SILVANA DE MARI'S TRIAL CONCLUDED

«No triumphalism, but also no defeatism. However, the fundamental principle of freedom of expression has been safeguarded.". E’ the more than realistic position held by the lawyer Mauro Ronco who in yesterday's trial in Turin against Silvana De Mari commented on the court ruling that condemned the doctor for only one of the charges against her while acquitting her for all the others, including that interview with Zanzara which projected it among the most relevant media cases.
Basically, with the sentence of judge Eugenia Melania Cafiero, De Mari will have to pay a fine of 1.500 and a provisional of 2.500 euros to the Torino Pride Coordination and to Rete Lenford for having linked the activity of LGBT groups to the clearance of pedophilia. However, she was acquitted for all other charges.
E’ It is therefore wrong to claim victory as the newspapers of the LGBT cause did, but it would also be the case for those who supported Silvana De Mari's battle to cry out that the danger had been escaped because of a conviction, even if it relates to a specific fact, there was and it is on this that the defense will present its appeal.
«The moment I say that men who have sex with other men have greater risks of contracting diseases and tumors, it is documented. If this data were not there this would be a sacrosanct process", De Mari commented after the sentence, according to which "sexually transmitted diseases increase during pride". The Torino Pride coordination speaks of a historic ruling, while the doctor's defender, the lawyer Mauro Ronco, announces appeal.
But let's go in order. The doctor-writer's lawyer commented on the sentence with Nuova BQ.
Ronco lawyer, how things are? Who won?
No triumphalism or defeatism. Thank God, a judge was found who tried to dissect the problems and highlighted the serious criticism of homosexual behavior, recognizing that De Mari did not personally attack anyone.
Why then are there such mixed reactions?
Because this sentence needs to be framed. E’ a sentence that absolves De Mari from all statements concerning illnesses relating to homosexual people and from a certain point of view gives her a sort of recognition that there are no offended people and on the other hand they cannot be offended because she has not accused any person, he spoke as a doctor. On this front it is a great victory.
Because then the gay associations rejoice?
Because among the charges there was also a sentence supported by my client on her blog in which she said that the LGBT movement wants to muzzle freedom of expression and spread pedophilia. Well: on this sentence regarding the accusation made was considered defamatory of the LGBT movement. E’ however, the only charge for which she was convicted.
You can say you're happy?
No, because we are aiming for acquittal for this charge too. And we will support him in the appeal.
Come?
First, allow me to express appreciation for the judge's behavior. E’ it was very serious, has dissected the aspects that constitute freedom of thought from the aspects that, addressing a particular LGBT movement, could have repercussions on his public reputation. All in a highly polarized context such as this process has been. But De Mari came out with her head held high because her politically incorrect vision was recognised.
Let's go back to the appeal. In essence, only the accusation for defamation remains, not on diseases, but on the support for pedophilia by LGBT associations.
Exact. And on this we would have preferred a further step forward by the judge because we are faced with cultural and political criticism, not a scientific fact.
In what sense?
Historically in the American world, LGBT associations have been close to pedophilia, no, many contexts have changed, objections may be raised, but from a historical-philosophical point of view this can be stated.
How will you support it?
Saying that the LGBT acronyms must also accept criticism in a democratic confrontation and here the criticism is not that they favor pedophilia, but which were part of a global movement in which the tendencies towards the liberalization of pedophilia were strong. We will highlight the historical trend and I am confident that this will be recognized on appeal.
On what historical basis?
We have shown that the gay movement in the 1980s was associated with pedophilia, then they distanced themselves for utilitarian reasons. Today thirty years have passed and they hold a more balanced position. We accused them from a historical-philosophical perspective, but not legal.
However, the topic of pedophilia is also closely connected to the other proceedings against De Mari, the lawsuit in Rome by the Mario Mieli Club.
Here from a certain point of view it will be simpler because we have an advantage in the sense that the Mario Mieli Club refers precisely to Mario Mieli who predicts the promotion of pedophilia. E’ an accusation that concerns Mari Mieli specifically and not the LGBT movement tout court.
Let's go back to the acquittal: this summer at the start of its own trial at Nuova BQ he said that with this process three of the main fundamental freedoms of man were at stake: of expression, of scientific research and religion. E’ still like this?
Those three principles have been reiterated and we must be happy with this. And in some ways the sentence sets precise limits also in the possibility of exposing oneself and criticizing certain behaviors which, as we see, are also ideologically and politically exploited.
How much did the role played not only by LGBT networks, but also of De Mari who called together a world of supporters who supported her?
De Mari is a person who expresses herself freely in an acute and intelligent way, but it must not be exploited for neighborhood battles.
Note from BastaBugie: Silvana De Mari in the following article entitled “What defamation? It was a purely political process” explains that she was acquitted of all charges regarding offending people with homoerotic behavior. So, for example, it was not considered a crime by the court the interview published in La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana and relaunched by us.
Furthermore, De Mari was convicted for two statements on the LGBT movement. As can be clearly seen, his was a political process in all respects, not a banal defamation trial. An example? During the trial many people came to support her in the courtroom, but the public prosecutor stigmatized them and declared that he found them objectionable.
Here is the complete article published in La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana on 15 December 2018:
When I entered the field I knew it would be a marathon, not i 100 meters. The first episode of a long war is over. I only got away with conviction on two counts, and I earned a lot. My ideas are bouncing all over the place, and for the needs of the record, even newspapers not sympathetic to these ideas.
My ideas are exactly the same as those that the ex-gay and psychotherapist Richard Cohen reports on the first page of his beautiful book Riscoprirsi Normali, a book where among other things he explains that ex-gays are more numerous than gays.
– Nessuno nasce con un orientamento omosessuale
– Non esiste alcun dato scientifico a sostegno di una base genetica o biologica dell’attrazione verso individui dello stesso sesso.
– Nessuno sceglie di provare attrazione per individui dello stesso sesso.
– Tale attrazione è la conseguenza di traumi infantili irrisolti che conducono alla confusione dell’identità sessuale.
– Gli individui possono scegliere di cambiare e di passare da un orientamento omosessuale a un orientamento eterosessuale.
– L’attrazione per individui dello stesso sesso non è congenita.
– Ciò che si è imparato può essere disimparato.
– Quando le ferite vengono guarite e vengono colmati i bisogni insoddisfatti, si sperimenta l’identità sessuale e viene alla luce il desiderio eterosessuale.
– We are not faced with a good or bad thing, but to an affective disorder towards individuals of the same sex.
– There is nothing “gay” in the homosexual lifestyle; it is characterized by many disappointments and most often by an incessant search for love through codependent relationships.
– It's not a bad thing to feel attracted to individuals of the same sex, since this represents a stimulus to heal an unsatisfied need for love. However, acting on that desire causes frustration and suffering.
– We are faced with an affective disorder towards individuals of the same sex in which the individual does not recognize his own masculinity or femininity and desperately tries to fill the gap by joining someone of the same sex.
I was acquitted of all charges involving insulting people with homoerotic behavior. So now we know that we can say that the passive homoerotic male condition is burdened by a rate of sexually transmitted diseases twenty times higher than the rest of the population. (but in a study performed in New York City it is 140 times more)
We can say that sodomy, whether it is done against a man or a woman, it puts into circulation fecal bacteria that would have been better not to go off the main road Intestine, water closed, flush the toilet and go forever, and therefore it is unhygienic because fecal bacteria are the second cause of death due to infection, second only to respiratory infections, and plus there are viruses, including that of’ hepatitis A which has increased fivefold in the gay population in recent years.
We can prevent our children from being taught that anal eroticism is normal, and we can declare out loud that it disgusts us. We can say that homoerotic behavior is reversible.
Mine was through and through a political process, not a banal defamation trial. The municipality of Turin had formed a civil party, fortunately refused. During the trial many people came to support me: they faced the cold and long journeys. Their presence was beautiful and fundamental. They insisted on supporting me in every way, including selling my books. The prosecutor found this grossly disgraceful, and found it disgraceful that these people supported me, he found it disgraceful that “they were part of the Standing Sentinels or the Catholic Alliance. “. I don't know if there were Sentinels standing or belonging to the Catholic Alliance, I personally am not a member of either of these two movements, but that a prosecutor in a courtroom stigmatizes them, it is a sign of politicization.
I was convicted for two statements about the LGBT movement : the LGBT movement is hindering free speech, among other things I mentioned the “Decalogue” for the journalists that I reported in a previous article, and the relationships that the LGBT movement has with pedophile groups and I mentioned, among other things, the relationships between ILGA, the movement with which all LGBT groups and NAMBLA are affiliated, Nord America Men Boy Lovers Association (you can find everything on Google if you type these two acronyms), and the presence in Italy of a circle, financed with public money named after Mario Mieli: look up who this gentleman is on Wikipedia.
If I was convicted it means it's not true. It is not true that the LGBT movement wants to muzzle freedom of speech? Hurray! Therefore we can consider the absurd LGBT decalogue for journalists which muzzles the freedom of the press to be lapsed? It is not true that the LGBT movement does not distance itself from pedophilia? Hurray! So tomorrow all the LGBT movements in Italy will distance themselves from Mario Mieli and his book?
Definitely yes, because a sentence cannot be wrong.
In confident waiting.

source: http://www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=5455