The lie of “parent 1” and “parent 2” is so absurd that even children won't take long to expose it. The essential, but, is that, already at preschool age, in the family they receive the adequate "antibodies" to escape unscathed from the ideological viruses that also lurk at school. Silvana De Mari holds it, medico, blogger and writer, according to which the root of this deception lies in a minefield that takes the name of "biopolitics".
Doctor De Mari, what is meant by “biopolitics”?
«It is a term that was coined by Michel Foucault, That, incidentally, he was one of the signatories of the famous pro-pedophilia manifesto, besieged Simone de Beauvoir, Jean-Paul Sartre, Daniel Cohn-Bendit and others in the late 1970s. The biopolitics is born, when politics begins to deal with our bodies. Previously, politics certainly didn't come to tell you whether your child should survive or die. My allusion is to the terrifying cases of Charlie Gard e Alfie Evans. The State may not have sufficient resources to treat all the sick and this is the price we risk paying with public healthcare. In those two cases, families had the money needed to treat their children outside the hospitals where they were admitted, yet the State sentenced those two children to death. The State is annihilating biology and, with it, also the concepts of fatherhood and motherhood".
The most recent case is that of France, where the Ministry of Education has replaced the terms "mother" and "father" with "parent 1" and "parent 2" not only in school documents but even in lessons...
«“Parent 1” and “parent 2” are two idiotic terms, first of all because they imply a numerical hierarchy. We should understand, con 1 e 2, that parents are no longer on the same level of dignity? With this language, However, they also want to eliminate children's rights, starting from the right to have a father and a mother. They can get out of this rule, painfully, only adopted children, not because there is a parental couple who adopts the child but because the child has the right to parents, his own or others who valiantly lend themselves to bending over him. The father cannot be replaced, if it isn't there, there isn't. The lack of a father figure is an open wound in the hearts of children of mothers who live with a lesbian partner. Since two eggs put together do not make a fertilized egg and since two sperm put together do not make a fertilized egg, There cannot be children of two mothers, nor children of two fathers. Nevertheless, this lie continues to be broadcast. This French law serves to prevent mourning for the very few "children" of this lineage. We must deny these children pain and anger but it is only through pain and anger that mourning can be processed. The child “son of two mothers” or “two fathers” cannot acquire his anger, therefore to prevent him from expressing it, the terms “parent 1” and “parent 2” are used, to satisfy the few couples - numerically infinitesimal even from an electoral point of view - who have "children" in this way".
What is there, At that time, behind these ideological machinations?
«There is something bigger behind it: a ferocious desire to destroy this civilization and its history. Once we have introduced “parent 1” and “parent 2”, what we do, let's eliminate all the books where there is a mother and a father, starting with Betrothed? To avoid irritating the “rainbow couples”, what we will make the children read? Only Tarzan, The Jungle Book? O magari Mickey Mouse, since no one has ever understood whose children Qui are, Quo and Qua? Let's add Tom Sawyer, since he is raised by his aunt, and world children's literature ends here. Unfortunately, these children will discover in the public gardens that there is a mother, indeed they will re-discover it, Why, within himself, they knew it but they didn't know where their pain came from. A pain that, thanks to this absolutely insane law, which destroys the language and soul of a people, can no longer be expressed".
What impact could the use of this "school newspeak" have on minors??
«It depends on the family. If the family informs the child of the lies they may be told at school, nothing significant will happen, On the contrary, the child will learn to exercise his critical sense. So it is important that parents get to the child before school. For their part, but, teachers are state employees, therefore they tend, rightly, to be obedient to their employer. Just like, a time, the school taught that the Aryan race existed and was superior, today the school indoctrinates to create the new man, the man without identity, without religion, without ethnicity, without a nation, without family and – why not – even without sex. So we have to explain it to our children, when they are two or three years old, before school: “You have a penis like your dad, because you are a boy, you have a vagina like your mother because you are a girl". They must be told that children are born from a father and a mother and that they need a father and a mother. It must be explained to them that every biological system has a physiology that harmonizes with their anatomy and vice versa. The digestive tract is used for digestion: anyone at school tells you has procreative functions, he's lying to you. If with them we will make this clear immediately, we will make our children invincible".
Luca Marcolivio
source – https://www.notizieprovita.it/notizie-dal-mondo/francia-cancella-mamma-e-papa-de-mari-spiegare-subito-ai-bambini-la-menzogna/
