
The article pairs Catholic ecclesiastical titles with the conciliar modernist neochurch (obviously they are all to be understood as addressed to it and not to the Catholic Church! N.d.r.)
Bergoglio promulgated “Truth Joy”, an apostolic act that aims to revolutionize Catholic education. Here is the Vatican's plan
Of Francesco Boezi
Pope Francis also intends to revolutionize the approach to theological studies. In the press room of the Holy See, two days ago, the Apostolic Constitution was presented The joy of truth.
The act in question has as its object a cultural plan of Vatican tended to “to impart to ecclesiastical studies that wise and courageous renewal that is required by the missionary transformation of an outgoing Church”. Catholicism, In short, is committed to opening up to the world at three hundred and sixty degrees and the teaching of theology and doctrine must also adapt to modernity.
” Yes, the dream – declared Cardinal Giuseppe Versaldi, Prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education, referring to the vision of Pope Francis – it is that of a pastoral conversion in a missionary sense, understand that there is a need for a new evangelization because we can no longer believe that the majority of people are believers and have understood what the Christian message is in its substance and truth”. The cultural innovations and technologies introduced by the third industrial revolution have somehow forced the Catholic Church to also take into consideration the changes dictated by our era.
The expression “cultural revolution”, of the rest, which is the explicit request of Jorge Mario Bergoglio contained in The joy of truth, it was already present in the encyclical “Laudato Yes”. Ecclesiastical universities and theology faculties are called today to have a missionary vocation and to renew the priorities envisaged. The Church – Francis declared – does not yet have the culture necessary to deal with it “the anthropological and environmental crisis”. Four guidelines identified by the pontiff for Catholic education, At that time, they should help close this gap: “missionary identity”, the emphasis on dialogue, inter-disciplinarity and the need to create a network between educational realities.
The innovations introduced by the Apostolic Constitution – as reported by The Press – concern multiple areas: updated rules, establishment of university master's degrees, openness to scholars coming from sensibilities different from those usually involved, valorization of “peripheral realities”, creation of new research centers and so on. The revolution di Francesco continues relentlessly. But someone, as usual, he turns up his nose. “Every day a pickaxe blow (or even two) on the cathedral, on the Church – he wrote Antonio Socci on his profile Facebook referring to Bergoglio -. “Today he first bombed Catholic universities and ecclesiastical education and then reiterated the Bergoglian doctrine on matrimonial annulments. The demolition continues every day”. The Church that embraces the world, the one that adapts itself to the contemporary, ultimately, traditionalist thinkers continue to dislike it. It couldn't be otherwise.
Pope Francis is carrying out a series of changes destined to make history. The impression is that the Church today finds itself at a crossroads: go back by restoring the tradition and a certain austerity preceding this pontificate or follow up on the profound reform begun with this papacy. In Bergoglio's plan there is no room for “closures” doctrinal. Let alone for educational ones. The doctrinal fracture that arose around “The joy of love” continues to represent the clearest proof of this assumption.
The Argentine pontiff seems to want schools and places of education to become experimental, as scientific as possible, definitely not opposites though “party taken” to new types of mentalities. “Clean up, transform and build” they are the guidelines that the Pope has indicated to the Church for the future. That of the pontiff, but, for some it is a practical vision of religion which “he fights” – as pointed out by the philosopher Radaelli – with the teachings of Jesus Christ. Bergoglio's cultural revolution envisages a completely suitable Church, through the teaching of the Gospel, to cope with the change of era. Others believe that the Church must return to “beat” the world for its relativist tendencies. “Drive away the merchants from the temple”, In short, remaining as dissimilar as possible from the latter.
Source: http://m.ilgiornale.it/news/2018/01/31/la-rivoluzione-culturale-di-papa-francesco-cosi-cambia-listruzione-cat/1489109/
Similar Posts





Bergoglio's expression is very interesting. In fact, on the Treccani website we read::
Cultural revolution
Chinese political campaign, whose full name is Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (Wuchan jieji wenhua da geming), launched by Mao Zedong during his last decade of power (1966-76). Mao intended to strengthen his authority within the Communist Party (PCC), weakened following the failure of the Great Leap Forward policy (1958-61) and curb the reformism promoted by the pragmatists Deng Xiaoping (1904-97) e Liu Shaoqi (1898-1979). During the 11th plenum of the VIII Central Committee (1°-12 August 1966), under the pretext of cleansing the party of "counter-revolutionary revisionists", Mao incited the new Chinese generations to rebel against the "four old men" (old currents of thought, old culture, old habits and old traditions), because they undermined China's transformation into a socialist country. In August of 1966, secured the support of the People's Liberation Army (EPL) led by Lin Biao (1908-1971), he inaugurated the open phase of the revolution through a manifesto drawn up by himself (Bomb the headquarters) and demonstrations in Tiananmen Square (18 August-November 25). Lower and upper school students, organized in the structures of the Red Guards (Hongweibing), many responded to Mao's appeal: and manifest (dazibao) and violence against politicians and representatives in power was rife in the provinces, in cities and work units (danwei). Everything that had a connection with the "old world" was eliminated, like the scholastic-cultural system, and party committees were replaced by revolutionary committees run by the masses, party and army. Prominent CCP figures were accused of undermining the spirit of the proletarian revolution, forced into self-criticism, to resign and move - especially the intellectuals - to the most remote countryside to be "re-educated"; in case of resistance, physical and armed violence was frequently resorted to. (…)
Bergoglio like Mao?
For yes , since I consider them both agents of evil 🙂 .
CITTA’ of the VATICAN, 23 December 1970
MEMORANDUM INTESA tra INTERNATIONAL JEWISH COMMITTEE for INTERRELELIGEOUS CONSULTATION (IJCIC) and SECRETARIAT for UNITA’ OF CHRISTIANS.
………………
………………
b) Elimination of anti-Semitism in all its forms, as required by the NOSTRA AETATE declaration, particularly in religion and history manuals, in order to present Judaism in a respectful manner, ACCORDING TO HIS OWN SELF UNDERSTANDING (shift. mio) at all levels of teaching and education..
e
on December 1st 1974, Roma
GUIDELINES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNCIL DECLARATION NOSTRA AETATE.,
“Among the media, the following ones are of particular importance:
-catechetical manuals;
-history books;
-means of social communication (press,
radio, cinema, television).
The effective use of these means presupposes in-depth training of teachers and educators, in normal schools, seminaries and universities. ”
These precepts are always reiterated at every meeting between the two delegations up to the present day.
What Bergoglio says again?
…..
comment on my previous post.:
When reading the documents of the secretariat for Christian unity – right from the start (1960) – what idea can we form about the catholicity of its members??