Marco Tosatti
Dear friends of the style of the Court, Super Ex (Ex from Avvenire, Ex of the Movement for Life and ex of various other things, but still not ex-Catholic, Despite….) he read about Future the article that my colleague Mia, the official "Famolo Stranista" of the PD's daily religious bulletin dedicated to the Verona Conference on families, and the March that concluded it. We think he didn't like it; at least judging from what he wrote to us...
Luciano Moia is Bergoglio's deputy at Avvenire. Since he married Amoris laetitia his quotes, first basin, they flew beyond the stars. That's what he's called, Today, to comment on the march for the family organized by the World Congress.
Moia is one of those who finally says what he thinks, or one who thinks what superiors ask him to think. I don't know which of the two is the right version. At the time of Dino Boffo he would never have written what he writes today. He's not the only one, for the truth. Without inconveniencing the big of the big contortionists, the one whose compass always turns towards Power, my thoughts turn to Paolo Rodari, Ciellino who was a traditionalist, at least when it comes to ethics, on the Reformist, and then in Giuliano Ferrara's Il Foglio when the newspaper was super Ratzingerian. Today Rodari is among the progressives to the bitter end, and she was happy to throw some digs at the family's supporters. The question applies to him too: he lied before, or he radically changed his mind later? But if the answer is the latter, what substance do these little journalists have??
To God the arduous sentence, we just need to go back to Moia.
Which sucks, joining the chorus of goats roaring at…. Moia writes: “The “Final Declaration” of the World Congress of Families in Verona, solemnly signed this morning at the end of the last day of work, builds another, gigantic, dream book".
For goodness sake, ask for help for families, condemn the womb for rent, etc., they are things that can be shared, explains, but it depends on who says them.
Gandolfini, Brandi, Cough, Ruiu… they can't. They do not have the CEI stamp, while the Bergy sticker, we don't know that: his, dice, he didn't notice anything; he didn't follow up. Maybe it would be better to say: his, he never follows these things.
In truth, Bergy never had a Family Day; this time, only because explicitly questioned, he took refuge behind the words of Pontius Pilate Parolin. A shot at the rim, a shot in the barrel, without saying anything, nor why.
Bergy is like that: when he doesn't want to say a truth of faith, invites you to read the catechism; when he has to answer about Viganò, invites you to read the dossier (that everyone has already read); when they ask him about Family Day, invites you to read the words of his highly skilled diplomat (one that if Jesus had had him by his side, it would have ended with tarallucci and wine, with the Pharisees, and they would have had not the two thieves crucified, but some good passers).
O Moia? We forgot. Because you already know where his articles go, before you start reading them.
Well Moia explains that there was no Forum at the march, that of Gigi Di Palo. Now that's serious stuff, well done: the Family Forum is “time-tested and truly represents four million families across 564 local associations, 47 national e 18 regional market" ! Instead, there were "perhaps ten thousand people" at the march!
I believed, Moia, believed. For those of Avvenire, faith is essential: they really believe, for example, that their newspaper sells the copies it claims, when everyone knows that most of them are gifts, almost imposed subscriptions etc... They believe it or pretend to believe it.
No, caro Moia, There were much, much more than ten thousand people at the march, and the Forum wasn't there, but there were many, privately, who are part of it, deaf to the sirens of the Moia, of the Parolins, of the Piddini bishops... As for the strength of the official Forum, the elegant one, which neither the substance nor the methods are wrong, the one with the tailcoat, Moia must have only one thing clear: the Forum no longer has any substance, so all ways are useless.
For a simple reason: who in the name of ways (which ones then? Write us some etiquette?) forget the substance, sooner or later it disappears or becomes insignificant.
And I conclude: many had already made a film. They thought that five years of Bergoglio would kill the Catholic laity. But the Catholic laity, when his generals vanish, they dissolve, others are found.
Very, but much better; capable of mobilizing the streets, those that Bergy hasn't filled for a long time. The ones that Spadaro dreams of for his pro-Juncker party!
source – http://www.marcotosatti.com/2019/04/01/super-ex-commenta-i-reportage-di-avvenire-su-verona-e-alcune-giravolte/