The fortnightly column continues in EXCLUSIVE for Agerecontra.it by a famous writer, who loves to sign himself “Longinus” and he knows what he's talking about, in each of his pungent current affairs articles…
FIFTH COLUMN
Of Longinus

He gloats Emma Bonino ahead of the elections 4 March. Despite the excommunications which he receives daily from the Transnational Radical Party. The heirs of Pannella, Indeed – owners of that Radio that receives every year from the State 10 million euros for its business – they don't fit his monopoly on radical history, they affirm everywhere, also evicting her from the premises and protesting for having been canceled from radio and television information, while she goes crazy on television and in print. After the octogenarian Ornella Vanoni at the Sanremo Festival, even the New York Times, with a correspondence from Rome, he took care of her, underlining "the pro-European faith and commitment to civil rights that characterized the entire political career of the former European Commissioner and former Foreign Minister". The title of the article published by the American newspaper – “He won the hearts of Italians. But he can win their votes?” – looks a lot like Bonino's habitual declaration every time the elections approach: “Love me less. Vote for me more". This time, he took things up a notch and turned to those Italian kids who throughout his political life, promoting abortion, he tried not to give birth, telling them: “You were not good at being born in Italy. You are not talented at living in a family that buys you clothes and sends you to school. You just got lucky. The least you can do is take some responsibility, including voting".

This type of persuasion works. Of votes, Bonino will take many of them. All polls point to his list +Europe very close to the threshold of 3% and there are some who say the barrier is already well exceeded. In this case, they would be at least 10 the parliamentarians, in addition to those armored in colleges, made available by the PD and which concern Bonino herself, Riccardo Magi, secretary of “Italian Radicals”, Benedetto Della Vedova, promoter of the Lista and record holder of transformism and Bruno Tabacci, the self-styled Catholic who gave the List the symbol of the "Democratic Center" to avoid the collection of signatures for the presentation. If this result were achieved, it would be a big problem for Matteo Renzi, because for the mechanisms of the electoral law – which was tailor-made for this objective – the conquest of 3% for one of the formations allied to the PD, it would deprive this party of the possibility of having the highest number of parliamentarians in the Chamber of Deputies compared to all other political formations.

The background to consider, Therefore, is the following: the anti-Renzi faction, present in the PD, could be use Bonino to ensure that a significant number of votes flow to her list, in order to settle internal accounts. A solution” which could also suit Massimo D'Alema – who has always been very close to Emma Bonino – who is very worried about the direction that the political adventure of “Liberi e Uguali” has taken, which drops fearfully in the polls, due to the ineffectiveness of the leadership offered to Pietro Grasso. A consistent statement from Bonino would not only suit leader maximo, but also to others environments. Like that of Giuliano Ferrara, for example, who years ago attempted to return to Parliament by founding a party against abortion, but on February 8 he stated in the "Foglio": “”I never would have thought that, now in virtual retirement from public life, I should have voted in my Roman constituency, as a supporter of the only remaining constitutional party, for a PD that will help me put the cross on Paolo Gentiloni in the Chamber, and oh well, and Emma Bonino in the Senate”. Not to mention The Press – which among newspapers has always represented the most influential economic circles in the country – and of Republic Party, who every other day also put Emma Bonino's statements on the front page, like the one relating to the event that took place in Macerata: “We should have all been there”, Bonino said. Not to remember the nineteen-year-old who was torn to pieces alive – with her heart and liver no longer found – but to testify against racism. Both, you are, for Italian anti-fascism – which has done more damage than fascism – the madness of an Italian is always right-wing racism, however, a terrorist attack never hides a Muslim, but always a fool, perhaps to be assisted with the money and homes of the Italians, which can also be taken away from elderly pensioners in large metropolises, who prefer to barricade themselves in their homes rather than see them occupied by the immigrants we host, without anyone lifting a finger.

In short, to the entire establishment - not just Italian, why George Soros is clamoring behind the scenes for such an authoritative and beloved member of the board of his Open Society - and for the mass media system, the electoral success of Emma Bonino's list could be useful. And a lot. The reserve of the Republic, whatever he calls it Alessandro Sallusti, in this case he could legitimately aspire to the second office of the State, the presidency of the Senate, springboard for the election as President of the Republic or for a prestigious position in the government of broad agreements that is expected. Fantapolitica? Mica so much, considering the commitment that Paolo Gentiloni is putting into supporting his list, together with Carlo Calenda, who has built a profile as an outsider for the new structures that lie ahead.

The strength of radical ideology has been underestimated for decades, which has become a single thought translated into anti-human laws. The sexual revolution, divorce, contraception, abortion, assisted fertilization, homosexualist ideology, euthanasia, anti-prohibitionism regarding drugs – and tomorrow, to these laws, the legalization of pedophilia and incest could be added – they only constituted the first attack of this secular-relativist ideology, conducted by a vanguard illuminated, minority, but very organized and super-lobbying. A real war of extermination was waged, in Italian culture and legislation, step by step, against all the foundations and cornerstones of divine law and in particular against the family and society.

This ideology has become – in fact – a mass party, with an expertly spread parliamentary representation and it was opposed by nothingness. While there are those who have fun – lucky him – to give report cards to the so-called Catholic candidates present in this or that party and indicates in particular in “We with Italy” – the training of Cesa and Fitto – the solution for the defense of Catholic principles, in an interview with Massimo Franco del “Corriere della Sera”, of February 8, il “cardinal” Camillo Ruini, who was the strategist, in the last twenty years, of the Catholic presences spread across the various parliamentary groups, he stated: “Catholics risk becoming irrelevant”. They are not convinced of the failure, which has already been consumed, coincidentally, those former radical candidates of "We with Italy", come Eugenia Roccella and Gaetano Quagliariello, who promise to want to make fire and flame with respect to those laws already approved which refer to radical ideology and which they have very blandly fought. Deception mirrors – to the detriment of the party that will come out on top in the alliance – like Bonino, that after completing the first attack, laid the foundations – with the help of Bergoglio and a large part of the Catholic world – for the second attack: his campaign “I was a foreigner – humanity that does good", which aims to replace the Italian and European population, as it was in the design of the Paneuropa by Kalergi. Of this second attack, who wants to impose the dictatorship of Universal Happiness promised by the prince of this world and by the Masonic and para-Masonic cliques, Few people notice it and the so-called Catholics leaving or entering the institutions are completely uninterested in it. It is Bonino herself who reassures, of the rest. Guest of Lilli Gruber, on “Otto e mezzo” on February 8th, dice, in the final two minutes, with the presenter looking at her astonished: “If we're done, I would like to say something to you. Next time Travaglio comes, you can explain to him that the Bildeberg Group is not the Ku Klux Kan. No, because I am accused of having participated once during the mad cow crisis. Maybe if she tells him and also tells him that she goes there sometimes, like Bernabè, like Gozi, like Fabiola Giannotti, like Maurizio Molinari. The Ku Klux Kan is something else! He wants to tell her, Please?”.

How do you say: an apology was not requested, clear accusation.