It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran

Of Editorial team
The effort of those who curate this Catholic-traditionalist or integral Catholic site is to help understand the facts that happen in the world. We don't give “magisterial definitions”, we don't produce “kill the game”, we hate niche intellectualism and snippets that no one reads. We love current events because by trying to delve deeper into them we believe we can keep our feet on the ground, with realism and pragmatism, avoiding flights of fancy and drifts of various kinds, which seem grotesque to us, such as ecumania to raise cash, the Freemasonmania that sees lodges even in the coffee cup, the conspiracy mania that NEVER sees the facts as they are but NECESSARY with a conspiracy, nostalgia for dead historical eras, that will never return, the “speckling” of Tradition, through hypocritical personalisms. The articles that are reported to us or those that we write are only contributions to the search for the Truth or harsh criticisms of modernity, in the wake of writers, authors, authoritative thinkers who preceded us.
We do it with the style of publicly engaged lay people, therefore journalistic or essayistic e, Obviously, not everything we publish by other authors involves adhering to their thoughts or actions. This is not Pravda nor Osservatore Romano. E’ a free space, sometimes provocative, It's not mainstream, follows a very clear line, which is integral Catholic and identitarian, open to constructive criticism. We know that most of our many readers (circa 2.000 daily on average, but with very high peaks, that reach the 10.000 on some occasions) he knows what he testifies. We know that you can't please everyone and that's part of it “game”. For those who persist in not wanting to understand this guideline: let's deal with it.
Of Tim Black
It's not the United States versus Assad: it's United States versus Iran
Source: Comedonchisciotte
If there is anything that can be indicative of how superficial and provocative the airstrikes against Syria have been, this is the almost desperate refusal of the United States and its allies to take responsibility for the consequences, intentional or not, of attacks.
We were told it was a targeted mission, self-sufficient, and that its objectives have been completely met. Jim Mattis, the United States Secretary of Defense, he called the attacks “isolated” and nothing more than that. Even more revealing, Boris Johnson, UK Foreign Secretary, he said the attacks were limited to preventing the chemical weapons “taboo” from being undermined, stating that “the Syrian war will continue as before”. Read More

Share

Assad restituisce la Legion d'onore alla Francia: "Non è un onore avere un'onorificenza di un paese schiavo degli USA"

https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/resizer/resiz/public/5ad9ace308f3d9f3438b4568.jpg/526x275c50.jpg

CONTINUE ON:

https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/dettnews-assad_restituisce_la_legion_donore_alla_francia_non__un_onore_avere_unonorificenza_di_un_paese_schiavo_degli_usa/82_23756/ Read More

Share

Nothing happened in Syria, the West is lost

Of Pierrick Tillet
Nothing happened in Syria, the West is lost
Source: counterinformation
I feel a little reassured because nothing happened. If you followed the Anglo-American press, something I do every morning, you were in an anti-Russian escalation. In fact what happened after the events in England, which resulted in the speech, it was a sort of growing Russophobia that was absolutely mysterious and deserves analysis. And the latest diplomatic development was that the Americans and Trump tweeted threatening a massive attack, ecc. And the Russians who said: Listen well, if so, we will use our anti-aircraft defense and this system that scares everyone, the S400 system which appears to be the best surface-to-air defense system in the world.
At that point there was simply the possibility of a bigger war and some sort of showdown, the cards revealed at the end of a poker game, since it is actually unknown what the Russians are capable of. The S400 may be able to destroy everything that flies in the air and in ten minutes there would be the end of the American empire. Or there would have been a failure of the S400s and the US would have gone on the rampage again.
Well, we shot firecrackers, we negotiated with the Russians. There had been an anti-Russian dynamic that was building and, in the end, the Americans, the British and French struck where the Russians authorized them to strike. So we are back to nothing. At the current state of information, I feel quite reassured. Read More

Share

Macron, l'europeista a parole che pensa solo agli interessi della Francia

Of Alberto Negri
Macron, the verbal pro-European who thinks only of France's interests
Source: Linkiesta
French President Emmanuel Macron puffed out his chest in his speech to the European Parliament, knowing full well that with Great Britain's imminent exit from the Union it will remain the only member country that sits on the UN Security Council and has a significant atomic potential. He reiterates that his intervention in Syria together with the American and British ones “saved the honor of Europe”. In truth, Westerners saved face after losing the war in Syria where Russia and Iran managed to keep Bashar Al Assad's regime in place.. Now a new chapter will probably begin with the clash between Iran and Israel.
It is a negligible fact that since the beginning of the revolt seven years ago France has tried in every way to have its say in the former colony: first he focused on the fall of Assad, even supporting the jihadists, then in 2013 he wanted to bomb Damascus, then with the attacks in France in 2015 Hollande asked the Syrian dictator to fly over the country to take revenge and strike ISIS. Short memory and not only of the French.
Macron himself speaks of a "poisoned debate" but whoever arrogated the right to send French policemen to Italian territory in Bardonecchia against all the rules: Paris has not yet apologized and probably never will
The astute Macron even promised a few weeks ago to protect the Syrian Kurds from Erdogan by receiving a Kurdish delegation and sending 150 soldiers from Iraq but in reality he accomplished nothing, like Trump who sold his allies against the Caliphate to Türkiye. Read More

Share

Non c'è stato alcun attacco chimico in Siria

Of Robert Fish
There was no chemical attack in Syria
Source: Megachip
From the reportage of the famous and historic war reporter Rober Fisk it is clear that there was no attack with chemical weapons in Douma. Fisk's version may be contested. Vero, but since the governments of USA, France and Britain attacked Syria as they received information dai social network of the use of gas by the Syrian army, why you shouldn't believe an internationally renowned reporter who has more than 40 For years he has been producing reports from the battlefields? Fisk's article acquires greater authority since he cannot be defined as an Assad sympathizer at all. From the article, here in the original, emerge. Full translation follows. [The Anti-Diplomat] This is the story of a city called Douma, a devastated, smelly place of destroyed apartment blocks – and of an underground clinic whose images of suffering allowed three of the Western world's most powerful nations to bomb Syria last week. There is also a friendly doctor in a green coat who, when I track him down at the same clinic, he cheerfully tells me that the recovery of “gas” which horrified the world – despite all the doubters – it is perfectly genuine. Read More

Share

Hitting Putin's Russia to educate the rest of the world (but there is no new cold war)

BEYOND PROPAGANDA, IN SEARCH OF THE TRUTH’
In reality there is no Cold War except in the desire of Western democracies to create it (as in the case of the former Russian spy killed in London… but by whom?)
Of Giampaolo Rossi

(AUTOMATIC READING)
Because the Moscow secret services (or Putin himself according to some) they would have decided to eliminate a former Russian spy living in London, handed over by themselves to the English 10 years before and which would have long since ceased all activity?
Per “revenge because the Russians do not forgive traitors”, those who know things explain. But then why didn't they kill him during the years when the spy was a prisoner in Moscow prisons?
And then why do it to 15 days after the presidential elections in Russia which will see Putin win his fourth term and at the moment of maximum tension between Russia and the West, in which Europe and the United States are accusing Moscow of practically everything (in a while’ also the ozone hole)?
And why to delete this “retired spy” they would have poisoned her with a chemical substance identified by British experts as “Novichok”, one of the most lethal nerve agents created and developed in Uzbekistan laboratories during the times of the Soviet Union?
Because the Russians would have left this perfect author's signature to theirs “useless” plot? It wasn't simpler than a gunshot to the head from a hitman or one of those unsuspected road accidents in which the victim unintentionally loses his life in absolutely random circumstances?
And we are sure that this “poison” leads directly to the responsibility of Moscow? Read More

Share

Attack in Syria: World War III postponed again this time…

THE OPINION
Of Giulio Ginnetti
A few days after the Western missile raid in Syria, it appears increasingly clear that it has not undermined the agreement between Trump and Putin to manage the spheres of influence in the troubled Middle Eastern country. What Russia and the United States have in common is the need to reaffirm their primacy on the international level, eroded in recent decades, but to do so in a way that manages differences, according to the agreement signed at the G20 in Hamburg, in July 2017.
Each of the two powers follows its own "national interests". The synthesis National Defense Strategy 2018 signed by US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, makes it clear that the primary national security concern of the United States is no longer terrorism, but the strategic competition between states. And between Russia and China, the two main actors, with the United States, on international theatre, Trump considers China his most formidable opponent and is seeking an agreement with Putin, to prevent the formation of an anti-American Russian-Chinese alliance.
The target of the raid, which was limited to a spectacular surgical operation, it was therefore not about overthrowing the Assad regime, protected by Moscow, but to strengthen the image of the United States. Trump, convinced French President Macron and British Prime Minister May to carry out a demonstration, without causing damage to Russian forces, obtaining in exchange Moscow's non-interference. Read More

Share

US Secretary of Defense: "Non abbiamo prove che Assad abbia usato armi chimiche"

Grotesque and warmongering Americanism…history repeats itself…but this time they admit it… (n.d.r.)

http://www.oltrelalinea.news/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/130305150918-james-mattis-1-full-169.jpg

After so many biased and one-sided narratives, The US has finally admitted that it has no evidence that Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons. This communication, in conclusion, …

CONTINUE ON:
http://www.oltrelalinea.news/2018/02/17/segretario-della-difesa-usa-non-abbiamo-prove-che-assad-abbia-usato-armi-chimiche/ Read More

Share

Macron, l'europeista a parole che pensa solo agli interessi della Francia

Report Linkiesta

Image

Macron, the pro-European in words who thinks only of the interests of France

In his speech to the European Parliament he claimed that with the attack in Syria he "saved the honor of Europe". Actually, France thinks only of its own interest. Which almost always, from the intervention in Libya to the mission in Niger, it is contrary to the Italian one. (Of Alberto Negri, LAWS)

Read More

Share
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8