Combattete with me. I am your voice.
These phrases disgust you? You find it wrong that a club that receives money from the state is named after the author of these sentences? Bene : I am at your voice. For having raised my opinion against all this I am undergoing two trials. My processes are a huge plus on the one hand, because they allow my words to bounce and even the huge army of enemy newspapers is forced to report them, but they have the disadvantage of costing me rivers of money.
I ask for help. I am your voice. So that this voice is not silenced, support me!
The statement that Mario Mieli was a pedophile is true and incontrovertible. Mario Mieli affirms his pedophilia in the text Elements of homosexual criticism.
The correct meaning of the word “pedophile” is: person erotically attracted to minors. Pedophilia is a mental condition characterized by erotic attraction to minors, condition considered by some to be a paraphilia or perversion, from the latest DSM it is considered a sexual orientation. Anyone who claims to be erotically attracted to children, regardless of whether or not he has committed pedophile acts, he can only be declared a pedophile.
Mario Mieli unequivocally declares his erotic attraction for children, that is, for people under the age of puberty, in his book Elements of homosexual criticism, initially published by Einaudi, in the latest edition by Feltrinelli.
“We revolutionary fags know how to see the child as a potentially free human being. We, Yes, we can love children. We can desire them erotically by responding to their desire for Eros, we can grasp with face and open arms the intoxicating sensuality they exude, we can make love with them. This is why pederasty is so harshly condemned: it addresses loving messages to the child than society, through family, traumatizes, educastra, nega, lowering the Oedipal grid onto his eroticism” (Mario Mieli, Elements of homosexual criticism, pag 55 PDF http://www.mariomieli.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Elementi_di_critica_omosessuale.pdf).
Read More
It is a dogma of faith proclaimed by the Fourth Lateran Council under Innocent III that «The universal Church of the faithful is unique and outside of it absolutely no one can be saved». How on earth did Innocent III come up with being so rudely uninclusive, so blatantly biased, so obtusely certain that there is a true and a false, that good and evil exist and that he knows them? The concept that good and evil exist and how to actually establish them should be the ABC of any religion, without which you might as well just let it go. The pillar on which religion is based is called dogma, everything that is built on top of this initial pillar. Contrary to the new Church 2.0, all whipped cream and cotton candy, Christianity has an initial pillar which is made of granite, this pillar is the figure of Jesus Christ, which is not debatable and is not debatable and cannot be contradicted. Indeed Christianity, before being a religion, it was a historic event. Cristo, the third day, he was resurrected yes or no. If he has risen, we are right and the others are wrong, if he hasn't risen, the others are right and we are the ones who made the mistake. The fact that we can both be right about an event that either occurred or did not occur is contrary to the reality principle., which is a very cultured way of saying it's rubbish. 
Il 73% of Italians would be in favor of euthanasia. This is confirmed by recent research by Eurispes. However, if we go on to discern the search criteria and the specific contents of the individual questions, we discover a slightly different reality. At least the 60% of Italians, for example, they declare themselves against assisted suicide, different from euthanasia only in modality but certainly not in substance. Not to mention the countless reservations expressed by that 73% of favorable ones, there is even one 77,5% of interviewees who would allow euthanasia only in the event of an "irreversible coma", or brain death, considered by most scientific literature as death everything short.
I was acquitted for "offending homosexual people" because it was recognized that speaking as I spoke was my right, Indeed it is my duty as a doctor. What I said on these topics can be said! Hurray! I was condemned for the sentences about the movement Lgbt whom I accused of ambiguous relationships with the pedophile movement and of attempts to limit freedom of speech". This is the outcome of 
Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team
A 8 and a half on La7 the doctor quotes the gay Mario Mieli who glorified pedophilia… Lilli Gruber remains stunned and speechless (VIDEO: Silvana De Mari is Lilli Gruber)
Rai co-produces a film about Mario Mieli. The contributions allocated by the previous government. But Northern League member Borgonzoni blocks everything. Pro-pedophilia content is targeted
Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team
The trial of the doctor and friend is taking place today in Turin Silvana De Mari, to which we have provided and provide all the support of “Circle Christ the King-Tradition”: