of Sodom will be treated less harshly than you!».
If you don't believe it, you all go home, but if you believe it it is written here that the city of Sodom will go very badly and those who do not believe will go worse. Hence the new Church 2.0 with his delightful Father Martin, his rants at atheists and agnostics, abortionists speaking in church, and the fraternal kiss to those who do not belong to Christ, to us it seems slightly misaligned with the Gospel, and the term is slightly ironic.
Anyone who reads Scripture knows that the Lord always intervenes against his pride
Now we have seen a big hug and kiss between the Catholic hierarchy and the Grand Imam of al-Azhar al-Tayyib, the "friend and brother", in the name of peace. Peace is a great thing, especially for the Grand Imam of al-Azhar al-Tayyib who expressed himself with great enthusiasm towards any operation that leads to the death of Israeli citizens, and that he belongs to a religious system that is not very tender towards Christians and dissidents, but who are we to judge? According to the Gospel, which is not cotton candy, the Christian's task is to go to death, but don't reach any compromise. The martyrs of the Roman empire, those of Japan, those of Africa, those of the current era, they went peacefully to their deaths, including women and children, facing it for what it was: the rockiest road, but also safer and shorter to get to Paradise. We cannot compromise on faith, that the Father can only be reached from the Son, not even for the good intentions of improving the conditions of persecuted Christians.
So we sheep are increasingly perplexed, increasingly with the impression of being sheep without a shepherd, more and more with the impression that, while we drown in a mercy as round and plump as cotton candy, Christ is being contradicted, which is much worse than nonsense. It means that Christianity is finished. At its post remains a graceful universal religion, nice and well mannered, which offends no one and includes everything and the opposite of everything, full of good feelings, and if not really good at least nice, in delicious pastel shades.
source – https://www.silvanademaricommunity.it/2019/02/21/o-crediamo-o-non-crediamo-se-crediamo-il-vangelo-non-puo-essere-contraddetto/