A WAY OF THE CRUCIS IN WHICH CHRIST IS' ONLY THE PRETEXT OF THE GROTTESCAN BERGOGLIAN PROPAGANDA

of Baronio
In the Way of the Cross the faithful accompanies the Lord in the last moments of His earthly life, from the death sentence to the deposition from the Cross. In this pious exercise, which takes on an even more emblematic value on the very day in which the Church commemorates the Passion and Death of the Savior, we turn to Our Lord, It is contemplated with compassion, we meditate on His Pains and those of His Most Holy Mother: everything converges on the suffering Redeemer, flagellated, crowned with thorns, loaded with the Cross, pierced by nails, pierced by the spear. And it repeats, for centuries: Adobranch you, Christ, and we bless you: because through your holy cross you redeemed the world. It is on the Cross that Christ saved the world, and only by uniting with the redemptive Passion can every Christian participate – with their own suffering, with their own sacrifices, with the trials that God grants him – to the fruits of grace that the Son of God conquered as a ransom for the guilt of Adam and our sins.

The celebration of Way of the Cross which will be held on Parasceve Friday this year in the presence of Bergoglio shifts the centrality of the rite, in a blasphemous way, from the suffering Christ to the victims of immigration, to those drowned in the Mediterranean, to the refugees who flee from that poverty for which those who reject Christ and the Church are responsible. And who are equally responsible for the invasion plan of a Europe, than of Christian charity and assistance to the poor, to the poor, she has been an example to the needy for centuries, until the revolutionary hordes violently took away the means with which to carry out their work of material and spiritual assistance. Because we talk about Charity, not of solidarity: deaf secularist and Masonic parody of the highest of the theological Virtues, which starts from the love of God to reach the love of neighbor for love of Him.

Christ the High Priest and Immaculate Victim offered himself on the altar of Golgotha ​​to the Divine Majesty in expiation of our sins, to redeem us from the slavery of the devil as long as we fulfill – as He accomplished – the will of the Father. Against the I will not serve of Satan, obedience until death, and the death of Croce, of the Son of God made Man. Only the sacrifice of a God could repair the infinite offense towards the Creator; and only with the sacrifice of the new Adam could this reparation be extended, in a renewal of creation, to the adopted children of God, that is, to those who have put on the wedding dress without which it is impossible to be admitted to the banquet. A voluntary sacrifice, chosen and accepted from eternity, and performed only in the established time. And perpetuated ever since on our altars in a bloodless form through the Holy Mass.
This has nothing to do with the involuntary victims of a series of accidents and misfortunes that they not only did not choose, but which are not inflicted on them out of hatred for Christ. The refugee who is pushed away from his land and family, by those who want to exploit and usurp the resources of their country; the unfortunate woman who is sold by unscrupulous criminals and then forced into prostitution in Europe; the child whose organs are removed and sold to clinics in Israel, in China or in the Emirates they are victims of an injustice that certainly requires a unanimous response among the good, inspired by Charity. And it is the mission of the Church not only to lift the poor and the dispossessed in their suffering, but also teach them that those sufferings, if they embrace the Cross of Christ, they are salvific for themselves and for others, including their persecutors. Only the atheist is scandalized by suffering, of death, of the disease: since he denies the fact that they are a just consequence of original sin, how much, in Christ, be an instrument of redemption and, in His children regenerated in Baptism, of sanctification.
The meditations of Way of the Cross (Who) written by Sister Eugenia Bonetti, Consolata Missionary and President of the Association Slaves no more, they are disconcerting to say the least, if not scandalized. They represent an indigestible anthology of demagogy and thought mainstream in which the Passion of Christ is only the pretext to make globalist propaganda. Always the same process Bergoglian: the container is apparently the same, the content is altered, disfigured, distorted. And what is horrifying is seeing how a religious woman committed to fighting the sexual exploitation of immigrant women lends herself to the grotesque farce of Santa Marta.
«Collected in this place, in which thousands of people have suffered martyrdom in the past for remaining faithful to Christ, we now want to travel this "via painful" together with all the poor, to the excluded from society and the new crucified in today's history, victims of our closures, of powers and legislation, of blindness and selfishness, but above all of our hearts hardened by indifference. This is an illness from which we Christians also suffer» (ibid., pag. 5).
I «new crucifixes in today's history» rather, they are the martyred Christians and those persecuted by that same world which also creates the conditions for that poverty and injustice. Those for whom the conciliar sect never says a word, while he does his best to demonstrate fraternal closeness as soon as a Muslim or an Israelite is killed or wounded, but also just mocked. The «thousands of people have suffered martyrdom in the past for remaining faithful to Christ» today they have become millions, in the silence of Santa Marta. Their silent cry rises in condemnation of'imposture, which mocks the heroic coherence of the Martyrs, to whom he would advise to choose the path of dialogue, of the compromise, of incense to idols. In the Bergoglio era, Martyrs are considered fanatics, fundamentalists, dogmatists incapable of accepting «the different».
There is no need to go to Africa, in Arab countries or China: persecution is spreading day by day in once Christian Europe, in America, in Australia; in the countries civilians which require those who want to work to sign a declaration accepting principles contrary to the Gospel, such as the presumed right to abortion, to the theory gender This is GLBT delusion. Those countries where, in the name of tolerance and secularism, he allows himself to blaspheme God and the Virgin, to vandalize and desecrate thousands of Catholic churches, while anyone who jokes about Mohammed or draws a swastika on a wall is punished with prison.
On the day in which the Passion of the Pure and Holy Victim is celebrated, it sounds shameful to compare the «victims of our closures, of powers and legislation» to the Son of God, that those victims ask us to love and convert, but for His love, not for philanthropism or for a horizontal brotherhood that denies God and His holy Law. Even more shameful if this falsification is the work of a nun who should know well the difference between the atrocious punishments suffered by the divine Redeemer to free us from the yoke of the Evil One, and the human suffering of the unfortunate that a perverse and wicked society drags onto our sidewalks.
I wonder if a «heart hardened by indifference» does not end up denying the Sacrifice of Christ, preferring the more comfortable path of deploring the evils of the world, shared in words by anyone, but which inexorably remains a human work devoid of the life-giving inspiration of Christian Charity. Since the instigator of those meditations – of which Sister Eugenia slavishly quotes entire pericopes – he is the same one who clearly made it clear that works of mercy cannot and must not contemplate any apostolic intent, nor seek the conversion of anyone: «Proselytism is solemn nonsense» and an obstacle to ecumenical dialogue. The body of the poor can be healed, but not his soul. The exploited publican can be removed from the street in the suburbs, but not from the path of damnation. The refugee must be welcomed, but do not instruct him in the Truths of the Faith so that he shares with us not only earthly food, but also the Bread of Angels. Man does not live by bread alone.
And we don't understand why next of which the Gospel speaks is always and invariably remote, not only geographically but also spiritually and culturally: they are perhaps worth less, before God, the poor Italians who rummage through bins looking for something to feed themselves and sleep under the porticoes of our cities, because the charitable organizations have decided to help only Mohammedans and idolaters, moreover with state subsidy? He is perhaps less worthy of solidarity – since the word Charity is not considered politically correct – the fifty-year-old unemployed man who sleeps in his car, because the house to which he would be entitled after decades of contributions is destined for a Muslim family? The Lord commanded us to love the next, or the one who is closest to us: one who shares the same Faith, the same homeland, the same language. Which doesn't mean we don't have, as Christians, the duty to love even those who are far away; but the reason for this love must always be the commandment of Charity, which must be proportionate and can never contradict the Faith, being that and this essential attribute of God, which is supreme Love and supreme Truth.
«Lord Jesus, it is easy to wear the crucifix around your neck or hang it as an ornament on the walls of our beautiful cathedrals or our homes, but it is not as easy to meet and recognize the new crucifixes of today: the homeless, young people without hope, without work and without prospects, immigrants forced to live in shacks on the margins of our society, after having faced unprecedented suffering» (ibid., pag. 11).
The Crucifix is ​​not a «ornament on the walls of our beautiful cathedrals»: it is the symbol of the Sacrifice of the Son of God, scandal for the Jews and foolishness for the pagans. I «new crucifixes today» they do not intend to redeem anyone, perhaps not even themselves, and it is blasphemous to compare them to the One who sacrificed himself for them too. Not just blasphemous, but also specious, because it throws aundeniable human suffering to silence us, pointing us out as selfish and insensitive. Because it exploits other people's dramas not to encourage us to do good, but to blame us unduly, since none of us have any responsibility either in the slave trade, nor in their exploitation once they arrive in our country.

«Maria, at this moment you are experiencing the same drama as many mothers who suffer for their children who have left for other countries in the hope of finding opportunities for a better future for them and their families, but what, Unfortunately, they find humiliation, contempt, violence, indifference, loneliness and even death. Give them strength and courage» (ibid., pag. 19-20).
The Sorrowful Mother did not experience the drama of a departed son «in the hope of finding opportunities for a better future»: She was pierced in Her Immaculate Heart seeing the ingratitude of her people, the hatred of the wicked, the unprecedented violence of the executioners, the perfidy of the Sanhedrin. For the sins of his nation. While those who leave their country do so because Europe appears to them like a mirage, a promised land, only to end up a victim of crime or fanaticism. Because they are not given the opportunity to live with dignity in their homeland, where poverty is desired by those who only want to exploit its resources, counting on the complicity of corrupt politicians and fomenting tribal wars? Why don't you ask the African prelates what lies?, what deceptions are spread by the media mainstream, to the detriment of many unfortunate people who a prudent international intervention could help to recover? Because we don't remember anything other than wars, poverty, lInjustice is the cause of sin, and that only the conversion of individuals and nations to the sweet yoke of Christ is the only way to foster harmony and peace between peoples?
And again: given that the Way of the Cross it has become an opportunity for social and political reclamation, because you don't have the courage to say with open words that multinationals and global finance have made a deliberate decision to exploit some areas of the planet, forcing their inhabitants into forced migrations? Why don't we denounce this infernal plan, which on the one hand causes poverty and on the other exploits it to undermine the remnants of the Catholic civilization of Europe?
«The poor, the foreigner, those who are different must not be seen as an enemy to be rejected or fought but, rather, like a brother or sister to welcome and help. They are not a problem, but rather a precious resource for our armored citadels where well-being and consumption do not alleviate the growing tiredness and fatigue» (ibid. pag. 35).
Pure Bergoglian rhetoric, devoid of any foundation, indeed disavowed daily by the exponential increase in crimes committed by foreigners: murders, robberies, thefts, rapes, violence, cracks, prostitution, organ trafficking. Wellbeing and consumption are the result of a corrupt society, who has denied his glorious Christian heritage; and tiredness is the result of a drip of overused words, behind which lies the greed of those who profit from human trafficking – also with the business of reception – or the desire to disfigure our society, its culture, its traditions, in hatred of God.
«Gentleman, teach us to have your gaze. That look of welcome and mercy with which you see our limits and our fears. Help us to look at divergences of ideas in this way, habits, views. Help us to recognize ourselves as part of the same humanity and to become promoters of bold and new paths of welcoming those who are different, to create communities together, family, parishes and civil society» (ibid. pag. 36).
What imprint! On the one hand, the defeatist attitude of those who emasculate themselves with their own hands in the name of hospitality, of ecumenism, of dialogue; on the other, the invader's persuasion to conquer Christian Europe through demographic and democratic means, demolishing our churches with the cry of God bless you, building in their place – with the applause of apostate clerics – mosques and Koranic schools. This ideological castration, sponsored by the conciliar sect and by Freemasonry, cry out for vengeance to Heaven, because it presents betrayal as a good thing, praises fearlessness as a virtue, hypocritically erases the inextinguishable struggle between light and darkness, fraudulently defines «differences of ideas, habits, views» the irreconcilable abyss between the only Revelation of the True God and the idolatrous superstitions of the pagans. A horizontal vision that erases all transcendence while despising thethe work of the Redemption and denying the very mission of the Church.
«While walls and barriers are going up around the world, we want to remember and thank those with different roles, in these last months, they risked their own lives, particularly in the Mediterranean Sea, to save that of many families in search of security and opportunities. Human beings fleeing poverty, dictatorships, corruption, slavery» (ibid., pag. 43).
These words are so cloying in their courtliness as to be grotesque: they sound so forced as to take away that residue of credibility that, with titanic effort, one could agree with Sister Eugenia's ravings, calamus Bergollei. While he was there, could have mentioned Casarini or one of the so-called humanitarian associations that infest the Mediterranean hunting for presumed shipwrecked people to meet on the open sea and ferry them not to the nearest port, but in the one in which the immigrationist ideology has managed to make inroads: «…how many are dying today in too many ordeals around the world, including concentration camps similar to concentration camps in transit countries, ships that are refused safe port, the long bureaucratic negotiations for the final destination, the centers of permanence» (ibid., pag. 51), Obviously "while governments discuss, locked in the halls of power» (ibid., pag. 59).
Marxist demands which, from the mouth of a religious woman, give an idea of ​​the abyss of ignorance and ideology to which the entire Catholic community has been and still is subjected for fifty years, and especially under this unfortunate Pontificate.
«Gentleman, make us understand that we are all children of the same Father. May the death of your Son Jesus give the Heads of Nations and those responsible for legislation the awareness of their role in defense of every person created in your image and likeness» (pag. 59 – 60).
We are not everyone children of the same Father: they have the right to call themselves adopted children of God only those who welcomed His Only Begotten Son (Gv I, 12): to those who believe in his name, which do not give blood, nor from a desire for meat, nor by the will of man, but they were begotten by God (Gv I, 12).
It's difficult, in the face of Bergoglian propaganda imbued with beggar solidarity, believe that the conciliar sect is among those who welcomed the Son of God: they prefer man to God, the creature to the Creator. The followers of this counterchurch managed to deny Christ on the Cross precisely during the Way of the Cross, on Good Friday, in the place where the Christian martyrs voluntarily testified to their faith by suffering atrocious torments until their death.

source – https://opportuneimportune.blogspot.com/2019/04/una-via-crucis-in-cui-cristo-e-solo-il.html

Share

2 Responses

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *