Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team

(AUTOMATIC READING – with a human voice)
I was unable to read the entire new international technical guidelines for sexual education approved by UNESCO. Not because they are in English – It's that flat English with a pretense of scientificity that isn't difficult to understand even for me – but because they give me a stomach ache. Starting with the title: “an evidence-based approach”.
Nothing but evidence. I have hardly read anything so ideologically oriented, but disguised as science: a series of apodictic judgments on the most intimate and delicate matter imaginable. Sexuality concerns the person and his integral development, and it is the least technical thing you can imagine. E’ at least scientifically provable, it is precisely one of those things where one cannot speak of evidence. You cannot teach a technique for living sexuality well. We can try to help form mature and balanced people, who will be able to give themselves to someone else and receive it as a gift in turn.
The other thing that stopped me from reading was the small print, apparently aseptic, a heading up there at the top left: “sustainable development goals”. We know that in Newspeak “sustainable development” refers to the global spread of contraception and abortion, let it never be that natural methods for responsible fatherhood and motherhood are taught: the mass is considered like the beasts.
Let's not talk about the cover photo: a row of kids little more than children, that they shouldn't even care about these matters, much less sustainable development because the idea of ​​having children should not even cross their minds, they are still children themselves. Icing on the cake: among the financiers of the intellectual work you find in your hands is the multinational abortion company, Planned Parenthood, Caught selling parts of babies killed in the womb. On the other hand, it is not surprising, given that the Unicef ​​consultant who worked on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Peter Newell, committed child abuse, in the company of others 3300 operators in the sector, who raped sixty thousand of the children they were supposed to help.
WHO IS BEHIND US?
Anyway, without scoffing at every word and ignoring financiers and authors (obviously with a large LGBT representation), Let's say straight away that the idea that the armed wing of the UN deems unquestionably Right and True, to be imposed through blackmail – in African countries, for example, those who do not accept the UN programs on contraception and abortion have their funding suspended by the International Monetary Fund – it's this one, in a nutshell: sexual pleasure is a right for everyone, from an early age. No one can say anything about the sexual life of children, not even their parents. The only thing to warn humanity about are pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases.
Obviously not with orderly conduct, but thanks to contraception, which is a basic right of every individual, and which pre-pubescent children urgently need to be informed about, so that when they then feel some itching, instead of wasting time listening to yourself, their own emotions, to learn the value of waiting, of love and sacrifice, they already know how to satisfy everything immediately, without risking paying any consequences. Obviously nothing should influence the sexual conduct of young people, nor the family (It's not science fiction, in some countries they begin to take away parental rights if it gets in the way), nor their very being sexual, i.e. male or female, because you are who you feel, also depending on the periods, a fluid being in the swamp.
I'm not good at seeing conspiracies, to find out who is behind it: Soros, freemasonry, those parties transformed into mass radicals that previously defended the workers now these pseudo-rights to mass unhappiness (if freedom brought happiness, why all those depressed faces around?).
I don't know who is running this gigantic deception. I know that those who support it have great funding and support on their side which to say is political would be an understatement. I know they speak their own code, we send signals of belonging (because otherwise Gentiloni, on the point of leaving, cited as a point of honor being part of a government that achieved civil unions and that other madness of the DAT, which only a massively depressed country can consider a success? There was no other government action to mention?).
WHAT WE CAN DO? FOR EXAMPLE THE FREEDOM BUS
I know that by doing courses in schools, occupy all communication, raise hysterical screams with a victimistic tone – “we are discriminated against” – customs and collective perception are changing. Exactly as happened with the 194, a terrible one, terrible law which, however, at least allowed abortion only in cases of very serious danger to the woman's life, and it has become a means of mass contraception and eugenic selection (so much so that even in the Church there are those who cannot say a sensible word to prevent an abortion for a frightened woman who is expecting a child with Down syndrome): the law is massively violated, and it is now a matter of custom, it changed mentalities and killed millions of children, destroyed millions of mothers.
While the costume changes, What weapons do we have?, apart from trying to live as best we can, testifying that there is beauty and convenience (but it's not enough to stop a mother who has decided to have an abortion, I can prove it, It's not even enough to tell her that you will adopt her child)? What can we do before the UN, all’Unesco, to the Monetary Fund, to the Ministry of Education, at Unar which, not even destroyed by scandals, they agreed to close, On the contrary? What can we do in the face of the new LGBT offensive in schools that is being prepared? […] In this battle against ideological colonization which is worse than the re-education camps of the great totalitarianisms of the 20th century – the Pope said it – we ask for freedom, even if we are certain that freedom is not doing what you want, but what is true. And we ask that in an ethically sensitive sphere such as sexuality, no one be imposed an education that is not shared by the family, and that it is not against the truth about man. Yet no boy should have the truth poured into his head as if it were an empty container. They should be turned on, only lit up the questions of truth that every boy already has on his own.
Like David with the slingshot and stones, we only have a great people ready to stand up. We have Sentinels Standing. We have the many souls of the Family day people. These days we have the Freedom Bus which left yesterday from Reggio Calabria and headed to Rome on 27 February.
We don't have much, and even in the Church there are those who are not at our side. We don't have much, but we know we are on the side of the Truth, and that's all that matters.