The violent and the ambiguous words

27 February 2018 by admin

Report Arianna Publishing
Of Ernesto Galli Della Loggia – 25/02/2018
The violent and the ambiguous words
Source: Corriere della Sera
«We condemn any violence and from any source. However, we cannot help but remember that Italy is a Republic founded on anti-fascism, that our Constitution is anti-fascist". These are roughly the words of many exponents of the left wing commenting on the very serious accidents in Turin and in general on what is happening in many places in Italy. Words that precisely revolve around a formula that is felt and resented these days: ours is an anti-fascist Constitution.
He's fine. As it happens, however, history - history, I repeat, and not our personal opinions - should make us ask: anti-fascist yes, but of what anti-fascism? As anyone who has read any book knows, history records many events that cannot fail to pose some content problems when the term anti-fascism is used. They were certainly anti-fascists, for example, those who in Spain burned down churches and shot priests, anarchists and Trotskyists. They were anti-fascists who in 1939 they thought that the Soviet Union had done very well to annex the Baltic countries and half of Poland after reaching an agreement with Hitler, as were those who on our eastern border from '43 to '45 threw a few thousand Italians into the sinkholes.
Anti-fascists and moreover partisans were also those from whose association (the Empire), not sharing the underlying ideas, first the Catholic partisans broke away and then the shareholders led by Parri in 1948-49. Still: Eighteen-carat anti-fascists were also those who in the 1950s did not hesitate to define the United States as "Nazi" while not reserving a single word of solidarity, not even one, to Czechoslovakian or Hungarian anti-fascists, only a few years earlier their comrades in the Resistance and now sent to the gallows with the most unlikely and defamatory accusations by the communist regimes established in their countries. And the terrorists of the Red Brigades and other similar organizations have not always proclaimed themselves anti-fascists - in fact, they say, of the most "coherent" anti-fascism.? Read More

Policy | Non-fiction

The trap of “opposite extremisms”: distracting not to mention reality

26 February 2018 by admin

DISTRACT FROM THE REAL PROBLEMS OF THE COUNTRY WITH THE FARCE OF THE “OPPOSITE EXTREMISM” WHICH THEY THEN SEE WIDELY MORE’ “OPERATIONAL” SOCIAL CENTERS, IN THE GAME MIRROR OF THE POLITICAL INTERESTS OF THE LEFT (N.D.R.)

Of Enrico Galoppini
The trap of “opposite extremisms”
Source: The Discrimination
Who could be so stupid as to believe that in 2018, in this Italy massacred for over twenty-five years by Euro-liberal diktats, sold off worse than at the sales, occupied by over one hundred US and NATO bases, and subjected to a "character washing" made of immigrationism and genderism, the danger for the famous “common people” (the one who doesn't fight, he doesn't expose himself, she doesn't think and that she would just like to stay calm) may arise from these “OPPOSITE EXTREMISM”?
Of course only an asshole can believe that, or those who have every interest in uniting as many people as possible around the "reassuring power" can pretend to believe it.
But as far as I'm concerned, Lorsignori's little game is more exposed than ever, as well as worn out and stale. They want young Italians to kill themselves by hating each other without any purpose, but remember that when someone dies, the "moral instigators" will be all those who, amidst this circus of declarations, positions and petitions of principle, they have done nothing to open our eyes to who really pulls the strings of this kind of operations aimed at diverting attention from the classic false problem, and indeed they did everything to rekindle hatreds with an anachronistic flavour. Read More

Policy | Non-fiction

Gentiloni and the next Italian coup

26 February 2018 by admin

Of Antonio Serena

Gentiloni and the next Italian coup
«Italy will have a stable government, the center-left coalition will be the pillar of this government and there is no risk of populist or anti-European governments". This was said by Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni at the end of the meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in which the Italian votes on the 4 March. And he added: «The government solutions don't come from the polls, the voters will give her the 4 March. My opinion is that the only possible pillar of a stable and pro-European coalition can be the centre-left coalition.... However, I believe that Italy will have a stable government not characterized by anti-European positions".
In short, at the same time as pollsters (Supermedia developed by YouTrend for Agi), just over two weeks before the vote, they give the center-right coalition to 36,7% and close to reaching an absolute majority of seats, the M5s al 28% and the Democratic Party only to 22,8%., Gentiloni announces that the country will almost certainly have a centre-left government.
At this point all that remains is to send Piepoli and colleagues home (even if the polls' margins of error are now minimal), clear the seats and form yet another puppet government suggested by Brussels. It's not a very unlikely hypothesis, since the person saying these things is not just a post-communist who must have had something Stalinist in his brain, but above all the head of the last of four governments (Monti, Letta Renzi and Gentiloni) lowered from above, that is, devoid of any popular legitimacy to govern as the Constitution indicates when it states (art. 1) that Italy is a Republic, based on work (co.1) and that (co.2) sovereignty belongs to the people who exercise it in the forms and limits of the Constitution.
Gentiloni's words are very serious as they continue to vilify the sovereignty of the Italian people. If in fact his words are true, the next consultations will be useless as in Brussels they have already decided what government to give to Italy, implementing yet another coup with the appointment of a government that will be the expression of something different from what the Italians will have established with their vote. That, at this point, as always, it matters little or nothing, just as the citizens' indications in the various referendums on the legal responsibility of magistrates counted for nothing, on the abolition of the Ministry of Agriculture or on public financing of parties, all ignored or misrepresented.
At this point the Italians will have to resign themselves: to retire ad 80 years, to have the 40% percent of unemployed young people, not being able to decide about their future, to welcome millions more "migrants" in exchange for the benevolent approval of European bankers on our public accounts, to passively suffer any form of imposition.
And all this despite the fact that the elections taking place in various European countries confirm the citizens' desire to break away from the Europe of the bankers and its failed policies.
This being the case, Italian citizens, il 4 March, they can easily desert the voting booths by opting for a trip out of town. At present, getting rid of this little theater of dwarves and dancers appears to be an impossible mission.

Policy | Non-fiction

Io Gengis Khan vote

26 February 2018 by admin

Of Marcello Veneziani
Io Gengis Khan vote
Source: Marcello Veneziani
I know who will win the elections. He already has victory in his pocket, at the table. I would almost say imposed by electoral law. He will win more than he has won in previous years, recording ever-increasing numbers.
It's a post-election victory, a victory based on the free translation of the vote received. I'm talking about the ancient and renowned PT, which is a floating sub-parliamentary snake. The Transformist Party.
I've lost count of those who have done the quail leap and then even replicated it in reverse directions. I see many precursors, too many and too well known.
Their colorful testimonial is the legendary Razzi, who however is the least transformative of all and the nicest devotee of Kazzimiei. Read More

Culture | Non-fiction

Cato: The Roman wisdom of living, virtue, il lavoro e l'equilibrio

20 February 2018 by admin

Of Daniele Palmieri
Cato: The Roman wisdom of living
Source: Ink black

Farmer, politico, soldier, literary; it is not easy to define Cato under the wing of a single category.

Of rustic origins, himself the son of farmers, Cato liked to call himself a “a new man”, that is, a man who had built his fortune from nothing exclusively with work and virtue.

Known to most either as a staunch opponent of Carthage or as one of the founders of Latin literature, Cato was a multifaceted figure, not free from limitations, defects and contradictions, but towards whom it is difficult not to feel a form of reverential respect.

Thinkers like Cicero were enchanted by it, Livy, Seneca, Plutarch, who elevated his incorruptible morality to an ideal model. His own progeny boasted noble descendants, including Cato known as the Uticense, Stoic philosopher and martyr for freedom in an attempt to stop the rise of Caesar.

Cato is therefore a figure with a thousand faces and there is nothing better than his writings to reconstruct the different facets of this varied personality.

The Roman wisdom of living collects its aphorisms, his most incisive memorable sentences and sayings, handed down and from the only complete work that has come down to us, he De Agricoultura, and from the fragments, direct or indirect, handed down by ancient authors. The text also contains the first Italian translation of Monostich of Cato, from the “golden rules” of good living handed down under the name of Cato, which had great diffusion in the Latin Middle Ages, precisely because of their ability to outline a simple morality, practical and incisive at the same time.

But why should one recover the thinking of this practical man, not at all inclined to philosophical speculation?

First of all, There is a reason why Cato's writings and thoughts were so successful in the ancient and medieval West. This is because, as previously mentioned, although it does not contain refined philosophical speculations, however, they testify to a practical wisdom of living, drawn from everyday experience, which is well suited to the ethical needs of everyday life.

Cato is one of the highest testimonies of Roman Wisdom, aimed at action rather than contemplation, but no less profound because the action itself becomes a way to experience and savor a form of divine knowledge, attainable only through work and the sweat of one's brow.

Policy | Non-fiction

A short story of seven infamous years

20 February 2018 by admin

Of Marcello Veneziani
A short story of seven infamous years
Source: Marcello Veneziani
In the midst of a depressing electoral skirmish, Let's look back to understand how we got to this point. Let's reconstruct the history of the last seven years.
In the beginning it was the end of Berlusconi. Knocked out of action by an internal and international coup, in the name of a magic word called spread, The most absurd seven-year period in our albeit anomalous history began for Italy.
Over the course of these seven years we have witnessed the suicide of the right, to the suicide of the left, to the unfortunate advent of the technicians, to the abnormal growth of anti-politics, to the death and resurrection of Berlusconi.
Right-wing suicide has a main name: Finish. The suicide of the left has a main name: Renzi. And two swarms of accomplices.
The failure of the technicians has the name of Monti (and maybe Fornero's face), the abnormal growth of anti-politics has Grillo's hair and Di Maio's face. And the void that remains, the vacant chair, has the name of Mattarella.
The collapse of politics mirrors the collapse of society; indeed it is the only point that connects the degradation of politics to the decadence of society. In the background there is the tragic overtaking of deaths over births, of the old over the young, plus the flight abroad of the smartest kids, replaced by the arrival of illegal immigrants. Mass society has become molecular, always connected and increasingly solitary, abitata da narcisi astiosi. Read More

Actuality | Non-fiction

L'ideologia dell'Identico

16 February 2018 by admin

Of Alain de Benoist

Source: The Rebel newspaper
What should we rebel against nowadays?? Faced with the rise of single thought, faced with the swelling of an extraordinary wave of what we do not hesitate to call planetary conformism, in the face of the various pathologies that afflict our societies, in the face of the various threats that weigh on them and that darken their future, you are spoiled for choice. However, it seems to me that most of these phenomena that we try to oppose have a common cause. That is, it seems to me that these phenomena reveal themselves as consequences of a very specific ideology, secular and multifaceted, which I propose to call “the ideology of the Identical”. The ideology of the Identical is an ideology that develops starting from what is common in all men. More precisely, it develops by taking into account only what men have in common and interpreting it as the Identical, and that means, in other words, that such an ideology can only aspire to leveling out. The Ideology of the Identical often refers to equality, but to a purely abstract equality: in the absence of a precise criterion that allows it to be concretely determined, equality is nothing else, Indeed, than a different name of the Identical. The ideology of the Identical therefore considers universal equality between men as an equality in itself, disconnected from any element of concreteness that would allow it to be ascertained. It is an ideology allergic to everything that specifies and characterizes singularity, which interprets every distinction as potentially derogatory, which considers contingent differences, transitory, inessential or secondary. Its driving force is the idea of Unico, which is what the Other cannot tolerate, and intends to reduce everything to unity: One God, unique civilization, unique thought. […] Read More

Actuality | Non-fiction

In our school we do not have disabled or foreign students

15 February 2018 by admin

Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team

Controversy erupts over this sentence from a principal of a Roman high school and Minister Fedeli threatens sanctions to force the school to be inclusive and multi-purpose

Of Costanza Miriano

(AUTOMATIC READING)
The collective hysteria of the very politically correct now means that if a principal, Clara Rech of the Visconti classical high school in Rome to give names and surnames, writes objective data in a self-evaluation document – “there are no foreign or disabled students” – damnatio breaks out in Repubblica, Minister Fedeli threatens measures because schools must be inclusive and multi-purpose.
Bene, I would like to say that the minister is right, the school must be inclusive, that is, giving everyone the same opportunities. The principle is sacrosanct, but let's ask ourselves what it means, in concreto. Inclusive for me means that anyone decides to study seriously, whatever country or social background he comes from, can have the same possibilities. It's a beautiful program, I would agree. This would really allow social mobility, currently impossible in Italy. If you are the son of a professional but you are a moron, if you are a goat and especially if you don't study, to get to the qualifying exam that will allow you to occupy the place prepared by your parents in their studio you must spend at least thirty-six years of study, that is, every year of the eighteenth year of your school career you have to repeat it. This, a school that fails and selects, it would be a truly inclusive school, where even the son of the Bangladeshi greengrocer can become a lawyer if he kills himself on books, while the lawyer's son who doesn't want to study can still find a place on the market; and now I too am accused of being classist, I imagine. Let's clarify: the greengrocer is a very noble job, but you don't need to study too much. Point. Read More

Policy | Non-fiction

Dust of 5 position

15 February 2018 by admin

by Paolo Becchi on Libero, 14/02/2018
That they were not Franciscans had been known to everyone for some time. That was just Gianroberto Casaleggio's ideal, that he actually led a Franciscan life: an old car, a very old cell phone, dress modestly, austere life. The grillini in parliament, Instead, they pretended to be, but they all took home an enviable salary. From what is emerging now, however, the problem is not that they were not Franciscans, but rather that they were downright dishonest.
Transfers made and then withdrawn to a fund, wanted by Casaleggio, for microcredit (fund intended to support small and medium-sized businesses): a colossal hole, still difficult to calculate. Estimates speak of 1,4 millions, and the Movement itself has admitted errors and incorrect and/or inflated calculations. In short, many transfers are fake, because they were published as reported by parliamentarians but immediately afterwards revoked. If this is the honesty that was supposed to come back into fashion...
In recent weeks, 250 thousand euros have been paid hastily (130 the parliamentarians 128 the Europeans, that they really don't earn). Five days ago the senator Carlo Martelli and the deputy Andrea Cecconi, both leaders "blocked" in the next elections, they were forced to leave, Senator Maurizio Buccarella in the meantime has self-suspended: «rimborsopoli» is overwhelming the entire Grillino parliamentary group. It remains to be clarified how and if David Borrelli's move to the mixed group in the European Parliament fits into this story, one of the three members of the Rousseau Association.
CONTINUE ON: https://paolobecchi.wordpress.com/2018/02/14/polvere-di-5-stelle/

Catholicism | Non-fiction

The interview with Rabbi Riccardo Di Segni

14 February 2018 by admin

Reporting of www.unavox.it
in don Curzio Nitoglia

Introduction

In light of what has been seen in thearticle in the Gospel of St. Matthew on reprobation (not definitive) of Israel we can read and comment on the interview with the chief rabbi of Rome, Riccardo di Segni, released to Aldo Cazzullo in the Corriere della Sera (21. I. 2018, p. 21).

The interview

When asked that the Jews blamed Italy for voting against the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the rabbi replies that it was done because such a vote "is a reflection of the typical Christian position […] whereby Jews can be subjugated or tolerated, more sovereign, not even at home" (1).
Regarding the anti-Semitism still existing in Italy, Di Segni says that "there is the religious idea according to which the Jewish people have exhausted their function and must wander wandering and dispersed among peoples as punishment for not having accepted the truth" (2).
He also recognizes that “Rabbinic Judaism derives from the Pharisees [of the time of Jesus, ndr]” (3), that “God is only one” (4), that “if you [Christians, ndr] you have Sunday it's because we have Saturday" (5).
Regarding ecumenism he has a very clear vision: “When Pope Francis came to the synagogue he wanted to discuss theology. I told him no: everyone has their own theology, and it doesn't change it". Excellent lesson: “When salt becomes tasteless it is only good to be thrown on the ground and trampled on by men” (Mt., V, 13).
He has much better ideas on migration than the "welcoming" ones of the catholic progressives: “I wonder: all Muslims who arrive here [in Italy, ndr] they intend to respect our rights and values? And the Italian state has the strength to enforce them? Unfortunately I have to answer with two no's. That's why I'm worried. […]. I know that uncontrolled migration can provoke a reaction of intolerance”.
On Jesus Christ he clearly answers that "for us he is not the Messiah" and this justifies the Catholic position of "friendly segregation" regarding Talmudic Judaism.
Furthermore, concludes the chief rabbi of Rome, “The afterlife is not at the center of my concerns”. Here we can see the influence of the theology of the Sadducees who already at the time of Jesus denied the immortality of the soul and the afterlife. Nihil sub sole novi.

Conclusion

We have seen the problem of Israel as the sole capital of the Jewish State and no longer a "separate body" or "internationalized city" when dealing with the interview given by Turkish President Erdogan to Maurizio Molinari.
It seems to me that the entire interview with the chief rabbi of Rome can be interpreted in light of this theory, which risks setting fire not only to the Middle East, already on fire, but the whole world given the interests that the USA on one side and Russia on the other have in this tormented region.
Therefore the solution to the problem posed by Di Segni is the one given to us by Saint Paul in the Epistle to the Romans (especially in chapter XI) and in the 1st Epistle to the Thessalonians (II, 15).
I refer the reader to the article oninterview Molinari-Erdogan to read what God revealed to us about Israel through Saint Paul.

NOTE
1 – Certainly yes, in fact, according to traditional Catholic theology this situation of subordinate separation is a consequence of deicide. Furthermore, speaking of Jerusalem as the "home" of the Jews, who left it burning in the 70 and they returned there by force of arms in 1948 driving out the Palestinians (Christians and Muslims) who had lived there for about 2000 years, it's questionable to say the least.
2 – Same as above.
3 – Absolutely true: the Pharisaism of Jesus' time is the father of current post-biblical Talmudic Judaism.
4 – This too is true, but the only true God is the SS. Trinity unacknowledged by post-biblical rabbinic Judaism, who put the Incarnate Word on the cross and perseveres in his misunderstanding.
5 – This is not accurate: in the Old Testament it was celebrated on Saturday because God rested on the sixth day after creation (on Saturday), while in the New Testament it is celebrated on Sunday because Christ, crucified on Friday by the Jews, he resurrected the following Sunday, that is, the Easter of Resurrection.

1 … 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 … 28