Uncategorized

L'intervista. Venetians: "In ballo due visioni dell'Europa. Anti-fascism? Indecent alibi"
by

The mere presence of the sovereign option is a positive fact, capable of awakening Europe from its torpor. And they will be able to team up because the political enemy is internationalism, not the sovereignism of the neighbor. Marcello Veneziani is sure of it, writer and intellectual, what a wand the attitude of those who would like to make dissent a "crime and phobia".
Towards the vote for the European elections, what are the sides on the field?
“It seems clear to me that this time there is the possibility of choosing between two different ideas of Europe and sovereignty: the one represented by the national-populist-sovereignist movements and the one represented by all the others, ready to join forces despite their different origins to face the enemy. However you judge it, It already seems positive to me that for the first time and in any case after many years we are not called to vote within a pre-established perimeter of options, but between two clearly different political messages. Sovereignism not only awakens national affiliations but, if we want, awakens Europe from the dogmatic sleep it has been in for too many years".
Observers are betting on the advance of sovereignism. How he explains it? Costo propose, the many acronyms (in Italy and abroad)? There is no risk of confusing the electorate?
“Despite the different national articulations and the different political and cultural options, it seems to me that the underlying theme of sovereignism is to restore territorial sovereignty, national, popular and political, and to protect borders, to protect economies. Two models face each other: one who wants to assert European sovereignty outside Europe in international relations, cheap, in emigration, in military strategies, in hot areas of the planet such as the nearby Middle East and Maghreb. And the other who wants to assert European power within Europe, on the states, on the nations, on the European peoples. Sovereignism is widely spread because it speaks the language of reality, expresses the discomfort of the people, the search for security, the barrier to migratory flows, the rejection of oligarchies and their ideological codes".
Read More

Share
events

The same causes produce the same effects, we are moving towards a generalized social revolt
by

Of Alain de Benoist
Source: Barbadillo
I'd like to ask you a quick question about a series of recent events. E, at first, It's about the fire of Notre-Dame de Paris.
“The Madonna in flames, hit in the choir, it is the very image of Christianity today. What else can we say that hasn't already been said? I think of Dominique Venner and re-read Péguy”.
The end of the "great debate" and Emmanuel Macron's press conference, which does not seem to convince two out of three French people?
“The head of state was wrong to mistake the French for the mougeons (half sheep and half pigeons). Micron, resignation!”.
The yellow vest movement, is regularly described as “running out of steam” and generating “unacceptable violence”. What do you think??
A peaceful movement, “good-natured” would not have gotten a tenth of what the yellow vests got, even though none of their essential demands have been met yet. Violence (I don't mean that of professional "casseurs".) sometimes it's the only way to be heard. 14 July 1789, The storming of the Bastille was no walk in the park! Review Georges Sorel's reflections on violence. In any case, this popular violence is little comparable to the systemic violence of white-collar predators, identity killers, of social destroyers and masters of profit. As for the worries of the yellow jackets, it's about, at best, of a break before the next battles. Throughout Europe, the middle classes are disappearing and people are bearing the consequences of austerity policies. In our hourglass-shaped society, wealth is piling higher and higher, while poverty and precariousness are constantly increasing downwards. The same causes produce the same effects, we are moving towards a generalized social revolt.
Read More

Share
Uncategorized

The shame of the left that exploits the foibe to celebrate the 25 April
by

Fdi MP Federico Mollicone denounces: “In view of 25 April these posters appeared which exploit the tragedy of the foibe to attack the government, “infoibando” Cool and 5 position. It's a shame. The memory of those who lost their lives is insulted, and the pain of family members. Raggi remove this rubbish immediately and those responsible must be arrested. Stop the denialist barbarism”.

Share
Actuality

Every form of liberalism is the enemy of the community
by

Of Alain de Benoist
Source: Barbadillo
Against liberalism. Society is not a market (ed. of the Rock) is the new book by Alain de Benoist, in bookstores in France for a few days. Yann Vallerie, of the online newspaper Breiz-info.com interviewed the French philosopher.
Breizh-info.com. You publish a new book entitled “Against liberalism. Society is not a market". Because it is important to immediately underline that it is a criticism of liberal ideology and not of bureaucracy or an attack on the freedom to undertake, to circulate, d’agire, to think, to have free will? Read More

Share
Policy

Forza Italia's Finian retaliation, today it's like Future and Freedom
by


Forza Italia at the end of the game is - in retaliation - a kind of Future and Freedom.
Well, Yes: it's like Fli, the party that - speaking while I was alive - belonged to Gianfranco Fini and which everyone liked because yesterday's Silvio Berlusconi was very displeased.
As in the past, so in the present.
Like Giorgio Napolitano, just to sabotage Donizetti's Berlusconi, accompanied every step of the post-fascist with glasses - he deluded him into taking it to Palazzo Chigi - so Sergio Mattarella, at the Quirinale, he takes a breather from talking to the head of Forza Italia rather than seeing the yellow-green barbarians around him.
Like yesterday Fini, remote controlled, spoke of "republican patriotism", so today Berlusconi - unrecognizable in his second running board - rambles on about "Western democracies" canceling the more subversive Silvio, the one that unleashed the anathemas of Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy.
Corsi, historical recurrences and turning points, it's worth saying. Read More

Share
Monsters council

The case. Ecclesia Dei Commission towards suppression. What happens at the Tridentine Mass?
by

The news, for the recent history of the Catholic Church [CONCILIATE], has some importance. According to rumors reported on 26 December from the Messainlatino.it blog, subsequently confirmed by the Vatican correspondent Marco Tosatti, the Pope is about to suppress the Ecclesia Dei Commission, transforming it into an Office of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Externally it looks like a simple legal reorganization, since the Commission is already related to the former Holy Office, but from an ecclesiastical point of view a chapter opens with unexpected implications.
Read More

Share
Policy

Focus. “The naked right” by Baldoni: lights and shadows of the Msi/An experience
by

Giorgio Almirante, secretary of the MSI

For decades Adalberto Baldoni has dedicated himself with passion and historiographical acumen to the reconstruction of the environment, of political choices, of the theoretical-political debate of the Italian "Right".. We believe that in his latest effort he achieved his highest point iter of a researcher. In the “Final Reflection” of the book that we are about to present it is defined as “a scrupulous and objective reporter in search of the truth” (p. 684). Actually, in the pages of Right wing without veils 1946-2017. History and background from the birth of the MSI to today, recently in bookstores for the publisher Fergen (for orders: fe.gen@libero.it, euro 22,00), has proven to be a worthy historian.
In over seven hundred pages of the volume, makes a wealth of documents available to the reader, on the history of the MSI and AN, endless and discusses it critically. The book can be read in one sitting: it is not built solely on objective analyses, but he is animated by profound empathy for the object investigated. In the opinion of the writer this should not be considered a limitation, on the contrary! The empathetic approach opens up unsuspected aspects of scientific non-fiction, enriches it with personal experience, intense and painful. They can be valid, what a fitting introduction to these pages by Baldoni, the words that Beppe Niccolai said to present another of his works "Your book, you see, It has the merit of making us think. It is a great merit, above all because it takes us straight to a fundamental consideration: “inside” us there is the material to build, to engrave, to leave your mark, to weave a perspective of change” (p. 427-428). Read More

Share
Actuality | Non-fiction

Economic sanctions? Wars under false names
by

Of Alain de Benoist
Economic sanctions? Wars under false names
Source: Barbadillo
Alain de Benoist, as soon as a country poses a problem, we are now talking about "international sanctions", which are increasingly similar to American sanctions. But what exactly is the meaning and legitimacy of this sanctions policy?
“The policy of sanctions is not a policy. It is a form of warfare that uses only “peaceful” means to blur the line between war and peace. Just like the block, whose sanctions constitute the modern form, this war is similar to maritime warfare, still favored by the thalassocratic powers – England once, the United States today – which is also a trade or economic war: the “war on trade”, formerly known as the “race war”. It's a "total" war, not only because it rejects the classic distinction between combatants and non-combatants, but also because it is more often based on a “right” theory of war, which equates the enemy to a criminal or delinquent. Read More

Share
Actuality | Non-fiction

Identity and sovereignty? They are inseparable notions
by

Of Alain de Benoist
Identity and sovereignty? They are inseparable notions
Source: Barbadillo
Signor Alain de Benoist, in some environments, we tend to oppose two notions that everyone talks about today: identity and sovereignty. Nel Front National, Marion Maréchal-Le Pen would have represented the first, in opposition to Florian Philippot, which above all defends the second. Such opposition seems legitimate to her?
“Interviewed a few weeks ago by Causer magazine, Marine Le Pen said: "My project is intrinsically patriotic because it defends the sovereignty and identity of France in the same movement. When you forget one of the two, and the bar". So, we don't cheat. Because they should see themselves in the identity and sovereignty of opposing ideas, when they are complementary? Sovereignty without identity is but an empty shell, identity without sovereignty has every possibility of transforming into ectoplasm. So you don't need to separate them. One and the other, Furthermore, they are part of freedom. To be sovereign is to be free to decide your own policy. Preserving one's identity implies, for a people, to be able to freely decide the conditions of one's own social reproduction".
While identity is a necessarily vague concept, sovereignty is no longer easy to define?
“Less than it seems. The “one and indivisible” sovereignty recalled by Jean Bodin in The Six Books of the Republic (1576) it has little to do with sovereignty based on subsidiarity and the principle of sufficient competence, of which Althusius speaks in 1603 in his Politica methodice digesta. Bodin's approach is eminently modern. It implies the nation-state and the disappearance of the distinction that was previously made between power (power) and the authority or dignity of power (authority). Read More

Share