Why Israel struck Syria immediately after the Idlib agreement

Of Fulvio Scaglione
Why Israel struck Syria immediately after the Idlib agreement
Source: The eyes of war
The news of the latest events in Syria, from the first Russian bombings on Idlib province to American threats, from the Russian reconnaissance plane shot down by Syrian anti-aircraft due to the maneuvers of Israeli fighters to the missiles on Latakia to the phosphorus bombs dropped by the Americans on Deir Ezzor, it's obviously dramatic.
But the political background is more complex than it seems, in a certain sense, even less worrying. The game is the same as usual: control of Syria. Or better: the control of its fragmentation. A very powerful coalition for seven years, which goes from Saudi Arabia to the USA, from France to the United Kingdom, from Türkiye to Qatar, passing through a long series of countries that have been or are "de facto" accomplices, works to disintegrate the political and territorial unity of Syria.
These countries have not always shown perfect unity of action or political vision. Turkey, for example, after the failed coup of 2016, which Recep Tayyip Erdogan considers inspired by the USA, it took an autonomous path and built a sort of understanding with Russia and Iran. Nonetheless, that has always been the goal, under the slogan “Assad must go”. Such an important goal that, to reach it, the strange coalition has gradually bet on different horses. Read More

Share

Libya-Syria: who they support, who to cheer for

Of Fulvio Grimaldi
Amici, this time too we are long. Pardon. However for 15 days I'm out and, so, there is time to slowly make it. If you believe.

Let's face it: What good rulers are those of Al Qaeda and Isis!
For those cheering in Syria those there (don't let me mention them otherwise Facebook will ban me and delete the post) it's not difficult to know: just read the "New York Times”, golden standard of journalism perennially worthy of recognition, if not Pulitzer, di Reporters Without Borders (the media counterpart of Medicins Sans Frontières and equally dear to those there). If we thought that they were concentrated in the northwestern province of Idlib, welcomed, fed and armed by the old Turkish godfathers, all the ISIS and Al Qaeda cutthroats generously evacuated from the territories and cities they embellished with crosses weighed down by infidels, or with skins from the flayed bodies of dissidents, reading the "New York Times" frees us from the intoxication of similar fake news.
The authoritative newspaper that, if it hadn't been for the CNN assist, of the media of Atlanticist obedience with, in our small way, the "manifesto", he would have freed us from Milosevic with his pens alone, Saddam, Gaddafi, Assad is the Taliban, rectifies what has so far and for too long, almost eight years, it was false information, liar, fraudulent. Assad, with those hackers and trolls of Russian urbi et orbi interference, with those spirited flagellating Scythians, Iranians and Hezbollah, he wanted us to believe, with the support of kilometers of manufactured audiovisual materials, depicting vigilantes who skinned innocent people alive, they set them on fire, they either drowned them in cages or crucified them, or they married the women by the hour, that his country had been invaded, not by democratic opponents assisted by the "international community", but rather by a pack of Islamist maniacs activated by an "international community" in the throes of mass murderer psychopathy. As he claimed had happened in Libya and, then again, in Iraq.
No, no, the NYT and our local Pulitzers reward us with the privilege of the truth: Destiny is terrifying."of rebel fighters and their civilian supporters who, over seven years ago, they rose up to demand a regime change". It is deplored that the Syrian deputy prime minister allowed himself to define these good fighters as "terrorists"., the newspaper, to whom we owe much of the credibility of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction and the viagra supplied by Gaddafi to his soldiers to rape his fellow countrymen, he goes on to describe how the unjustly maligned rebels governed the province entrusted to them by the Turks well: “They behaved as legitimate government and public administration authorities, facilitating, among other things, cross-border trade with Turkey and organizing aid supplies to the population”. Seeing how good they are, they worry about feeding the population. Other than Assad, which in principle starves him.

Read More

Share

Problems in the Spanish enclave: Gaddafi's prophecy is coming true?

Related imageReporting of R.G.

Thursday more than 500 African migrants have crossed the separation barriers of the Spanish enclave of Ceuta and entered illegally into the EU. Already in 2011 when it seemed that nothing foreshadowed such a serious crisis, Libyan leader Gaddafi almost predicted something similar before his assassination.
This is echoed in the pages of newspapers around the world: early in the morning the Spanish and Moroccan civil guards attempted to prevent hundreds of aggressive migrants from crossing the border between Morocco and the EU. During what appears to be a premeditated attack, the police were attacked with flamethrowers, excrement and corrosive substances.
The police were at a loss because, although attacks had also occurred in Ceuta in the past, migrants had never had such violent reactions. In the area surrounding the Spanish enclave, tens of thousands of poor Africans are still waiting for their chance to enter Europe.

Although the number of new asylum requests to the EU has decreased this year, the migration crisis currently seems to have reached its highest point. Hundreds of migrants have shown that they are determined to enter the EU and no one will be able to stop them. Driven by desperation and hunger they are ready to risk their own lives and the lives of border agents to enter Europe. They don't accept “no”.
The violence they employ against the police is shocking and must be a warning sign for Brussels. So far the EU has not responded to this incident, ma, if a concrete action plan is not developed soon, there is the risk that violence and anarchy will also reach the heart of Europe.
Even before the start of the civil war of 2011 the Libyan dictator Gaddafi warned so:

“Listen to me carefully. If you want to suffocate and destabilize me, you will only play Bin Laden's game and help the armed groups of insurgents. The following will happen. You will be attacked by a wave of migration coming from Africa which will pour into Europe from Libya. There will be no one left here to stop them”.

At the time, Gaddafi probably never imagined that he was alone 6 months later he would be killed by rioters in the street after NATO's intervention. But with his warning Gaddafi was right although this does not intend to justify in any way the actions of the Libyan despot. Until 2011 Libya was the richest African country and the desired destination for the starving Eritrean and Nigerian populations.
As for the population, Libya was among the countries with the most immigrants in the world. Today Libya is a failed state in which there is a dual government but there is no order. The failure of this state has also destabilized neighboring countries. Difficult situations are observed practically from Nigeria to Somalia. During the civil war France and the USA actively supplied the Libyan rebels with weapons who naturally did not return them after the end of the war. Military equipment from Gaddafi's arsenals was looted. Thus Libya was formed into a real one “arms market”. The Humans Rights Watch organization thus warned after the end of the civil war: “It's the largest distribution of weapons we've ever seen. It will be a threat to the region in the coming decades”. A similar development could also be observed following the American interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan e, before the Russian intervention, also in Syria.

Today the majority of asylum applications in Germany are submitted by refugees from the above countries. Mostly Nigerians leave Africa for Europe, Eritrea, Somalia e Chad. More than 75% of refugees arriving in Europe by sea leave from Libyan ports.

The politics of the German Chancellor of “somehow we will make it” recalls the impotence of the Roman Empire shortly before its fall. The Romans failed to manage the migration crisis when the Goths were at the gates and entered the Empire during the attack of the Huns. Initially the Goths were welcomed peacefully, food was provided to them, but when flow became too important, the Romans started a war to stop the Goths.

Furthermore, the corrupt Roman authorities kept food for them and, when the Goths who lived in Rome realized this unfair treatment towards them, an insurrection broke out. The famous historian Alexander Demandr also listed other causes of the fall of the Roman Empire: “Decadence, greed, old-fashioned way of thinking, immobility and loss of national identity”. And today in Europe it seems that many citizens of the Union believe that everything is fine as long as they have a roof over their heads, they can go out to eat and take holidays. The fall of the Roman Empire began before the migration crisis, so the parallels are chilling. And the legendary quote from Cicero: “How long will our patience last??” proves more relevant than ever if addressed to German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Interior Minister Horst Seehofer.

Merkel's security policy towards migrants differs from her predecessor's policy, l’ex cancelliere Willy Brandt: “In our company they work approximately 2,5 millions of people representing other nations. We have reached the point of having to carefully evaluate where the ultimate limit lies beyond which we can no longer welcome other people and our social responsibility ends”.

Helmut Schmidt ten years later he warned:”More than 4 millions of foreigners are the maximum number for German society if we don't want to have serious problems. We will not be able to integrate more than 4,5 millions of foreigners without any negative consequences”. Today they live in Germany 10,6 millions of foreigners and there has been no talk of secure borders for some time. Horst Seehofer attempted together with Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz and the countries of the Visengrad group to present an alternative program for resolving the migration crisis. “Illegal immigrants must be expelled, border defense must be strengthened. In third countries, collection centers must be built for migrants whose asylum applications have been refused and the Frontex agency must be converted into a border police force”.

The main point of this program is the possibility of applying for asylum in the country of origin. So, after the Ceuta uprisings the question arises: what these centers should do and how they should be defended? The African population is growing very quickly and by 2050 will double until it reaches 2,5 billion. The flow of refugees driven by hunger, from economic problems, from corruption and a lack of prospects could increase. It is very likely that refugees will not accept the rejection of their asylum application and will leave for Europe anyway.

In Syria there is a glimmer of hope because that is where a large part of the refugees are currently heading “Europeans”. Thanks to Russian support for President Bashar al-Assad, it was possible to largely expel ISIS from Syria and interrupt the civil war. After the visit of the Russian delegation, the Syrian president confirmed that all refugees “safe repatriation will be guaranteed”. Active work is already being done on the repatriation of Syrian refugees from neighboring countries (Türkiye, Lebanon and Jordan) so that they can be an integral part of the country's recovery. It will probably be possible in the future to dialogue with Assad to conclude similar agreements for the repatriation of refugees.

Read More

Share

Save soldier Mohamed

Reporting of Federici Studies Center

This is who the 'untouchable' rebel groups of the Daara enclave are
Most of the rebel militias present in southern Syria in the Daara governorate (1400 square km ed 1 million people), they report to a 'control room' called the "Southern Front" (o Shoutern Front – SF) was established 14 February 2014 by the United States and is also supported by European countries, as well as Saudi Arabia and Jordan. The coalition (which groups approximately 49 militias as well as local operations rooms ), has a main operations room in Amman (which is nothing other than the branch of the 'Military Operations Center' (MOC) of the United States for Syria).
While the membership of the Southern Front is controversial - because even though it falls under the aegis of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) , it has generally dissociated itself from the political opposition, the Syrian National Coalition (SNC) – what is certain is that it is financed by the United States and its allies. Their militias receive help from Jordan while - as we know - the Syrian government is thus prevented in any way from asserting its rights or obviously acting in any way in Jordan.
Shoutern Front uses very powerful and widespread activity in the mainstream media and from many sources (including the non-governmental organization 'Carter Center' founded by former president Jimmy Carter), it is judged as an entity that brings together 'moderately religious' and secular groups . This judgment, however, conflicts with the proven correlation of many of its members with the al Nusra group and with the jihad financed by the Saudis.
The Southern Front operates in the Daara provinces , Kuneitra and Suwaida and a few days ago it was defended by the spokesperson of the American State Department who threatened the Syrian army with serious consequences, in case of continuation of the offensive on Daara and surrounding areas on a grand scale.
As opponents the Southern Front has the Islamic State in the Daara enclave through a faction called "Jaysh Khalid bin al-Waleed" (also for this reason this group is barred from entering Jordan and from any type of help through the channels activated by Amman).
Although many militants come from the same clans and sometimes the same extended families, the Southern Front is opposed by the Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham group. Furthermore, in the Daara area there is also the faction called Jund al-Malahem which was born in 2015 from a break with Jabbat al Nusra , affiliated with al Qaeda. Its leader was an emir of Jabhat al-Nusra in Deraa. Currently the militants of this group no longer receive salaries and their activity is very limited.
Currently both the US and Southern Front believe that the truce agreed in the de-escalation area is open-ended and confers the permanent ability to establish a Western-financed fiefdom removed from the sovereignty of the Syrian government. Indeed, things were different, the de-escalation area was intended to de-escalate tensions and start negotiations in which all parties would find an agreement for reunification , behind specific and fair guarantees.
Instead Southern Front continues to set its sights on Damascus which is located in 100 km from the Daara enclave and its leaders do not hide that the conflict will not end with reconciliation but with the final victory against Assad.
In March 2018 hostilities resumed leading up to the imminent offensive of the Syrian army. Any chance of negotiation was promptly rejected by the Southern Front.
While the Syrian government has been trying to negotiate a possible agreement to ease the situation in the southern part of the country, in response, local militant groups became active by launching a preventive battle against the Syrian army.

Read More

Share

Israel takes the bait, Syria does not

Of Tony Cartalucci
Israel takes the bait, Syria does not
Source: Aurora site
Israel has repeatedly hit Syria with missiles and rockets, the most recent exchange took place after Israel declared that “Iranian rockets” had hit Israeli army positions in the Golan Heights which it illegally occupies. Titles, as ofIndependent, “Israel and Iran on the brink of war after the bombing of Syria in response to the alleged attack on the Golan Heights“, attempt to portray Israeli aggression as self-defense. L’Independent, However, it provided no evidence to confirm Israel's claims. For facade, with Iran inexplicably launching missiles against Israel, unprovoked and gaining no tactical advantage, strategic or political, the credibility of Israel's narrative is further eroded. But perhaps it is US public policy that designates Israel as a hostile provocateur charged with expanding Washington's proxy war against Damascus, to reveal the lethal and deceptive game that Israel and the Western media play. For years, US politicians have admitted in their newspapers that the US wants regime change in Iran and is trying to provoke a war to achieve it. Read More

Share

How much longer will we continue to pretend that the Palestinians are not a people?

Of Robert Fish
How much longer will we continue to pretend that the Palestinians are not a people?
Source: Comedonchisciotte
Monstrous. Frightening. Wicked. It's strange like today, in Middle East, the words are simply missing. Sixty Palestinians dead. In one day. Two thousand four hundred injured, more than half from live ammunition. In one day. These numbers are an outrage, an escape from morality, a source of infamy for every army.
And we should believe that the Israeli army is that of the “purity of weapons”? And we have another question to ask. If I'm there this week 60 Palestinian deaths per day, what will happen if there are any next week 600? O 6.000 next month? Israel's squalid justifications (and the crude American response) they raise exactly this question. If we can now accept a massacre of this magnitude, how long our immune system can handle in the days, in the weeks and months to come? Read More

Share

Israel and the subversion of every international balance

Of Paolo Sensini
Israel and the subversion of every international balance
Source: Paolo Sensini
Israel once again confirms itself as one of the major vectors of instability in the Near and Middle East: not only did he support the jihadist cutthroats of al-Nusra (al-Qaeda in Syria) on the Golan Heights for its own strategic calculations, but has carried out hundreds of missile attacks and provocations against Syrian neighbors since the beginning of the so-called Arab Spring in 2011. The last of which was carried out on 8 May with the launch of missiles against a Syrian base on the southern outskirts of the countryi Damasco. But now that in Syria his plans to subvert the Assad regime have hit the wall, Israel wants to reopen another war front against Iran at all costs. With what reasons? Simple, because as Prime Minister Netanyahu illustrated, the Islamic republic is carrying out a nuclear development program. But there is no concrete evidence to support this thesis, except for a certain number of materials stolen by the Mossad from an Iranian government warehouse dating back to that period 1999-2003. Thus a possible military attack on the country of the Ayatollahs would have a good chance of turning out to be a new edition of what happened with weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. From this point of view, President Trump's unilateral decision to terminate the international agreement on the Iranian nuclear power, which, moreover, never led to the end of sanctions against the Islamic Republic by the United States, it is a seal of the Israeli maneuver. In the midst of this political-media saraband that threatens to drag the world into the abyss, however, there is something left unsaid that Western countries, but also Israel's Islamic allies in the region such as Saudi Arabia, they certainly don't dream of reporting: i.e. that the Jewish State has built an atomic arsenal of approximately 250 nuclear warheads, all in absolute silence and without allowing its laboratories to ever be inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency (DEBT). But the problem is always the arsenals of the “others”, without even a shred of concrete proof, never those in possession of the Israelis. In short, yet another scene in which the ox says cuckold to the donkey. But by dint of playing with fire, it can happen that you get burned. E, if you look closely, we're not that far away. Read More

Share

Who knows why they call them non-governmental organizations, better known by the acronym NGO?

Of Paolo Sensini
Who knows why they call them non-governmental organizations, better known by the acronym NGO?
Source: Paolo Sensini
Who knows why they call them non-governmental organizations, better known by the acronym NGO? Almost all of them are in fact direct emanations of States that, no longer being able or willing to enter personally as actors in the conflicts they trigger everywhere, they invented this "humanitarian" formula which works much better with journalistic and television storytelling. Take for example the case of the photogenic White Helmets, jumped to the honors of the croborn with the war in Syria. What do we know about these characters led by James Le Mesurier, former officer of the English army and official of Her Majesty's Intelligence Service? Which are a group paid by 2013 with approx 32 million dollars from USAID, plus dozens more received from British governments, Dutch, French and the inevitable fiefdom-monarchies of the Gulf. They are the leader of a number of so-called NGOs, but more strictly OG (Government organizations), financed by Washington and London «for a peaceful political transition in Syria». And we emphasize peaceful. The same organization, to understand each other, which denounced the last two "chemical attacks against civilians" and blamed them on the Syrian government, like the one on the outskirts of Khan Sheikhoun in April 2017 and the last of 4 April in Duma, at the gates of Damascus. Attacks that, in both cases, even before establishing the real dynamics of the facts, they were subjected to bombing by the French-English-American Trimurti. Then the White Helmets, like hundreds of other organizations of the same type, they are nothing more than a long arm of governments and secret services which cannot (or they don't want to) no longer arrive directly with their soldiers on the battlefield. A cover, In short, and not even very successful, that for a while’ of years is systematically used in the most fiery scenarios. Now the "volunteers" with the white helmets are denouncing a new possible chemical attack against the jihadist cutthroats in the province of Idlib, north-west of Syria, this time attributing the responsibility to an air raid by the Russians. Vero, not true, it doesn't matter. Also because, as has always occurred, There has never been any responsibility for chemical attacks by Bashar al-Assad, but by now the "punitive" bombings by the Westerners had taken place and what was seen was seen. After the example of the cases cited, it doesn't take long to imagine what the outcomes of the new case reported in Idlib could be, but by dint of provocations it could happen that the Russians decide to respond tit-for-tat. And at that point it is difficult to imagine what the developments will be. Or maybe we imagine it very well. Read More

Share

It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran

Of Editorial team
The effort of those who curate this Catholic-traditionalist or integral Catholic site is to help understand the facts that happen in the world. We don't give “magisterial definitions”, we don't produce “kill the game”, we hate niche intellectualism and snippets that no one reads. We love current events because by trying to delve deeper into them we believe we can keep our feet on the ground, with realism and pragmatism, avoiding flights of fancy and drifts of various kinds, which seem grotesque to us, such as ecumania to raise cash, the Freemasonmania that sees lodges even in the coffee cup, the conspiracy mania that NEVER sees the facts as they are but NECESSARY with a conspiracy, nostalgia for dead historical eras, that will never return, the “speckling” of Tradition, through hypocritical personalisms. The articles that are reported to us or those that we write are only contributions to the search for the Truth or harsh criticisms of modernity, in the wake of writers, authors, authoritative thinkers who preceded us.
We do it with the style of publicly engaged lay people, therefore journalistic or essayistic e, Obviously, not everything we publish by other authors involves adhering to their thoughts or actions. This is not Pravda nor Osservatore Romano. E’ a free space, sometimes provocative, It's not mainstream, follows a very clear line, which is integral Catholic and identitarian, open to constructive criticism. We know that most of our many readers (circa 2.000 daily on average, but with very high peaks, that reach the 10.000 on some occasions) he knows what he testifies. We know that you can't please everyone and that's part of it “game”. For those who persist in not wanting to understand this guideline: let's deal with it.
Of Tim Black
It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran
Source: Comedonchisciotte
If there is anything that can be indicative of how superficial and provocative the airstrikes against Syria have been, this is the almost desperate refusal of the United States and its allies to take responsibility for the consequences, intentional or not, of attacks.
We were told it was a targeted mission, self-sufficient, and that its objectives have been completely met. Jim Mattis, the United States Secretary of Defense, he called the attacks “isolated” and nothing more than that. Even more revealing, Boris Johnson, UK Foreign Secretary, he said the attacks were limited to preventing the chemical weapons “taboo” from being undermined, stating that “the Syrian war will continue as before”. Read More

Share

Assad restituisce la Legion d'onore alla Francia: "Non è un onore avere un'onorificenza di un paese schiavo degli USA"

https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/resizer/resiz/public/5ad9ace308f3d9f3438b4568.jpg/526x275c50.jpg

CONTINUE ON:

https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/dettnews-assad_restituisce_la_legion_donore_alla_francia_non__un_onore_avere_unonorificenza_di_un_paese_schiavo_degli_usa/82_23756/ Read More

Share
1 2