Tintin, the Devil and the Good Lord

We thank the French friends of this article, interesting and understandable, ironic and suitable for everyone
Bob Garcia, passionate about popular literature, music and comics, is the author of several detective novels and short stories, but also tintinophile studies.
With this new essay, he attempts to measure the place of God in the work of Georges Remi, said Hergé. The Belgian designer comes from a Catholic background and his work reflects this..
On first reading, the character of Tintin is a model of life. He shows kindness, of generosity and compassion on all occasions, he fights against evil, defend the weak, and remain faithful in friendship. Under the influence of his mentor and editor, l'abbé Norbert Wallez, his first Tintin albums (Tintin among the Soviets et Tintin in the Congo) clearly express their Catholic beliefs.
The book reminds us that Franco-Belgian comics from the interwar period are overwhelmingly influenced by Catholicism.. It is all the more natural since it was the Catholic press which was behind the launch of comics in Belgium.. It is notably Father Wallez, press director, who hires Georges Remi, confided to him 1927 the direction of the youth supplement The Little Twentieth and encourages him to create the character of Tintin reporter. And it is this Tintin character who will inspire other cartoonists, like Joseph Gillain, said Jijé, future pillar of the newspaper Spirou. Bob Garcia also recalls the links that, in Belgium, united scouting with Catholicism at the time. And these cartoonists first began to illustrate the publications of their scout unit.
Bob Garcia's book therefore examines the different albums of Hergé, describes what he considers to be religious influences.
The clearest is the list he draws up of covers of the Little Twentieth a you Journal Tintin dedicated to Catholic themes, whether it is the Nativity, the wise men, Saint Nicholas, etc. The same goes for the Christmas greeting cards illustrated by Hergé. Faith is omnipresent. Read More

Share

A democracy of traitors?

Of Mario Bozzi Trails
A democracy of traitors?
Source: Mario Bozzi Trails
In the lexicon of the electoral campaign 2018 let's try to "synthesize", this time, the word "betrayal". The term often comes up in interviews with various party leaders , a sign that the issue is on the surface.
What does “betray” mean ? How much and how one betrays oneself ? And who truly betrays their country or community ? These are some of the questions that Avishai Margalit asks, in his latest essay “On Betrayal” (Einaudi).
The concept of what it means to betray is constant across centuries and cultures. Betrayal undermines the most solid trust, it dissolves the glue that holds our strongest relationships together, questioning ethics: of what we owe to the people and groups who provide us with a sense of belonging.
To come to the Italian case, in a time in which politics seems to be characterized by a low tension of values, talking about "traitors" and "betrayals" then offers the opportunity, beyond any moralism, for a non-trivial reconsideration on the issues of political identity, of representation, of the relationship between elected officials and voters, going to the heart of our democratic system, not surprisingly in a strong crisis. Read More

Share

The enemy has arrived, and we ourselves let him in

Of Francesco Lamendola
The enemy has arrived, and we ourselves let him in
Source: New Italy Academy
The enemy has arrived: we knew it was coming, sooner or later; o, at least, all the generations that preceded us knew it: only ours seems to have forgotten a very simple truth: that those who do not love themselves and are not willing to fight to defend what they are and what they possess, or at least what he received as an inheritance from his fathers, summons the forces that will sweep him away: and so she allowed herself to be completely surprised. The guards were asleep; some have opened the doors to the invader: partly because they mistook him for a friend, partly because they had already decided to betray the city and abandon it into the hands of the first comer, such is the hatred that they have allowed to grow in their hearts towards the one who was the mother of all, and that, for better or for worse, it made us what we are now, while without her we would now be nothing, numbers, livestock. These, these traitors, they don't really love the enemy, how much they detest their fellow citizens and everything that their civilization represents: just to see one destroyed and the other razed to the ground, they would have been quick to throw open the doors to anyone, even to the most barbaric and cruel occupant.
To properly prepare the soil, this race of traitors has sown, for years, for decades, the poison of a false philanthropism and an even more false humanitarianism; so much so that by dint of beating and replying, one lie after another, one year after another, gradually conquering the entire information establishment, the scholastic one and the pseudo cultural one, we have reached the point of having contracted the deadly disease of self-racism: reverse racism, that we turn against ourselves. Read More

Share

No freedom for dissidents

Of Alessio Mannino
No freedom for dissidents
Source: The dissident intellectual
The coldest of all monsters, Nietzsche said of the State - and he didn't know what the Market would be... The last person to want to put handcuffs on freedom of expression is the Poland governed by the Catholic-nationalist right: It is forbidden to claim that the Nazi extermination camps were Polishi. Put it like this, he would seem like a fool trying to abolish something stupid by decree: the concentration camps were undoubtedly German, to define them in any other way would simply be false or inaccurate. But unless you're under oath in a trial, punish those who declare falsely with prison (Now it's fashionable to call them fake news), it is trying to cage the least cageable, compressible and repressible there is: the thought.
Even if it were an unfounded and clearly idiotic thought. Dice: but how naive, Power has been trying to deny it since the dawn of time, often or almost regularly succeeding, the circulation of unwelcome facts and ideas. Certainly. And if he doesn't proclaim himself democratic, there would be no problem: in dictatorship, under an absolute monarch or with the Inquisition reigning, we knew that certain things could be thought but not said, but at least you were dealing with a hateful oppressor yes, but consistent with its principles. But if, like in Warsaw, we are happy to consider ourselves democratic, then any form of censorship becomes inadmissible. Read More

Share

The anti-fascist march in Macerata? Disgusting

Of Nicola Porro

https://www.nicolaporro.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/marcia-antifascista.jpg

D-i-s-g-u-s-t-o-s-i. This is how I define the chants and banners of the anti-fascist demonstration in Macerata. You will understand the reasons better by seeing this short video in which, in bright tones, I'm talking about the choir "from Trieste downwards" (02:00), of the foibe (03:01) and the horror perpetrated by Nigerians. Continue reading Macerata, those statements and that business that… On the facts…

CONTINUE ON: https://www.nicolaporro.it/la-marcia-antifascista-macerata-disgustosa/ Read More

Share

The smoke of 4 March promises to be dark

Of Giulietto Chiesa
Less than a month after the vote 4 March it is now clear that these next political elections will produce a parliament, however illegal, but they will not produce a government. There will not be a majority to lead the country.
Everyone says it: Berlusconi says so, Renzi says it, the big media commentators hypothesize it. A null political result is emerging. Who doesn't say it, for tactical reasons, he thinks so. Nobody is sure of a majority, let alone an assignment.
Polls are increasingly less credible, while a good third of the electorate says they are against going to vote. In reality, many more than a third will not vote, as a sign of protest against the political class that, in these last few weeks, is showing signs of real chaos, among rocks of bombastic promises of change that no one believes.

Matteo Renzi e Barack Obama
© AP PHOTO/ J. DAVID IS

But the perception of the state of things is now general. The right - which claims to have an advantage in consensus - is not at all sure of its position. Looms over the right-wing alliance “four-legged” around Berlusconi (for now not a candidate for prime minister) the threat of a rapid split between Forza Italia and Salvini's League. Which, despite the alliance, he presents himself in all television debates with very different positions from those of Berlusconi. Not neglecting to say, every three words, That, if he will take “just one more vote”, he will be the head of government. An alliance, so, which could end up in first place (but certainly without a parliamentary majority), but find themselves split immediately after the vote. And the worries don't end there. How to govern yourself (if this were the outcome)? With this question the headaches become excruciating. Everyone knows that the starting hypothesis was something new “pact of the Nazarene” between Forza Italia and Matteo Renzi, head of the Democratic Party. But now? Once again the polls show the PD in free fall. An alliance with Berlusconi alone would not have the numbers. With Berlusconi plus Salvini he would have neither the numbers nor any decency. For too great divergences of intentions on topics such as Europe and the economy. The uncertainty of the new coalition weighs heavily on the left of the PD “Free and United” (LEU), product of the split in Renzi's party. How many votes will it take away from him? Nobody can predict it, but it will be a hemorrhage of at least 5%. Deadly for the new Renzi-Berlusconi pact. E, in any case, LEU declares its total unavailability for an agreement with the right and, therefore she will not carry water to Renzi, who he just slammed the door in his face.

Everyone, Then, fearing the judgment of the voters, they say they don't want to “mess up”, that is, they exclude alliances to which, actually, everyone thinks. And then? No majority emerges no matter which way you look at the mosaic. The M5S, for his part, he repeats that he will not make alliances with anyone. If he finished first, so, he would be alone. And then? At that time, in case of assignment (Surely”reckless”) That, in that case, the President of the Republic, could entrust him, he would go to Parliament waving his program and asking “convergences” in all directions. Being evident that no one “will converge”. although the M5S gives the impression of wanting to propose a government “anesthetized” to get out of an equally opposition “anesthetized”. But it is clear that “he doesn't want to win”, Why, if he won, he should immediately acknowledge that he does not have a majority. Someone puts forward the hypothesis, really adventurous, of an alliance between the League, — who abandons Berlusconi — and the Movement 5 position. Ma, apart from the numbers, which should become very different from what is expected, and which make such a government majority very hypothetical, there is the destiny of both. Such an alliance, taking into account the great differences in the composition of the electoral body of the two parties, it could negatively mark the fate of both. Too risky for both Salvini and Di Maio. And then it is evident that such an alliance (o “convergence”, as Di Maio says) It would last a few weeks at most. And then it would be all over again.

LEU more 5 position? Unless there's a fantastic exploit (that no one now foresees) of both, the majority isn't even there in a dream. Other outsiders are not visible on the horizon, also because the media does not want troublemakers who stir up the waters of this swamp. And therefore they only let those who are already in Parliament speak. The cacophony is already at its peak even without the disruptors of the out-of-tune choir. How do we get out of it? Returning to the polls in October. That is the 4 March will be just a stage. We will therefore need a transitional government. Everyone is thinking of Gentiloni and we can swear that President Mattarella is thinking of him too. But before we get to the new elections in October, a new electoral law will be needed. The current one is clearly unconstitutional and everyone knows it. How to do it? For now, no one thinks about it: the current headaches are more than enough. Nervousness increases. Many interpret the Macerata shooting, — where an avowed fascist tried to shoot dead several black immigrants — as a stark sign of worsening social tension. Which is now a sum of tensions: from that of immigrants, to the economic one, to that of unemployment and widespread poverty, in addition to the absence of new jobs. And the deluge of promises produces intolerance and protest.
The author's opinion may not coincide with the position of the editorial staff.

Read More

Share

Vladimir Putin is deeply corrupt or “incorruptible” ?

Of Sharon Tennison
Vladimir Putin is deeply corrupt or “incorruptible” ?
Source: Comedonchisciotte
While the situation in Ukraine is worsening, A mountain of disinformation is being poured on Russia and Putin. Journalists and pundits must scour the thesaurus to come up with elaborate new epithets to describe them both. Every time I give a presentation in America, the first question that is menacingly asked to me during Qs&A is always: “What about Putin?”. Time to share my thoughts on this:
Putin obviously has his flaws and is not free from mistakes. Based on my previous experience with him, and those of trusted people, including US officials who worked closely with him over a period of years, Putin is most likely a righteous man, reliable and exceptionally creative.
He is obviously a long-term thinker and planner, and has proven to be an excellent analyst and strategist. He is a leader who can confidently achieve his goals despite the mountains of false accusations hurled at him since he became Russia's second president.
I saw his demonization grow, since it started in the early years 2000 – I wrote down my thoughts and concerns, hoping to then include them in a book (published in 2011). The book explains my observations in more depth than this article. Read More

Share

Adrift

Of Marco Cedolin
Adrift
Source: The corrosive
All the significant struggles carried out have long been abandoned (too often without the help of good faith) over the last half century, from the workers' battles of the years 70/80, to the anti-globalization of the end of the years 90, to environmentalist or pseudo-environmental causes (No TAB, No Dal Molin, No Mose, No Muos) of the first decade of the new century, the so-called antagonistic left (probably only about herself) he now finds himself in disarray, incapable of presenting itself with a minimum of credibility in the hell of globalization to which it itself contributed…..
Without having any more strong arguments through which to bring together the new generations, without an antagonistic spirit that goes beyond the stone-throwing agreed with the police or “from the epic” contended with a shop window, now orphaned of any ideology, the “left antagonist” having now become globalist and globalist, today it finds itself increasingly adrift, devoid of any point of reference and functional only to the interests of that elite who pretended to fight for fifty years.
The only arguments “strong” to which Che Guevara's orphans now try to anchor themselves, of red flags and an insincere anti-Global spirit, they are an anti-historical anti-fascism in the absence of fascism and the all-out defense of human trafficking perpetrated by the globalizing policy of an elite that pursues colonization and social dumping. All seasoned with the desire to prevent the free expression of thought to anyone who dares to express ideas and positions different from theirs. (branded as a fascist par excellence) and with a visceral hatred towards their country and the flag that represents it. Read More

Share

Book-complaint by an anthropologist: Political correctness kills freedom

Of Lisa Turri
Book-complaint by an anthropologist: Political correctness kills freedom
Source: Century of Italy
In civilized and advanced Sweden, if you say that integration policies have been a failure, you are branded a racist and fascist. It happened in 1997 to the wife of the American anthropologist Jonathan Friedman who drew inspiration from it for an essay of his that will cause discussion, Politically correct. Moral conformism as a regime (Meltemi), now available in Italian. Friedman teaches at Lund University and, like his wife before him, he is in turn considered a dangerous reactionary.
Interviewed by Elisabetta Rosaspina for The Reading, the cultural insert of Evening courier, Friedman observed: "I know, they accuse me of being a fascist. I can assure you that this is absolutely not the case: on the contrary. But this confirms the basic thesis of my book: political correctness emerges in historical periods of great sensitivity, when transformations of society are underway according to the plans of some elites, like the bourgeois left, unsure of their own positions". Friedman denounces the fact that precisely in the academic world the situation is becoming unsustainable, and cites the case of a Harvard professor accused of sexism in the 1990s for having quoted a line from the poem in his textbook Don Juan in Byron. In the end the risk is to censor the research because "if you want to be politically correct you end up imposing limits on the questions". Read More

Share
1 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28