Syria, Franco-American manipulation
For our French-speaking friends and readers, besides of course, for all those who know the language:
Syria 1957: False Flag and history repeating itself
Reporting of Federici Studies Center
SYRIA: THE PRECEDENT
It's the 1957; American President Eisenhower and British Prime Minister Mcmillan decide that the time has come for "regime change" in Syria.
Shukri al-Quwatli the Syrian president who won the first democratic elections, the hero of independence was no longer reliable; it was getting too close to the Soviet Union and Washington and London could not risk losing control of Syrian oil, nor that Syria would become a communist stronghold in the Middle East.
And so the CIA and SIS were brought into play to study the best solution. And she was found: unleash a series of terrorist attacks in Damascus by pretending there was an ongoing revolt; carry out some targeted assassinations on the most influential figures in the government and a series of provocations at the Turkish borders, Iraqi and Jordanian forces that would push those nations to intervene.
CIA and SIS should have used “their capabilities in both the psychological and action fields”.
Among the Syrian government men to be killed, the first was Afif al-Bizri the Chief of Staff accused of being a man from Moscow.
The plan for "regime change" included funding for a "Free Syrian Committee" and weapons for "paramilitary political factions"; the forerunners of the current "Moderate Rebels".
The operation, now approved and executive, it ran aground due to Iraq and Jordan's refusal to launch a disastrous war in the Middle East.
The story of the attempted coup in Syria emerged a few years ago from the private documents of Duncan Sandys, Defense Secretary to the British Prime Minister and published by the Guardian.
The similarity with what is happening today is striking; but ultimately there is nothing new either in Syria or elsewhere.
Having a government or not doesn't change the situation, we are still occupied by the Americans
Of Massimo Fini
Source: lospecialegiornale
Syria in chaos, speak to The Special the journalist, writer and historian Massimo Fini, always a supporter of the right to self-determination of peoples and very attentive to the dynamics in the Arab world. There is a war of threats between Russia and America, amid Trump tweets announcing imminent attacks against the Russians, and Moscow accusing America of wanting to disappear the evidence that would exonerate Assad from the accusation of having launched the chemical attack on Duma. But what are Trump's real intentions? He really wants to start a war with devastating results, or in the end it will be limited as has already happened in the past, to hit secondary targets without touching Russian bases?
Finish, where are we at?? War will break out between Russians and Americans in Syria with the probable involvement of China and Iran to protect Assad and with France and Great Britain alongside the USA?
“I don't think the United States and Russia will come to a head-on collision, as has always happened, they will wage war through third parties. Trump is interested in having good relations with Putin and a war is not in his favor. The real problem in the Middle East is represented by Israel which attacks and bombs without any rules. I am sure that if World War III breaks out it will only be the fault of the Israelis. The Gaza story is terrifying. They shoot at the population and refuse international inspections". Read More
The hypocrisy of chemical weapons
Of Robert Fish
Source: Comedonchisciotte
The hypocrisy of it all. These ignoble intentions. The carelessness. The shameful lies and excuses.
I'm not talking about the US president with hasty and impulsive tweets and his desires to escape police raids on his lawyer's office - obviously there is a connection with Russia.
And I'm not talking about his latest scandal. It's possible that life with Melania isn't going swimmingly at the moment. Better to talk about this than to sit with generals and ex-generals and seriously discuss Russia and Syria.
I'm not talking about Theresa May, who wants to avoid the Brexit discussion through every type of distraction possible: the Salisbury attacks, Douma -also Trump. So when the poor lady thought she had gotten the consent of the US President, Trump called Macron. What is all this nonsense? Read More
Macron is leading us to massacre to enrich France
Of Mario Mauro
Source: The Subsidiary
“The international community should take advantage of what the Syrian Christian communities express, who without being supporters of Assad, asked to choose between him and ISIS they chose the Syrian president”: so says former defense minister Mario Mauro in this interview with ilsussidiario.net. In Syria there is a conflict between regional powers, there has never been a civil war, he said again, “in which half the world ended up. France in particular is dragging us into a war that has its interests as its sole purpose, within the framework of a neocolonialist policy that has been going on for years”. Trump? “It moves only for internal political interests”.
Macron says he has evidence of Assad's use of chemical weapons: what game is he playing? What is his policy?
For years now, on the international scene, Paris but also London have been playing roles that I would define as neocolonialist, which go far beyond the shared design of the EU. On the contrary, the role they tend to embody constitutes an obstacle to a common European foreign policy, and it also represents a serious problem for a European defense policy because it conceives them only as a reflection of the strategies of these two nations.
Macron come Sarkozy?
Yes, his position seems to be a reflection of that of Sarkozy and therefore ultimately leads us to a very harsh judgment on the scenario of international interventions in recent years 25 years. Read More
The attack in Syria? A useful comedy to avoid the worst
Report Linkiesta
The attack in Syria? A useful comedy to avoid the worst
Despite the discussed and questionable attack, the Third World War did not begin. Trump takes home intact (more or less) the honor. The Russians too. And even Assad emerges legitimized by the US "strike"., England and France. (Of Tommaso Canetta, LAWS)
"Siria, there were no chemical weapons" The hidden truth behind the attacks
Catastrophists, the millenarian, apocalitticomani, conspiracy theorists at any cost are disappointed this time too, as we expected. No World War III in the short term because it is nobody's interest. The strategies are different.(n.d.r.)
“Syria, there were no chemical weapons” The hidden truth behind the attacks – The eyes of war
76 of the 105 cruise missiles launched by the US, Great Britain and France against Syria on the night of 14 April, they hit the Barzah Research Center in Damascus. They were “precise, overwhelming and effective” as Kenneth Mc Kenzie stated, Director of the Joint Chief Staff of the US General Staff in the very detailed conference ...
CONTINUE ON:
http://www.occhidellaguerra.it/siria-non-cerano-armi-chimiche-la-verita-nascosta-dietro-gli-attacchi/ Read More
Lombardy: Fontana sceglie "No al Gay pride, yes to Family day"
No patronage at Gay Pride, it is a divisive demonstration and therefore should not be supported".
Governor Attilio Fontana does not intend to grant the regional logo to the rainbow parade scheduled for 30 June in Milan, he confirmed this in an interview published yesterday by the Lettera43 website.
It is the line that he also followed in Varese, where he was mayor for two terms. «I am heterosexual, but it's not like I'm making a demonstration to accredit my heterosexuality. Choices in this field must remain personal, flaunting them is wrong. Gay Pride is divisive and when demonstrations are divisive they should never be supported". Instead, it intends to confirm the choice of former president Roberto Maroni who on the eve of the march against the law on civil unions (the Cirinnà bill) In the 2016 lit up the Pirellone with the words «Family Day». Read More
Il "gran rifiuto" of Assad to the USA in 2009 fu l'inizio di tutti i suoi guai…
The American decision to begin a campaign against Syrian President Bashar al Assad did not begin, as you believe, in 2011but in 2009.
CONTINUE ON:
http://www.secoloditalia.it/2018/04/il-gran-rifiuto-di-assad-agli-usa-nel-2009-fu-linizio-di-tutti-i-suoi-guai/
Ecco perché l'Italia dovrebbe sostenere la Siria di Assad
Of Eugenio Palazzini
Syria does not concern us, let the Americans and Russians deal with it. We have many other problems to solve and in any case who do you want to consult Italy, we have no say in the matter. And then let's be clear, why should we meddle in the affairs of an Arab nation, at most, let's limit ourselves to offering our support to the United States, indeed no to Putin's Russia. Let's do this, Let's just avoid exposing ourselves, it's better. This is a recurring litany, worthy of the best fatalistic and disenchanted spirit of the times. At the same time, however, it is the most obtuse and senseless vision of the Syrian issue. There are in fact at least four fundamental reasons why it is not acceptable for Italy to stand by and watch, which actually impose on us a clear stance in support of Assad's Syria. Here are the ones. Read More