For those cheering in Syria those there (don't let me mention them otherwise Facebook will ban me and delete the post) it's not difficult to know: just read the "New York Times”, golden standard of journalism perennially worthy of recognition, if not Pulitzer, di Reporters Without Borders (the media counterpart of Medicins Sans Frontières and equally dear to those there). If we thought that they were concentrated in the northwestern province of Idlib, welcomed, fed and armed by the old Turkish godfathers, all the ISIS and Al Qaeda cutthroats generously evacuated from the territories and cities they embellished with crosses weighed down by infidels, or with skins from the flayed bodies of dissidents, reading the "New York Times" frees us from the intoxication of similar fake news.

The authoritative newspaper that, if it hadn't been for the CNN assist, of the media of Atlanticist obedience with, in our small way, the "manifesto", he would have freed us from Milosevic with his pens alone, Saddam, Gaddafi, Assad is the Taliban, rectifies what has so far and for too long, almost eight years, it was false information, liar, fraudulent. Assad, with those hackers and trolls of Russian urbi et orbi interference, with those spirited flagellating Scythians, Iranians and Hezbollah, he wanted us to believe, with the support of kilometers of manufactured audiovisual materials, depicting vigilantes who skinned innocent people alive, they set them on fire, they either drowned them in cages or crucified them, or they married the women by the hour, that his country had been invaded, not by democratic opponents assisted by the "international community", but rather by a pack of Islamist maniacs activated by an "international community" in the throes of mass murderer psychopathy. As he claimed had happened in Libya and, then again, in Iraq.

No, no, the NYT and our local Pulitzers reward us with the privilege of the truth: Destiny is terrifying."of rebel fighters and their civilian supporters who, over seven years ago, they rose up to demand a regime change". It is deplored that the Syrian deputy prime minister allowed himself to define these good fighters as "terrorists"., the newspaper, to whom we owe much of the credibility of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction and the viagra supplied by Gaddafi to his soldiers to rape his fellow countrymen, he goes on to describe how the unjustly maligned rebels governed the province entrusted to them by the Turks well: “They behaved as legitimate government and public administration authorities, facilitating, among other things, cross-border trade with Turkey and organizing aid supplies to the population”. Seeing how good they are, they worry about feeding the population. Other than Assad, which in principle starves him.

Those who the NYT, always careful to distinguish good and bad, in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, complying with Bush's suggestions, Cheney, Rumsfeld, various neocons, FBI and CIA, he had identified as Al Qaeda terrorists who had declared war on America and immediately killed them 3000 citizens, while always proudly declaring themselves members of Al Qaeda (Al Nusra, which is the same), if not the even more terrorist Isis, now for the same newspaper they have become "rebels, opponents, fighters, rebel fighters, rebel forces, the strongest rebel faction in Syria”. And not even a shadow of embarrassment at the fact that Washington continues to brand Al Qaeda-Al Nusra as a "terrorist organization". It's the NYT, with its tribal representatives, that dictates the line: stewardship will follow.

To these limits, which make paradox an obsolete term, many others have gone further. From us, particularly impressive “A Bridge to”, transited by the denunciation of the Iraqi genocide, to the full understanding of every Western motivation. Idem Assopace, historic organization supporting the Palestinians, which months ago ventured into an analysis of the good governance of Al Qaeda in the areas they administer, even John McCain who shared the kebab with these good administrators was left speechless. And not only that.

Yet another “appalling Assad bloodbath”

The same work to defend and rehabilitate jihadists is done at newsstands and unified screens, left, right and left in harmonic harmony, but using more subtle criteria: we cannot ennoble those who until yesterday were the mercenaries who pulverized Palmyra and skinned prisoners. The new line is “the victim population”. Victim of the imminent carnage of Assad and his allies. A province of one and a half million Syrians disappears, subjected to the regime of the Turkish invader and to the impositions and proven tortures of this hired soldiery. (it is calculated at 50 thousand, including family members) evacuated from the liberated areas and appears on the screens, among the rubble of the first Russian bombings, a terrified population, White helmets running everywhere pretending to help, reappeared on the scene despite the disgrace following the wages received from the aggressor governments and the flight to Israel. Have you noticed the silence that accompanied and favored the total obliteration of Raqqa, by US missiles and Kurdish cannons? Then you saw, much later, the Dresden-like images of what was one of the largest and most prosperous Syrian cities?

The Aleppo model is repeated, Homs, Exit, Deir ez Zor. Everywhere a state exercises its right, sanctioned by international law and the UN (although obliterated by the current butler of the warmongers, Guterres), to liberate its territories invaded by the aggressor, a huge chorus of mourners, again synchronic left left and right, clergy obviously in the lead, raises shrill screams and anguished jeremiads about the genocide that looms over the civilian population. It almost seems as if Attila's mobs are attacking a nursery, rather than the regular army of a sovereign state, attacked by half the world, which defends its territory by liberating the last province occupied by those who have on their account several hundred thousand massacred civilians and defenders and a devastated country.

Very far from any solution that would benefit the safety of the Syrians locked up in Idlib, for the fanfares of the civilian apocalypse it is the obvious and only correct and realistic hypothesis. The governments that fueled the assault on Syria by recruiting bandits from halfway around the world, NATO and Türkiye in the lead, take them back and send them back to their countries of origin: Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Afghanistan, Qatar, Chechnya and various European countries. They can do it since it is on their money and their armaments that this mercenary depends. And not even a child from Idlib would be harmed. And the White Helmets would have to spend their London wages on the slot machines, instead of setting up little children painted red. Unfortunately, Erdogan's persistent desire to connect Idlib to the other occupied Syrian enclave prevents this, Afrin, in order to consolidate its hold on this Syrian border territory. The other being the one occupied by the US with the assistance of Kurdish mercenaries.

Assad the chemist. It could have been missing?

Unmissable, the discredited stereotype of a chemical attack by a government that deprived itself of all its chemical weapons four years ago is resurrected, under international surveillance, while chemical weapons in quantities were seen appearing among the mercenaries' depots and laboratories and those attributed to the government were found to be non-existent. Chemical attack howled from all Western mouths of vitriol, to which it is added, to strengthen the diabolization of the Russians, the revival of the highly discredited British farce of the poisoning of the two Skiprals, at the hands of reckless Russian agents whom the equally reckless Putin had sent to kill old retired spies on the eve of the football World Cup in Russia. Just to arouse more sympathy in the West and see a few more sanctions imposed.

A certain weakening of the barking about Assad's chemical intentions occurred when Syrian and Russian intelligence managed to anticipate the plot and document the supply of chemical weapons to Idlib terrorists via shipments organized by the White Helmets. Which didn't discourage Nicky Haley, the crazy US ambassador to the UN, that moved forward on the chemical threat”undoubtedly Assad's" . But the stupidest and most ardent of the brigade did not give up. An echo, that of Macron, that bounces late and pathetic, but perhaps still functional to provocation. “If they use chemical weapons, we will intervene"he who "the poster" shot himself belly-in and chest-out , gloating over the insults hurled by the Rothschildite at the Italian rulers, he named “leader of the European progressive front”.

Source: https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/dettnews-libiasiria_per_chi_tifano_per_chi_tifare/82_25329/